Search

Notices

Contract convo

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-08-2024 | 06:12 PM
  #91  
Config 3
 
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 1,289
Likes: 193
Default

Originally Posted by Brownose74
funny thing is justinsane is a HUGE yea voter for the FedEx TA. Ironically now she’s defending the no vote LOL. Guy looks more like a clown everyday. Definitely has gone down the deep end.
Watching Justin try to argue with Boiler is like watching the Park County Pee Wee hockey team play the Detroit Red Wings.
Reply
Old 06-08-2024 | 06:25 PM
  #92  
Line Holder
 
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 779
Likes: 28
Default

Originally Posted by ClncClarence
Watching Justin try to argue with Boiler is like watching the Park County Pee Wee hockey team play the Detroit Red Wings.
Except in this case you're hoping Boiler will to ahead and run up the score.
Reply
Old 06-12-2024 | 06:03 PM
  #93  
767pilot's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,702
Likes: 0
From: 767 captain
Default

Originally Posted by skek
What makes you think it won’t be a signing bonus like the last 2 contracts?
Everything is negotiable. It can depend on how badly one side or the other wants to sell the thing
Reply
Old 06-13-2024 | 09:06 AM
  #94  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by 767pilot
Everything is negotiable. It can depend on how badly one side or the other wants to sell the thing
well unless this drags out for years a signing bonus will be advantageous to retro pay.
Reply
Old 06-16-2024 | 08:41 AM
  #95  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Aug 2023
Posts: 698
Likes: 55
Default

Originally Posted by BoilerUP
I do think the extensions were a good thing, given the specific circumstances at the time each was ratified. Knowning what I know now, I would still vote in favor of both again tomorrow as I believe our position to achieve parity is better than where FDX currently lies.

Do I wish the extensions had higher percentage raises, especially 2022? Yes, but they were contract extensions not full-term contracts and they didn't. Do I wish they had other times besides pay/pension (and vacation language in 2020)? Yes, but they were contract extensions not full-term contracts and they didn't.

Of COURSE what happens at UPS impacts FDX and what happens at FDX impacts UPS, ever said otherwise...but what happens elsewhere in the industry matters too. I think you are trying to "ah-ha!" us on our 2021 payrate (ratified in early 2020) while absolving yourself on 2023 payrates (ratified earlier that year) without regard to what happened in between.

So STIPULATED, Extension 2020 didn't immediately achieve an industry leading payrate - though it did in Extension 2020's final year.

Contract 2016 had its last raise on 1Sept20 of $337.56. Extension 2020 brought that up 4% to $351.16 on 1Sept21, which was $2.69/0.77% behind Delta's 1Jan19 A350 rate of $353.85. Yup, we didn't raise the bar on that 4% extension, but we did come in at $361.69 for 1Sept22 which was industry leading at that time. Then later the Company said they weren't going to talk to us during Teamsters, which lead to Extension 2022 which took that industry leading 1Sept22 payrate and increased it 4%/3.25%/3.25% - not earth shattering by any means especially given COVID, but raising the bar for the industry all the same.

I would submit if FDX's TA2023 DOS WB rate only lagged the industry leading rates by 0.77%, it would have overwhelmingly passed regardless of scope, R24 to R16, retirement splitting, etc. Instead, FDX TA2023 DOS WB rates lagged the industry leader by 8.38% ($35.01/hr), to say nothing of the gap between FDX NB rates and Delta 757/321 rates.

This ain't the droid you're looking for Broseph, but I'll leave you the last word on the topic...
You are right, we should be working together. The discussion was about retro pay, and you decided to bring up Fedex and what we are going through. If you don't think that your "industry leading" rates had any impact, that is your opinion. That fact is, Delta's 2019 rate was higher than your 2021 rate that you agreed to in 2020. In 2022, Delta's rate adjusted for inflation would have been $415 when your TA/extension came out. Yet, it was overwhelmingly approved even though your top rate in 2025 was below the inflation adjusted Delta rate for 2022. My opinion is that wasn't industry leading.

It is funny to see some on here who stated in 2022 that the 2020 extension was a mistake and now defend it (not you Boiler). I hope you are able to negotiate a 2025 rate that exceeds the current rates at the legacies. If not, I hope your 2026 rate exceeds their $474 rate and you get retro or a signing bonus that makes up for the difference since 2023. You will have known those rates for 18 months+, so there shouldn't be an issue with exceeding them.
Reply
Old 06-17-2024 | 01:34 AM
  #96  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 292
Likes: 46
Default

Originally Posted by JustInFacts
You are right, we should be working together. The discussion was about retro pay, and you decided to bring up Fedex and what we are going through. If you don't think that your "industry leading" rates had any impact, that is your opinion. That fact is, Delta's 2019 rate was higher than your 2021 rate that you agreed to in 2020. In 2022, Delta's rate adjusted for inflation would have been $415 when your TA/extension came out. Yet, it was overwhelmingly approved even though your top rate in 2025 was below the inflation adjusted Delta rate for 2022. My opinion is that wasn't industry leading.

It is funny to see some on here who stated in 2022 that the 2020 extension was a mistake and now defend it (not you Boiler). I hope you are able to negotiate a 2025 rate that exceeds the current rates at the legacies. If not, I hope your 2026 rate exceeds their $474 rate and you get retro or a signing bonus that makes up for the difference since 2023. You will have known those rates for 18 months+, so there shouldn't be an issue with exceeding them.
Adjusted for inflation?
Reply
Old 06-17-2024 | 08:36 AM
  #97  
BoilerUP's Avatar
Doing One Pilot's Job
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 7,886
Likes: 121
Default

Originally Posted by Grease
Adjusted for inflation?
FDX's Contract 2015 had the Nov 2020 top rate at $335.56; their TA2023 top payrate effective Aug 2023 would have been $382.53



FDX ALPA failed to not only match actual Delta payrates ratified months earlier in full-term contract TA, they came 3.5% short of adjusting their current payrate for inflation at DOS.

But hey, that's really neither here nor there...FDX ALPA is negotiating an eventual TA2, and the IPA is now negotiating a future Contract 202x. Here's to hoping both pilot groups can give their leaders/negotiators the support necessary to attain industry-leading agreements that pattern off the passenger contracts ratfied in 2023.
Reply
Old 06-17-2024 | 01:32 PM
  #98  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Aug 2023
Posts: 698
Likes: 55
Default

Originally Posted by BoilerUP
FDX's Contract 2015 had the Nov 2020 top rate at $335.56; their TA2023 top payrate effective Aug 2023 would have been $382.53
https://imgur.com/ELvbRnp
https://i.imgur.com/ELvbRnp.jpeg

FDX ALPA failed to not only match actual Delta payrates ratified months earlier in full-term contract TA, they came 3.5% short of adjusting their current payrate for inflation at DOS.

But hey, that's really neither here nor there...FDX ALPA is negotiating an eventual TA2, and the IPA is now negotiating a future Contract 202x. Here's to hoping both pilot groups can give their leaders/negotiators the support necessary to attain industry-leading agreements that pattern off the passenger contracts ratfied in 2023.
Not disputing that, however, you conveniantly left out that IPA presented you with a second contract extension in 2022. Your 2020 pay rate adjusted for inflation in June of 2022 would have been $384. The industry leading extension that you approved in 2022 had a September 2023 pay rate of $375, which is below your inflation adjusted pay rate from 2020 a year later.

It's nice of you to point to fedex to justify your problems, however it isn't new. UPS has blamed Fedex for their rates before, even though UPS had their TA first. Funny how it only works one way.

I'll leave the last word for you Brosef. I,,, actually mean it.
Reply
Old 06-17-2024 | 03:43 PM
  #99  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Oct 2023
Posts: 491
Likes: 289
Default

Originally Posted by JustInFacts
Not disputing that, however, you conveniantly left out that IPA presented you with a second contract extension in 2022. Your 2020 pay rate adjusted for inflation in June of 2022 would have been $384. The industry leading extension that you approved in 2022 had a September 2023 pay rate of $375, which is below your inflation adjusted pay rate from 2020 a year later.

It's nice of you to point to fedex to justify your problems, however it isn't new. UPS has blamed Fedex for their rates before, even though UPS had their TA first. Funny how it only works one way.

I'll leave the last word for you Brosef. I,,, actually mean it.
Hey man, you bring up some interesting points & there are a few of us here at Brown that agree that the extensions were a misstep , whether in hindsight after voting for them, or initially, as they were presented. But you seem to be insisting on creating a conflict that really isn't there. You say UPS has blamed FedEx for their rates in the past. Who, exactly are you talking about? Sure, we may have a few folks who lash out at Purple when negotiations fail to meet expectations (seems like you're kinda doing the same thing from your side), but the vast majority of us wish nothing but the best for you guys. It appears you are facing some structural issues both within your union, and with the way your company has been managed. We're glad you're addressing those things and we're all pulling for you to knock the next contract out of the park. There's no need to turn this into an us vs them food fight. We're all trying to make the best decisions we can with the info available to us & within the confines of the RLA. The goals of our groups are the same & this isn't a zero sum game where we benefit when you lose. Quite the opposite actually. Wish you guys all the best.
Reply
Old 06-17-2024 | 06:54 PM
  #100  
MoosePileit's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 535
Likes: 0
From: The IPA EB speaks for me
Default

"Contract" and "adjust for inflation" was a bit of a stretch, even after a week.

Thanks for the chuckle!

Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
White Cap
Cargo
49
09-26-2019 06:11 PM
Flyrr
Flexjet
20
04-30-2018 08:00 AM
jsled
United
7
11-28-2012 11:08 PM
ea500driver
Union Talk
26
06-26-2010 09:54 AM
BoredwLife
Major
1
07-16-2008 01:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices