FAs have a TA
07-15-2016 | 09:59 AM
#31
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,112
Likes: 0
From: SFO Guppy CA
I think that it'll barely pass because of the fact that they have 2 yr. FAs from sCAL taking flying from sUAL FAs. Also, there are 25yr. FAs from sUAL that are on reserve and their contemporaries from CAL are holding a line very quickly after training.
07-15-2016 | 01:56 PM
#33
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,026
Likes: 100
07-15-2016 | 04:07 PM
#35
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 3,042
Likes: 47
From: 767/757 CA
I cannot imagine any LUAL flight attendant voting against this TA... this is there one opportunity to get the ISL moving along and regaining their seniority and ability to bid the long haul trips that LCAL flight attendants are grabbing now. If this fails the LCAL flight attendants will drag it on forever since they have a huge advantage flying lines they are way too junior to hold in a post ISL seniority list.
07-15-2016 | 06:56 PM
#36
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 5,510
Likes: 109
I cannot imagine any LUAL flight attendant voting against this TA... this is there one opportunity to get the ISL moving along and regaining their seniority and ability to bid the long haul trips that LCAL flight attendants are grabbing now. If this fails the LCAL flight attendants will drag it on forever since they have a huge advantage flying lines they are way too junior to hold in a post ISL seniority list.
Couple of reasons I heard for no votes were no signing bonus and more out of pocket for medical (that's nationwide, but never mind...)
One did relay a story about a run-in she had with the LCAL FA trying to start their own in house Union who said she would vote for it, because she needs the raise, but would continue trying to form their own Union. Can't make this stuff up.
07-15-2016 | 07:18 PM
#37
UCH Pilot
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 776
Likes: 1
From: 787
Couple of reasons I heard for no votes were no signing bonus and more out of pocket for medical (that's nationwide, but never mind...)
One did relay a story about a run-in she had with the LCAL FA trying to start their own in house Union who said she would vote for it, because she needs the raise, but would continue trying to form their own Union. Can't make this stuff up.
One did relay a story about a run-in she had with the LCAL FA trying to start their own in house Union who said she would vote for it, because she needs the raise, but would continue trying to form their own Union. Can't make this stuff up.
07-16-2016 | 07:36 AM
#38
Line Holder
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 558
Likes: 6
I cannot imagine any LUAL flight attendant voting against this TA... this is there one opportunity to get the ISL moving along and regaining their seniority and ability to bid the long haul trips that LCAL flight attendants are grabbing now. If this fails the LCAL flight attendants will drag it on forever since they have a huge advantage flying lines they are way too junior to hold in a post ISL seniority list.
Perhaps they want to get the best possible contract instead of rubber stamping a subpar deal just to get a list... Imagine that.
07-16-2016 | 07:45 AM
#39
Thread Starter
Line Holder
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 1,200
Likes: 33
From: 777 CA
LMAO. Yeah that's it. Nothing at all to do with them going from layovers in CDG to sitting reserve.
07-16-2016 | 08:22 AM
#40
Banned
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 846
Likes: 0
The LUAL F/A's understand that this may not be a good deal/contract but they understand it's not much different than what the LUAL pilots did to stop the shenanigans of JP and JS. Look at us now - we are just one happy family.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
