New (used) aircraft coming + other rumors
#41
Seems odd the company would seek to reinvent the wheel 3 hours up I-71.
#42
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Mar 2017
Posts: 194
Again, why not RFD or DFW? Both are center-of-country (ish), already have sort facilities, aren't too far from significant ground ops and are less likely to be impacted at the same time as a front hitting the primary sort.
Seems odd the company would seek to reinvent the wheel 3 hours up I-71.
Seems odd the company would seek to reinvent the wheel 3 hours up I-71.
What they really want is a third N/S runway in SDF, but even the company realizes that aint happening with what would be required to make it a reality.
#43
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Position: MD CA
Posts: 705
It needs to be a short driving distance from SDF. Call SJ yourself and ask him what he's been working on during his TDY "special assignment".
What they really want is a third N/S runway in SDF, but even the company realizes that aint happening with what would be required to make it a reality.
What they really want is a third N/S runway in SDF, but even the company realizes that aint happening with what would be required to make it a reality.
Typical ground inbreed manager decisions. Just like the 747-8, when everyone in the World knows the 777 is the best platform. But they are too cheap. Always have been.
#44
Again, why not RFD or DFW? Both are center-of-country (ish), already have sort facilities, aren't too far from significant ground ops and are less likely to be impacted at the same time as a front hitting the primary sort.
Seems odd the company would seek to reinvent the wheel 3 hours up I-71.
Seems odd the company would seek to reinvent the wheel 3 hours up I-71.
AFW, however...railhead on one side, interstate highway on the other, plentiful labor, and a business friendly environment. The former AA hangar would have been a great facility to keep maintenance intensive aircraft (MDs) limping throughout the system. Plus you could reach just about any U.S. gateway (HNL would be a slight stretch), all the major Canadian gateways, and easily access much of Central and South America.
Additionally, there is a lot less traffic in/out of AFW, versus DFW.
RB
Last edited by RickyBobby; 03-27-2017 at 05:35 PM.
#46
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Position: MD CA
Posts: 705
One was a UPS acquisitions manager saying it was. He said it was the best platform out there today. That was a year ago. Money changes ATL's mind real quick.
And I guess to back that up, almost all new orders from Freight companies the past years have been for the 777F. So these mangers have done the homework and almost all have gone with the 777F.
Southern Air, FDX, Saudia, Qatar, TNT, Lufthansa, Korean, ANA, LAT Chile, Etihad, Emirates, Aero Logic, China Southern, Air France, Air China, etc.
But these airlines were willing to spend the $. I'm sure UPS stole the 747-8. This is why they bought it. Hopefully they surprise us all, and they order the 777F, but I don't believe the rumor on this one. Maybe the 777-200ER-bcf, since they can also get for a song.
And I guess to back that up, almost all new orders from Freight companies the past years have been for the 777F. So these mangers have done the homework and almost all have gone with the 777F.
Southern Air, FDX, Saudia, Qatar, TNT, Lufthansa, Korean, ANA, LAT Chile, Etihad, Emirates, Aero Logic, China Southern, Air France, Air China, etc.
But these airlines were willing to spend the $. I'm sure UPS stole the 747-8. This is why they bought it. Hopefully they surprise us all, and they order the 777F, but I don't believe the rumor on this one. Maybe the 777-200ER-bcf, since they can also get for a song.
#47
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: May 2006
Posts: 429
One was a UPS acquisitions manager saying it was. He said it was the best platform out there today. That was a year ago. Money changes ATL's mind real quick.
And I guess to back that up, almost all new orders from Freight companies the past years have been for the 777F. So these mangers have done the homework and almost all have gone with the 777F.
Southern Air, FDX, Saudia, Qatar, TNT, Lufthansa, Korean, ANA, LAT Chile, Etihad, Emirates, Aero Logic, China Southern, Air France, Air China, etc.
But these airlines were willing to spend the $. I'm sure UPS stole the 747-8. This is why they bought it. Hopefully they surprise us all, and they order the 777F, but I don't believe the rumor on this one. Maybe the 777-200ER-bcf, since they can also get for a song.
And I guess to back that up, almost all new orders from Freight companies the past years have been for the 777F. So these mangers have done the homework and almost all have gone with the 777F.
Southern Air, FDX, Saudia, Qatar, TNT, Lufthansa, Korean, ANA, LAT Chile, Etihad, Emirates, Aero Logic, China Southern, Air France, Air China, etc.
But these airlines were willing to spend the $. I'm sure UPS stole the 747-8. This is why they bought it. Hopefully they surprise us all, and they order the 777F, but I don't believe the rumor on this one. Maybe the 777-200ER-bcf, since they can also get for a song.
Last edited by mrvmo; 03-27-2017 at 11:37 PM.
#48
Again, why not RFD or DFW? Both are center-of-country (ish), already have sort facilities, aren't too far from significant ground ops and are less likely to be impacted at the same time as a front hitting the primary sort.
Seems odd the company would seek to reinvent the wheel 3 hours up I-71.
Seems odd the company would seek to reinvent the wheel 3 hours up I-71.
They might also attempt to consider KLCK as a co-domicile. That 3 hour (210 mile) "limo" ride would make for some real ass pain before/after a duty period.
If you don't even consider this crap could happen, then you must be new here. They do "odd" things here on a daily basis.
#49
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2014
Posts: 176
Im sure UPS got the Ocho for a steal. I think there were some other factors involved too.
Everybody wants to save money on twins. 1987 UPS was launch customer for the 757 PF instead of buying up more 727's 30 years later, FDX is buying every frame it can find now. 1995 UPS was the launch customer for the 767 PF. Instead of buying up MD's Again FDX is buying them to replace the 10/11 fleets now. Other carriers (Amazon) are buying up 76's
The T7 is great on economics with 330 min ETOPs. You are seeing carriers that flew the MD buying them. The 744 buying them. UPS does their homework for the most part (a-300 deal). I expect a T7 order to eventually replace the MD. Honest opinion 330 minute ETOPs in a twin is scary. Just for safety factors I'd rather have the extra engines. ETOP's Regs are not permenant. If engine incidents start occurring the FAA will pull back the 330 min guaranteed. There goes any economic saving you may have had right out the cargo door.
Everybody wants to save money on twins. 1987 UPS was launch customer for the 757 PF instead of buying up more 727's 30 years later, FDX is buying every frame it can find now. 1995 UPS was the launch customer for the 767 PF. Instead of buying up MD's Again FDX is buying them to replace the 10/11 fleets now. Other carriers (Amazon) are buying up 76's
The T7 is great on economics with 330 min ETOPs. You are seeing carriers that flew the MD buying them. The 744 buying them. UPS does their homework for the most part (a-300 deal). I expect a T7 order to eventually replace the MD. Honest opinion 330 minute ETOPs in a twin is scary. Just for safety factors I'd rather have the extra engines. ETOP's Regs are not permenant. If engine incidents start occurring the FAA will pull back the 330 min guaranteed. There goes any economic saving you may have had right out the cargo door.
#50
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2014
Posts: 176
RFD and DFW are too far ground ops to the North East. KLCK can be trucked to the majority of the east within 2 days and a couple hours ground from SDF.
FDX uses AFW as a hub. Correct DFW is tight. Last Thursday afternoon I think every position on the ramp had equipment parked in it. There is room, not much to expand the ramp to the north at DFW.
FDX uses AFW as a hub. Correct DFW is tight. Last Thursday afternoon I think every position on the ramp had equipment parked in it. There is room, not much to expand the ramp to the north at DFW.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post