Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   United (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/united/)
-   -   Union Email pertaining to UPA extension (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/united/91068-union-email-pertaining-upa-extension.html)

Pro2nd 10-06-2015 07:17 PM

Union Email pertaining to UPA extension
 
In the Union email we just got, can someone explain to me what MOU 22 and FRMS are?

Thanks!

Sniper66 10-06-2015 08:15 PM


Originally Posted by Thor (Post 1986839)
The company letter says they expect, "based on previous conversations", that they plan to discuss - among other things - the five bullet points.




The MEC Chairman's letter says they on will ONLY discuss the five bullet points.



Interesting counter to say we'll only discuss 6 items, I can think of a lot of things to discuss. What am I missing on NSNB aircraft, isn't that already in Section One?


NSNB is probably for the CS100 and since is not in the contract needs to be negotiated
CS300 is there and it should pay the same or close to it like A319/320 spread

gettinbumped 10-07-2015 12:43 AM


Originally Posted by Thor (Post 1986839)
The company letter says they expect, "based on previous conversations", that they plan to discuss - among other things - the five bullet points.




The MEC Chairman's letter says they on will ONLY discuss the five bullet points.



Interesting counter to say we'll only discuss 6 items, I can think of a lot of things to discuss. What am I missing on NSNB aircraft, isn't that already in Section One?

Interesting distinction that I had missed at first read. Company anticipates the discussion of 6 items, Jay's letter limits it to those 6.

From what I can gleen from the messages, the NSNB would be an actual order as part of the up-to two year extension. Section 1 deals with the integration of the aircraft IF ordered. Similar to the DAL TA, there was an order conditional to TA passing. When it failed the order was shelved. There may be more to it than that; just seems to me to make the most sense

Mitch Rapp05 10-07-2015 02:26 AM

It's going to cost a lot more than those 5-6 items to get me to vote yes. Time to see just how desperate the company is.

C-17 Driver 10-07-2015 03:55 AM


Originally Posted by Pro2nd (Post 1986809)
In the Union email we just got, can someone explain to me what MOU 22 and FRMS are?

Thanks!


recommend visiting The United Pilot Forum at UAL Pilot Forum

lots of answered questions there regarding this and many other topics. You will need thick skin, but your question(s) will be answered.

You have to be on the UAL seniority list to be on there. No management or SCABs allowed.

NFLUALNFL 10-07-2015 04:53 AM


Originally Posted by Mitch Rapp05 (Post 1986900)
It's going to cost a lot more than those 5-6 items to get me to vote yes. Time to see just how desperate the company is.

I agree, but let's at least hear what they are offering.

blockplus 10-07-2015 06:12 AM

Nsnb could be the company is looking at different frames than listed in sec 1. Chinese or czech... as far as im concerned 737-500s are not nsnb in case they ask.

Mitch Rapp05 10-07-2015 08:07 AM


Originally Posted by NFLUALNFL (Post 1986921)
I agree, but let's at least hear what they are offering.

Definitely.

bottoms up 10-07-2015 10:20 AM


Originally Posted by Thor (Post 1987074)
I hope we're not collectively stupid enough to trade scope provisions for an interm pay raise.

Well history does have a way of repeating itself.

But sure show up and listen and see just how bad they want it. No harm in that.

El10 10-07-2015 11:10 AM

Im confused, the letter clearly states NSNB flown by mainline. How in the word is that mis intuerpted into giving scope away?


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:44 AM.


User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Website Copyright ©2000 - 2017 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands