|
Originally Posted by SpecialTracking
(Post 2274357)
This is absurd. Did the the pilot cross and are they good to fly with? If you can answer yes to both then go have fun. If course a couple of the 570 are a little tweaked in the head, but I attribute that to the 5% rule. I had a great time with lots of memories flying with the other 95%.
If you want a valuable topic let's discuss the scabs. Let's talk about their all about me mentality. Let's discuss the new hires who proclaim since they were born in the early 80's they aren't concerned with scabs. |
Originally Posted by buscappy
(Post 2274674)
"I won't respond with facts or actual answers. I'll insult and grab my toys and go home. na na na "
nice one syd |
|
The big unknown here and an understated concern is where the small regionals who fly older, less automated equipment, going to get their pilots.
Just like sailing, these days the bigger the plane, the easier it is. If you want a challenge try flying some underpowered tube with propellers in a busy environment, with thunder storms or icing. My hat is off to those who have spent decades at the regionals, while maintaining a safe record. What quality of applicant can be expected to a program that does not have a clear path to a 787? |
This seems to good to be true... What's the catch? If we're all going to spend 1-2 years as a CFI anyhow, why not sign up for this program and go straight to UAL? Is there a reason to go through the regionals if something like this is available?
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:51 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands