Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > United
Contract Extension and the 2172 >

Contract Extension and the 2172

Search

Notices

Contract Extension and the 2172

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-03-2015 | 07:11 AM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Line Holder
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 79
Likes: 0
Default Contract Extension and the 2172

Back in the day there was talk that "we" would have great power as a potential voting bloc. Is that even possible now or are we too far removed from the pain? Are there specific provisions (LOA 25) that might lead us to support or reject this extension? Any leadership out there within the group anymore?
Reply
Old 12-03-2015 | 08:19 AM
  #2  
Coto Pilot's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 645
Likes: 0
Default

I think that there are guys taking leadership roles, Randy Ott is running for the LEC in IAH and I think that the newly elected FO rep in LAX was also furloughed. Supposedly the AIP fixes LOA25 by paying us retroactive pay and hopefully the associated B fund match. This will be in the $10,000 to $20,000 range. We will have to look at the final document, but for many of us, this may sway a yes vote.
Reply
Old 12-03-2015 | 09:00 AM
  #3  
cadetdrivr's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 2,639
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by furloughforlife
Are there specific provisions (LOA 25) that might lead us to support or reject this extension?
Rumor (only) that the AIP restores pay longevity for UAL furlugheees to match the pay longevity that previously furloughed CAL pilots already received per the main body of the UPA. (And thus the consternation about LOA25.)

Personally, I'm waiting to read the entire TA (if it even gets to that) in its entirety before deciding to support or reject it.
Reply
Old 12-03-2015 | 11:16 AM
  #4  
pilotgolfer's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,982
Likes: 0
From: A320 Captain
Default

Originally Posted by cadetdrivr
Rumor (only) that the AIP restores pay longevity for UAL furlugheees to match the pay longevity that previously furloughed CAL pilots already received per the main body of the UPA. (And thus the consternation about LOA25.)

Personally, I'm waiting to read the entire TA (if it even gets to that) in its entirety before deciding to support or reject it.
If there is no backpay, they will have an uprising of massive proportions. But it will still get voted in.
Reply
Old 12-03-2015 | 12:07 PM
  #5  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 819
Likes: 2
From: 756 left
Default

Originally Posted by pilotgolfer
If there is no backpay, they will have an uprising of massive proportions. But it will still get voted in.
If there's no back pay for LOA25 this thing won't pass. Not a chance.
Reply
Old 12-03-2015 | 12:37 PM
  #6  
pilotgolfer's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,982
Likes: 0
From: A320 Captain
Default

Originally Posted by 89Pistons
If there's no back pay for LOA25 this thing won't pass. Not a chance.
The backpay will only go back to DOS...I think one guy on the forum had posted some calculations that had gone back prior to that. For the 2007 hires, this isn't much money...it mainly affects the 1999-2001 hires.

I have no clue what the story is on the CAL guys form their furlough in 2001. Maybe someone could explain how they would factor in. I think it mainly had to do with vacation accrual and pass travel, but I'm probably wrong.
Reply
Old 12-03-2015 | 01:02 PM
  #7  
WarEagle28's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 185
Likes: 0
From: 737 FO
Default

Originally Posted by pilotgolfer
The backpay will only go back to DOS...I think one guy on the forum had posted some calculations that had gone back prior to that. For the 2007 hires, this isn't much money...it mainly affects the 1999-2001 hires.

I have no clue what the story is on the CAL guys form their furlough in 2001. Maybe someone could explain how they would factor in. I think it mainly had to do with vacation accrual and pass travel, but I'm probably wrong.
I believe all of the CAL furloughees received pay longevity but did not receive pass travel or vacation
Reply
Old 12-03-2015 | 01:07 PM
  #8  
cadetdrivr's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 2,639
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by WarEagle28
I believe all of the CAL furloughees received pay longevity but did not receive pass travel or vacation
+1

This is my understanding....so essentially both groups received opposite benefits.

IMHO, this needs to be repaired for blue and black for any TA to be acceptable.
Reply
Old 12-03-2015 | 01:14 PM
  #9  
WarEagle28's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 185
Likes: 0
From: 737 FO
Default

Originally Posted by cadetdrivr
+1

This is my understanding....so essentially both groups received opposite benefits.

IMHO, this needs to be repaired for blue and black for any TA to be acceptable.
100% agree
Reply
Old 12-03-2015 | 02:40 PM
  #10  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 2,750
Likes: 0
From: 737 CA
Default

Couple things.

Is pass travel contractual?

Unless the bylaws have been changed, new hires on probation cannot vote.
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices