Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > United
No pilots involved in interview process? >

No pilots involved in interview process?

Search

Notices

No pilots involved in interview process?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-14-2015 | 09:31 AM
  #11  
E2CMaster's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 624
Likes: 0
From: BE350 PIC
Default

How on earth are people getting hired with no Turbine PIC?
Reply
Old 02-14-2015 | 09:49 AM
  #12  
cadetdrivr's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 2,639
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by E2CMaster
How on earth are people getting hired with no Turbine PIC?
FWIW, the published minimum is 1000 turbine (no PIC turbine required).

Obviously most competitive applicants will have significant turbine PIC. Those without turbine PIC typically, but not always, fit a couple of categories:
1) Successful Company Internship
2) Able to check certain boxes on the application
3) Nephew of a Chief Pilot
That said, it appears that the number of folks being hired without turbine PIC is not terribly significant as a percentage.
Reply
Old 02-14-2015 | 10:30 AM
  #13  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 5,231
Likes: 65
Default

Originally Posted by E2CMaster
How on earth are people getting hired with no Turbine PIC?
The SAME way they ALWAYS have at a carrier without a TPIC requirement.
Reply
Old 02-14-2015 | 11:08 AM
  #14  
Don't say Guppy
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,926
Likes: 0
From: Guppy driver
Default

I used to think pilots should hire pilots. Then I worked a couple of other flying jobs outside UAL. I now think HR should hire pilots almost exclusively,with pilots only acting as a BS screen.
Reply
Old 02-14-2015 | 11:14 AM
  #15  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 5,231
Likes: 65
Default

Originally Posted by Probe
I used to think pilots should hire pilots. Then I worked a couple of other flying jobs outside UAL. I now think HR should hire pilots almost exclusively,with pilots only acting as a BS screen.
Ask fedex guys how that worked out going from mostly a pilot driven screening process to a mostly HR driven process.
Reply
Old 02-14-2015 | 11:15 AM
  #16  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 1,168
Likes: 0
From: Gets weekends off
Default

Originally Posted by Probe
I used to think pilots should hire pilots. Then I worked a couple of other flying jobs outside UAL. I now think HR should hire pilots almost exclusively,with pilots only acting as a BS screen.
Well it isn't a perfect system. We have lots of United pilots that went to an interview, didn't get hired, got hired at CAL, are now United pilots, and are no worse or better than any other United pilot. We turn away too many qualified people IMO. Lots of my friends didn't get hired here, and I can't figure out why not. They are successful pilots at other majors.
Reply
Old 02-14-2015 | 11:18 AM
  #17  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 1,168
Likes: 0
From: Gets weekends off
Default

Originally Posted by John Carr
Ask fedex guys how that worked out going from mostly a pilot driven screening process to a mostly HR driven process.
I interviewed and was hired at FEDEX (but took the United job instead) in 1996. I never saw an HR person. I flew in the sim with a FEDEX pilot and was interviewed by 2 FEDEX pilots. The only admin person I ever saw was the one that administered the test all prospective pilots take.
Reply
Old 02-14-2015 | 11:21 AM
  #18  
Don't say Guppy
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,926
Likes: 0
From: Guppy driver
Default

I won't expand upon my opinion as it would offend some on this board. But pilots are experts at being pilots. HR are experts at evaluating individuals for the purpose of employment.

yeah, some HR people are complete idiots, as are some of us. But after working a couple of other jobs, I stand by my previously stated opinion.
Reply
Old 02-14-2015 | 11:30 AM
  #19  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 5,231
Likes: 65
Default

Originally Posted by pilot64golfer
I interviewed and was hired at FEDEX (but took the United job instead) in 1996. I never saw an HR person. I flew in the sim with a FEDEX pilot and was interviewed by 2 FEDEX pilots. The only admin person I ever saw was the one that administered the test all prospective pilots take.
That process changed somewhat later on to include almost 100% (AGAIN, almost) pilot screening to be selected for interview. Where HR had a say who was selected for interview AFTER the candidates had a screen with JUST pilots. With HR having a say after the F2F.

The current system, meh, not so much....
Reply
Old 02-14-2015 | 01:41 PM
  #20  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 727
Likes: 0
From: It's still a Guppy, just a bit longer.
Default

Originally Posted by E2CMaster
How on earth are people getting hired with no Turbine PIC?
Probably because they realized that a 5-7,000TT FO who has spent almost a decade at his/her dying regional is no different in quality than a 4,000TT CA at a regional that experienced random growth.

Anyways, very few FO's are getting hired. And most of the ones who have were former United/CAL interns or had very high level connections. The nepotism factor is way down compared to years ago, but I think some still exists. I remember one guy posted on here talking about having something like 2,500TT who got hired very early on.

If I could go back in time, I would have gone to Eagle, gotten a flow-through, and been at AA by now. Or quit and gone to Compass when they started up, etc. Hindsight is 20/20.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
R57 relay
American
150
01-12-2015 07:02 PM
nwa757
American
178
01-10-2015 10:54 AM
P-3Bubba
Major
174
04-23-2014 06:14 AM
samballs
Regional
368
09-26-2012 09:23 PM
usmc-sgt
Regional
44
03-11-2012 02:04 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices