Munoz' Only Chance
10-16-2015 | 08:48 AM
#31
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 439
Likes: 0
That's the same line of B.S. that the LCAL side gave when they were given profit sharing without negotiating it.
We grieved it and won…so no, it's not "pre diluted".
And no, they should not get profit sharing if it's not in their contract.
We can't just have special groups given more than what they negotiated while leaving out the other "co-workers".
We grieved it and won…so no, it's not "pre diluted".
And no, they should not get profit sharing if it's not in their contract.
We can't just have special groups given more than what they negotiated while leaving out the other "co-workers".
10-16-2015 | 10:05 AM
#35
UCH Pilot
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 776
Likes: 1
From: 787
That's the same line of B.S. that the LCAL side gave when they were given profit sharing without negotiating it.
We grieved it and won…so no, it's not "pre diluted".
And no, they should not get profit sharing if it's not in their contract.
We can't just have special groups given more than what they negotiated while leaving out the other "co-workers".
We grieved it and won…so no, it's not "pre diluted".
And no, they should not get profit sharing if it's not in their contract.
We can't just have special groups given more than what they negotiated while leaving out the other "co-workers".
10-16-2015 | 10:14 AM
#36
Line Holder
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 1,091
Likes: 1
Recognizing the contribution that a group made to the company. Good concept. I agree. Yet when it comes to the furloughees and their years of longevity with the company and contribution they made, you think that should have been completely ignored.
10-16-2015 | 10:24 AM
#37
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 3,599
Likes: 205
From: 787
10-16-2015 | 11:18 AM
#38
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 3,076
Likes: 3
From: The GF of FUPM
What did the arbitrator say about it? Didn't this already get beat to death?
Last edited by oldmako; 10-16-2015 at 11:38 AM.
10-16-2015 | 11:29 AM
#39
UCH Pilot
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 776
Likes: 1
From: 787
I don't exactly know how to recognize longevity and what that's really worth. It looked like profit sharing was paid out based on pay received, so the 777 CA got more than a 737 FO, but did they really contribute more? Really? Also two pilots with the exact same longevity may be paid differently based on their BES and how much add pay they fly, so its not strictly longevity that matters to the company or the union.
10-16-2015 | 11:37 AM
#40
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 3,599
Likes: 205
From: 787
I don't exactly know how to recognize longevity and what that's really worth. It looked like profit sharing was paid out based on pay received, so the 777 CA got more than a 737 FO, but did they really contribute more? Really? Also two pilots with the exact same longevity may be paid differently based on their BES and how much add pay they fly, so its not strictly longevity that matters to the company or the union.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
