Search
Notices

756 for new hires

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-28-2018, 11:09 AM
  #121  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2007
Posts: 459
Default

Just flew with a 5yr FO who bid over to the 320 recently. Was tired of being 70%+ on the 756 vs 14% on the 320. Better QOL for the same hourly rate (seeing the bigger a/c on a regular basis on the 756 is a pipe dream if you're junior).
Spicy McHaggis is offline  
Old 01-23-2019, 03:17 PM
  #122  
New Hire
 
Joined APC: Feb 2017
Posts: 1
Default

What are the chances of breaking min on reserve out of SFO on the 756?
pilotk is offline  
Old 01-23-2019, 03:20 PM
  #123  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2014
Position: Head pillow fluffer, Assistant bed maker
Posts: 1,227
Default

Originally Posted by pilotk View Post
What are the chances of breaking min on reserve out of SFO on the 756?
Guessing not that great, probably make more just racking up short calls. To make guarantee you have to do about 13 days of flying. You only have 18 to do it and there are not that many trips in general and not that many open.
worstpilotever is offline  
Old 01-24-2019, 01:37 AM
  #124  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2017
Posts: 348
Default

Originally Posted by worstpilotever View Post
Guessing not that great, probably make more just racking up short calls. To make guarantee you have to do about 13 days of flying. You only have 18 to do it and there are not that many trips in general and not that many open.
You will make more as a line holder in the 737 than a reserve on the 756.
terminal is offline  
Old 01-24-2019, 05:54 AM
  #125  
ORD Prisoner
 
ChalupaBatman's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2017
Position: A320 FO
Posts: 113
Default

Originally Posted by terminal View Post
You will make more as a line holder in the 737 than a reserve on the 756.


But the dude has his whole career to fly that pig, why not enjoy the Cadillac while it’s still here?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
ChalupaBatman is offline  
Old 01-24-2019, 06:57 AM
  #126  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2010
Posts: 694
Default

for another perspective, I went straight to the 756. I don't regret it but agree you will be on reserve and won't get to a line as fast - so you'll likely take a pay hit. Especially on the east coast it's a totally different mission if you're coming from the regionals and that can be refreshing. Though people get burnt out from LHR due to length of drive and airport security, the city and the museums and pubs just barely edge out DSM and TUL and TLH if that's all you've been doing for a long time haha. Same goes for SNN and other stuff that you might find more often on reserve. If you switch coasts SFO (and LAX maybe?) lines go a lot more jr. It's not a wide variety of flying but one leg transcons to big cities are nice if it's your thing, and it's efficient flying. In the mean time 2 years goes by pretty quickly if you want to switch and 777/787 has at times been available in under 2 years. Variety is a big plus about UAL. There's something for everyone.
Chuck D is offline  
Old 03-06-2019, 05:43 PM
  #127  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2014
Posts: 425
Default

54x 756 awarded to the last 3 classes of new hires. Is this the new normal?
rvfanatic is offline  
Old 03-06-2019, 05:49 PM
  #128  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2013
Posts: 2,159
Default

Originally Posted by rvfanatic View Post
54x 756 awarded to the last 3 classes of new hires. Is this the new normal?
I think so....

Here's why.

-No movement on the aircraft
- Trips can be tough on the body
- No movement on the aircraft
- not enough financial incentive (hello....where's the pay?)
-Long nights and short days
-No movement on the aircraft
-Improper B767-300 pay (WTF is up with that?)
- No movement on the aircraft
- Management wants to replace it, it's a dying fleet
-No movement on the aircraft
-Some pretty challenging trips/destinations
-No movement on the aircraft

Lack of financial incentive + no movement + reduced QoL = New hires can have it!
baseball is offline  
Old 03-06-2019, 06:06 PM
  #129  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2007
Posts: 459
Default

Originally Posted by baseball View Post
I think so....

Here's why.

-No movement on the aircraft
- Trips can be tough on the body
- No movement on the aircraft
- not enough financial incentive (hello....where's the pay?)
-Long nights and short days
-No movement on the aircraft
-Improper B767-300 pay (WTF is up with that?)
- No movement on the aircraft
- Management wants to replace it, it's a dying fleet
-No movement on the aircraft
-Some pretty challenging trips/destinations
-No movement on the aircraft

Lack of financial incentive + no movement + reduced QoL = New hires can have it!



Pretty much, except for the challenging trips/destinations. At least regarding EWR flying, rolling out on an ILS to a 10,000' runway is a ***** ain't it?
Spicy McHaggis is offline  
Old 03-06-2019, 06:14 PM
  #130  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Posts: 662
Default

Originally Posted by ChalupaBatman View Post
But the dude has his whole career to fly that pig, why not enjoy the Cadillac while it’s still here?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
It’s not really a Cadillac. Often times it’s still the same loud hurricane as the 737 with more Ewr Marriotts. The 767 is quieter, and less annoying cockpit airflow, but the time it takes to be a lineholder with purely 67 trips is several years. Probably more than it takes to get a 777 bid. I really think it’s a mistake to take a 756 at Indoc with 737 or 320 on the board.
webecheck is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Poeman
FedEx
1140
02-22-2022 03:37 PM
ebuhoner
Regional
282
07-06-2016 11:37 AM
MasterOfPuppets
United
20
01-21-2016 08:31 PM
Sunvox
Major
175
10-23-2015 04:46 PM
Seggy
United
164
07-19-2015 08:27 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices