Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   United (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/united/)
-   -   17-03v (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/united/98214-17-03v.html)

buscappy 11-10-2016 06:58 AM


Originally Posted by awax (Post 2241038)
So your premise is that the career owes you something but owes pilots who lost their pensions as they retired at 60 nothing? And it's only you who has "...suffered under onerous economic conditions...".

Tool.

"tool" times ten


each group wants more than the other group. (retired, senior, 18 yr double furlough, new hires)

i fly with new fo's who are earning now what i was earning as a 25 yr captain under the bk contract.

baseball is a typical pilot tool.

PA Slammer 11-10-2016 07:19 AM


Originally Posted by buscappy (Post 2241051)
"tool" times ten


each group wants more than the other group. (retired, senior, 18 yr double furlough, new hires)

i fly with new fo's who are earning now what i was earning as a 25 yr captain under the bk contract.

baseball is a typical pilot tool.

Us new hires have to fly way more advanced 700, 800 and 900 series guppies. Much tougher than those old 200 and 300 models.

[emoji12] I kid, I kid.

UALinIAH 11-10-2016 07:47 AM


Originally Posted by awax (Post 2241038)
So your premise is that the career owes you something but owes pilots who lost their pensions as they retired at 60 nothing? And it's only you who has "...suffered under onerous economic conditions...".

Tool.

I didn't read his post like that. I read it as ALPA should have fought tooth and nail to keep age 60 but they didn't. Many of us spent 5 lost years while the WB CAs kept collecting a max paycheck.

I agree with him. I don't want any changes. It absolutely sucked for the old hats getting screwed out of the A plan, but we ALL lost our A plan.

Point99orbetter 11-10-2016 08:18 AM

OK, so back to this 17-03v vacancy thing...
Looking at the snapshot from yesterday, I've got a question for the WB guys. Why are the 777 FO slots going senior to the 787 FO slots?
The 777 slots in the snapshot are going from 6000 seniority to 10,000.
The 787 slots go from 7800 to 11,700. So there's about an 1800 seniority shift, or two years seniority, mas o menos.
Any theories on this from some SFO wide body guys?
QOL is better? more efficient trips on the triple? Why the difference here?

intrepidcv11 11-10-2016 08:32 AM


Originally Posted by Point99orbetter (Post 2241103)
OK, so back to this 17-03v vacancy thing...
Looking at the snapshot from yesterday, I've got a question for the WB guys. Why are the 777 FO slots going senior to the 787 FO slots?
The 777 slots in the snapshot are going from 6000 seniority to 10,000.
The 787 slots go from 7800 to 11,700. So there's about an 1800 seniority shift, or two years seniority, mas o menos.
Any theories on this from some SFO wide body guys?
QOL is better? more efficient trips on the triple? Why the difference here?

Just my guess, but junior 787 flying in SFO increasingly sucks. You won't avoid a 5-6 day China trip esp in summer once you get past 50%. Can't trade out of them and those trips get old fast. Senior stuff is some of best in system, but other then occasional bunkie seat you won't get it.

awax 11-10-2016 09:35 AM


Originally Posted by Point99orbetter (Post 2241103)
Any theories on this from some SFO wide body guys?
QOL is better? more efficient trips on the triple? Why the difference here?


Originally Posted by intrepidcv11 (Post 2241116)
Just my guess, but junior 787 flying in SFO increasingly sucks. You won't avoid a 5-6 day China trip esp in summer once you get past 50%. Can't trade out of them and those trips get old fast. Senior stuff is some of best in system, but other then occasional bunkie seat you won't get it.

That's my take also.

2 things you don't want to miss in China: 1.) The tour of the Great Wall. 2.) Your flight outta there.

SFO 787 has largely become the China shuttle, and many astute practitioners can't come up with a good reason to justify going there. It's not quality of life, sanitation, air quality, personal hygiene, food safety, or clean water.

Grumble 11-10-2016 09:37 AM


Originally Posted by intrepidcv11 (Post 2241116)
Just my guess, but junior 787 flying in SFO increasingly sucks. You won't avoid a 5-6 day China trip esp in summer once you get past 50%. Can't trade out of them and those trips get old fast. Senior stuff is some of best in system, but other then occasional bunkie seat you won't get it.

Exactly why I won't bid 787. I also suspect maybe guys are prepositioning themselves for the 300 ER. Plus everyone on the first snapshot, at a glance, is above the gline.

awax 11-10-2016 09:44 AM


Originally Posted by UALinIAH (Post 2241082)
I didn't read his post like that. I read it as ALPA should have fought tooth and nail to keep age 60 but they didn't.

I think the ALPA rank and file were quite vocal, but if my memory is correct, it was ALPA President, Continental Captain John Prater who led the charge. Any assertion that "it was going to happen anyway, and ALPA just wanted a seat at the table" is resignation. That was within 18 months of him also announcing that we had to put "the scab issue" behind us. How proud we all were.

MasterOfPuppets 11-10-2016 09:58 AM


Originally Posted by Point99orbetter (Post 2241103)
OK, so back to this 17-03v vacancy thing...
Looking at the snapshot from yesterday, I've got a question for the WB guys. Why are the 777 FO slots going senior to the 787 FO slots?
The 777 slots in the snapshot are going from 6000 seniority to 10,000.
The 787 slots go from 7800 to 11,700. So there's about an 1800 seniority shift, or two years seniority, mas o menos.
Any theories on this from some SFO wide body guys?
QOL is better? more efficient trips on the triple? Why the difference here?

So many people bailed off the 777 when the flying went to hel and the fence dropped on the 787 that the triple got really junior. So pilots are. Is bidding in to better seniority than they have on the 787.

buscappy 11-10-2016 10:53 AM


Originally Posted by pa slammer (Post 2241061)
us new hires have to fly way more advanced 700, 800 and 900 series guppies. Much tougher than those old 200 and 300 models.

[emoji12] i kid, i kid.


😂😂😂

..............


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:51 PM.


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands