Search

Notices

Vacancy Bid

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-09-2015 | 06:15 PM
  #61  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 621
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by intrepidcv11
And since this is APC, a good old conspiracy theory should be tossed. Latest manning summary shows zero change to the plan to shove all future sparkie flying into IAH by mid 2016. So the staffing continues to significantly grow on the West Coast despite no additional flying. Never seen that before. Clearly the number of CAL guys willing to commute to WB reserve is running out. Curious...
You need to look at the big picture. We have 13 787 deliveries in less than twelve month. The next 8 are initially (temporarily) going to IAH. On paper, IAH has a lot of 787 pilots. In reality, many are 737 Captains that need to be trained. I doubt the company can train them, plus additional displacements, in time to cover the new IAH flying. Reason being, the system can't afford to lose that many 737 captains overnight. New capt's in other bases must be trained first. So, there will be a lag in training the Iah 787 fo's. The slack will be picked up by SFO and lax. Notice that they are only asking for 5 new 787 IAh Capts on this bid. IAH can't cover the flying.

Why not just open more vacancies in IAh? Because, long term, they don't plan to run that many 787 routes out of Iah. What you will see is the staffing adjust to the amount of displaced 737 Captains in IAH. Figure another 40 go to 787 FO. Now you have enough crews in Iah to cover an additional 3 routes over what is there today. So, dh SFO crews to IAH and/or create W trips and have them cover the temporary staffing issue. Sometime next year they will open up additional flying in SFO and reduce some of the flying in IAH. When their happens they will not have surplus crews in IAH and SFO will have the staffing to handle the additional flying.
Reply
Old 07-09-2015 | 11:19 PM
  #62  
Don't say Guppy
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,926
Likes: 0
From: Guppy driver
Default

Originally Posted by CALFO
You need to look at the big picture. We have 13 787 deliveries in less than twelve month. The next 8 are initially (temporarily) going to IAH. On paper, IAH has a lot of 787 pilots. In reality, many are 737 Captains that need to be trained. I doubt the company can train them, plus additional displacements, in time to cover the new IAH flying. Reason being, the system can't afford to lose that many 737 captains overnight. New capt's in other bases must be trained first. So, there will be a lag in training the Iah 787 fo's. The slack will be picked up by SFO and lax. Notice that they are only asking for 5 new 787 IAh Capts on this bid. IAH can't cover the flying.

Why not just open more vacancies in IAh? Because, long term, they don't plan to run that many 787 routes out of Iah. What you will see is the staffing adjust to the amount of displaced 737 Captains in IAH. Figure another 40 go to 787 FO. Now you have enough crews in Iah to cover an additional 3 routes over what is there today. So, dh SFO crews to IAH and/or create W trips and have them cover the temporary staffing issue. Sometime next year they will open up additional flying in SFO and reduce some of the flying in IAH. When their happens they will not have surplus crews in IAH and SFO will have the staffing to handle the additional flying.
I think you are on drugs. There are too many IAH 737 Capts. The sooner they get on the 787, the better, according to Howie. Not me.
Reply
Old 07-10-2015 | 05:39 AM
  #63  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 1,253
Likes: 0
Default

So they are going to gut the IAH 777 flying and replace it with Sparkie then promptly reduce the Sparkie flying all within 12-18 months? I think I see why the phrase "the big picture" invokes eye rolls industry wide.
Reply
Old 07-10-2015 | 07:29 AM
  #64  
Don't say Guppy
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,926
Likes: 0
From: Guppy driver
Default

Originally Posted by intrepidcv11
So they are going to gut the IAH 777 flying and replace it with Sparkie then promptly reduce the Sparkie flying all within 12-18 months? I think I see why the phrase "the big picture" invokes eye rolls industry wide.
Huge IAH 777 bump coming down the road? LOL. You heard it hear first. Just kidding, but NOTHING would surprise me.
Reply
Old 07-10-2015 | 02:14 PM
  #65  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
Default

Any reason why this vacancy is having issues putting out snapshots?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Reply
Old 07-10-2015 | 02:56 PM
  #66  
ugleeual's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 3,042
Likes: 47
From: 767/757 CA
Default

Originally Posted by eagledriver122
Any reason why this vacancy is having issues putting out snapshots?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
having issues with Fences is what i've heard… but could be the same IT department issues we've been having.
Reply
Old 07-10-2015 | 02:57 PM
  #67  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 173
Likes: 0
Default

A little fencing reason
Reply
Old 07-10-2015 | 04:11 PM
  #68  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
Default

It's out finally. Looks like a fence thing as advertised.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Reply
Old 07-10-2015 | 04:12 PM
  #69  
Line Holder
 
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 1,200
Likes: 33
From: 777 CA
Default

New snapshot is out and quite a few sUAL 787 FO awards. And LAX went way senior.
Reply
Old 07-10-2015 | 05:07 PM
  #70  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 1,253
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by UALinIAH
New snapshot is out and quite a few sUAL 787 FO awards. And LAX went way senior.
But who wants to fly with a bunch of filthy scabs?
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Pilot7
Regional
67
12-22-2015 11:13 AM
Peterborg
American
4
02-12-2015 02:36 PM
pilotgolfer
United
46
02-10-2013 10:08 PM
ERJ135
Regional
44
07-21-2008 06:49 PM
Diesel 10
Cargo
1
08-11-2005 11:59 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices