Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Cargo > UPS
Company motivation to agree on Contract >

Company motivation to agree on Contract

Search

Notices

Company motivation to agree on Contract

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-21-2026 | 11:27 AM
  #31  
Swedish Blender's Avatar
Where's my Mai Tai?
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,821
Likes: 13
From: fins to the left, fins to the right
Default

Originally Posted by BoilerUP
With both extensions, we'd need 24.25% at DOS to match DAL/UAL Jan 2027 rates. Compared to the ginormous percentage of FDX's DOS rate increase, that provides a lot of relative "pie" on a per-pilot basis to devote toward other articles, including scheduling.
I hope we are not planning on matching Delta as they have already exchanged openers for their next contract.

We need to aim higher.
Reply
Old 04-21-2026 | 11:33 AM
  #32  
maxing the min/Moderator
20 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,605
Likes: 15
From: 757
Default

Originally Posted by Swedish Blender
I hope we are not planning on matching Delta as they have already exchanged openers for their next contract.

We need to aim higher.
Im sure the unions have talked and we are fully aware
Reply
Old 04-21-2026 | 11:33 AM
  #33  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 283
Likes: 17
Default

Originally Posted by Swedish Blender
I hope we are not planning on matching Delta as they have already exchanged openers for their next contract.

We need to aim higher.
We will definitely have to aim higher, because the bar will be reset in short order.
Reply
Old 04-21-2026 | 07:10 PM
  #34  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Jan 2026
Posts: 17
Likes: 4
Default

Originally Posted by Grease
We will definitely have to aim higher, because the bar will be reset in short order.
What makes you think the legacies are walking into the same environment that produced the last round of contracts?

Fuel costs have moved higher again, some airlines are already trimming growth, and there’s more focus on protecting margins than expanding at all costs. That’s happening now, not hypothetically.

At the same time, they’re carrying significantly higher fixed labor costs from the last round of deals, which were negotiated during one of the strongest demand environments the industry has ever seen.

Demand still looks solid, but the landscape is clearly shifting from expansion toward cost control.

Personally, I think expecting another quick cycle of outsized gains like we saw post-COVID is optimistic. The current environment looks materially different than the one that produced those contracts.
Reply
Old Yesterday | 05:49 AM
  #35  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 283
Likes: 17
Default

Originally Posted by ramp9
What makes you think the legacies are walking into the same environment that produced the last round of contracts?

Fuel costs have moved higher again, some airlines are already trimming growth, and there’s more focus on protecting margins than expanding at all costs. That’s happening now, not hypothetically.

At the same time, they’re carrying significantly higher fixed labor costs from the last round of deals, which were negotiated during one of the strongest demand environments the industry has ever seen.

Demand still looks solid, but the landscape is clearly shifting from expansion toward cost control.

Personally, I think expecting another quick cycle of outsized gains like we saw post-COVID is optimistic. The current environment looks materially different than the one that produced those contracts.
I don’t have any in-depth industry analysis to rely on, but Delta seems to still be hiring like crazy and they are competing for qualified pilots with the other legacies.
Reply
Old Yesterday | 09:11 AM
  #36  
Swedish Blender's Avatar
Where's my Mai Tai?
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,821
Likes: 13
From: fins to the left, fins to the right
Default

Originally Posted by ramp9
Personally, I think expecting another quick cycle of outsized gains like we saw post-COVID is optimistic. The current environment looks materially different than the one that produced those contracts.
I don’t think it will be an outsized gain like last time. It doesn’t have to be though. A 10% raise at DOS would put them at $548 for the top rate and go from there.
Reply
Old Yesterday | 01:26 PM
  #37  
tnkrdrvr's Avatar
Thread Starter
Living the SloBus life
Veteran: Air Force
5 Years
On Reserve
20 Countries Visited
 
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 2,165
Likes: 89
Default

Originally Posted by Swedish Blender
I don’t think it will be an outsized gain like last time. It doesn’t have to be though. A 10% raise at DOS would put them at $548 for the top rate and go from there.
My guess is 5% and than 3%/yr for the remainder of the contract (final top rate around $590) at the legacies. They’ll probably work on vacation and work rules as well. My impression is that they don’t see retirement as a major area of need anymore since every pay raise automatically increases what 18% plus cash over cap pays out.
Reply
Old Yesterday | 03:20 PM
  #38  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Oct 2023
Posts: 464
Likes: 212
Default

Originally Posted by ramp9
What makes you think the legacies are walking into the same environment that produced the last round of contracts?

Fuel costs have moved higher again, some airlines are already trimming growth, and there’s more focus on protecting margins than expanding at all costs. That’s happening now, not hypothetically.

At the same time, they’re carrying significantly higher fixed labor costs from the last round of deals, which were negotiated during one of the strongest demand environments the industry has ever seen.

Demand still looks solid, but the landscape is clearly shifting from expansion toward cost control.

Personally, I think expecting another quick cycle of outsized gains like we saw post-COVID is optimistic. The current environment looks materially different than the one that produced those contracts.
Well, they ain’t going backwards. We clearly need to be aiming at legacy pay rates plus some percentage in order to maintain competitiveness. A snap up clause would be great, but I don’t have my hopes up as FedEx failed to secure one. Of course, that’s all before we even talk about trip trades, trip change premiums, minimizing circadian shifts, adding 117 equivalent protections, a retirement bump, cash over cap, etc. You get the idea…it’s a long list, and while we certainly won’t get all of it, it’s going to take a solid 90% of what I just mentioned and then some to earn my yes vote. Make no mistake; for a whole lot of us ‘newer than 2014’ folk, this contract is going to have to be fairly epic for us to vote it in. “Best we could negotiate” and “there’s only so big a slice of the pie” excuses won’t cut it this time around.
Reply
Old Yesterday | 03:49 PM
  #39  
tnkrdrvr's Avatar
Thread Starter
Living the SloBus life
Veteran: Air Force
5 Years
On Reserve
20 Countries Visited
 
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 2,165
Likes: 89
Default

Originally Posted by Lowslung
Well, they ain’t going backwards. We clearly need to be aiming at legacy pay rates plus some percentage in order to maintain competitiveness. A snap up clause would be great, but I don’t have my hopes up as FedEx failed to secure one. Of course, that’s all before we even talk about trip trades, trip change premiums, minimizing circadian shifts, adding 117 equivalent protections, a retirement bump, cash over cap, etc. You get the idea…it’s a long list, and while we certainly won’t get all of it, it’s going to take a solid 90% of what I just mentioned and then some to earn my yes vote. Make no mistake; for a whole lot of us ‘newer than 2014’ folk, this contract is going to have to be fairly epic for us to vote it in. “Best we could negotiate” and “there’s only so big a slice of the pie” excuses won’t cut it this time around.
As a post 2014 hire, I agree that patience is wearing thin with many aspects of this job. Mediocre, at best, hotels, lagging pay (relative to legacies, inflation, and soon FedEx), lagging pension (relative to both inflation and now FedEx), 15 yr instead of 12 yr pay tables, no cash over cap, miserably lagging line construction, lagging trip trade system, lagging Reserve rules, lagging reschedule protections, and a worn out fleet. Obviously, some things are completely out of the EB’s and NC’s hands, but some things are their job to obtain for us at the negotiating table.
Reply
Old Today | 02:39 AM
  #40  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jun 2017
Posts: 429
Likes: 8
From: B767
Default

Originally Posted by tnkrdrvr
As a post 2014 hire, I agree that patience is wearing thin with many aspects of this job. Mediocre, at best, hotels, lagging pay (relative to legacies, inflation, and soon FedEx), lagging pension (relative to both inflation and now FedEx), 15 yr instead of 12 yr pay tables, no cash over cap, miserably lagging line construction, lagging trip trade system, lagging Reserve rules, lagging reschedule protections, and a worn out fleet. Obviously, some things are completely out of the EB’s and NC’s hands, but some things are their job to obtain for us at the negotiating table.
another post 2014 hire here that agrees, there is nothing to give back this time around.
Everything is compounded by the treatment we receive from QA, crew scheduling, etc…
The scheduling department is run worse than a regional or ACMI…
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Cheddar
American
88
07-17-2018 03:55 PM
gzsg
Delta
41
10-12-2016 12:06 PM
1Seat 1Engine
Southwest
8
11-03-2015 10:37 AM
A321
American
89
01-28-2015 06:55 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices