LUS third listers
06-30-2015, 06:27 AM
#1
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Nov 2011
Position: A320 Capt
Posts: 5,293
LUS third listers
How do you guys feel about this? You know what the west committee thinks of you. Would you be happy letting the west committee represent you as one westie suggested?
It might be a idea to let your APA officers know you want your MB rights.
It might be a idea to let your APA officers know you want your MB rights.
06-30-2015, 06:34 AM
#2
Gets Summer Off
Joined APC: May 2009
Position: AA
Posts: 667
Originally Posted by R57 relay
How do you guys feel about this? You know what the west committee thinks of you. Would you be happy letting the west committee represent you as one westie suggested?
06-30-2015, 06:34 AM
#3
Unfaithfully yours, Hank
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Position: All
Posts: 222
Why can't the east committee represent the LUS third listers? Honest question.I know they walked away because they didn't want to advocate the Nic, but by doing so they left their third listers high and dry.
06-30-2015, 06:38 AM
#4
Line Holder
Joined APC: Nov 2013
Position: Low
Posts: 34
LUS third listers
Originally Posted by R57 relay
How do you guys feel about this? You know what the west committee thinks of you. Would you be happy letting the west committee represent you as one westie suggested?
It might be a idea to let your APA officers know you want your MB rights.
It might be a idea to let your APA officers know you want your MB rights.
The West committee will get the third listers a far better deal in the integration with LAA then the East committee or USAPA ever could.
The fact that USAPA/East committee put 3rd listers ahead of West pilots with uninterrupted service from 2003 was never going to fly. The only reason 3rd listers have experienced the movement they have was the fact they were placed on the East and TA separate ops.
The third listers should be concerned that USAPA/East is playing games, but the West proposal takes care of them in a realistic way. News to the Easties here but the West has third listers too.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
06-30-2015, 06:41 AM
#6
Weekend workaholic
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Position: A320 CA
Posts: 669
Originally Posted by R57 relay
How do you guys feel about this? You know what the west committee thinks of you. Would you be happy letting the west committee represent you as one westie suggested?
It might be a idea to let your APA officers know you want your MB rights.
It might be a idea to let your APA officers know you want your MB rights.
06-30-2015, 06:44 AM
#7
Line Holder
Joined APC: Mar 2014
Posts: 90
R57,
There are a few of us 3Ls that actually did better on the West's proposal vs the East's. The West merger committee has no issue with 3L pilots, just as long as we are slotted in DOH after the pre-merger AWE & US Airways pilots. I seen no problem with that logic. When USAPA was running around, I sure didn't feel like they had our (3L pilots) best interest in mind. I know many of our captains are worried, but your civil war regarding the NIC does not concern us.
GHOST
There are a few of us 3Ls that actually did better on the West's proposal vs the East's. The West merger committee has no issue with 3L pilots, just as long as we are slotted in DOH after the pre-merger AWE & US Airways pilots. I seen no problem with that logic. When USAPA was running around, I sure didn't feel like they had our (3L pilots) best interest in mind. I know many of our captains are worried, but your civil war regarding the NIC does not concern us.
GHOST
06-30-2015, 06:45 AM
#8
Gets Summer Off
Joined APC: May 2009
Position: AA
Posts: 667
Originally Posted by cactus320
The West committee will get the third listers a far better deal in the integration with LAA then the East committee or USAPA ever could.
The fact that USAPA/East committee put 3rd listers ahead of West pilots with uninterrupted service from 2003 was never going to fly. The only reason 3rd listers have experienced the movement they have was the fact they were placed on the East and TA separate ops.
The third listers should be concerned that USAPA/East is playing games, but the West proposal takes care of them in a realistic way. News to the Easties here but the West has third listers too.
The fact that USAPA/East committee put 3rd listers ahead of West pilots with uninterrupted service from 2003 was never going to fly. The only reason 3rd listers have experienced the movement they have was the fact they were placed on the East and TA separate ops.
The third listers should be concerned that USAPA/East is playing games, but the West proposal takes care of them in a realistic way. News to the Easties here but the West has third listers too.
06-30-2015, 06:50 AM
#9
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2013
Posts: 1,764
Originally Posted by Al Czervik
57.... A lot of third listers did better on the AWA list than the USAPA list. A lot are also EXTREMELY disenchanted with USAPA. It's time to move forward.
Time to move on. Everybody wants to tell me their heartbreaking story and justify their anger, yet nobody ever asked me the crap I went through.
Regarding the list, there is a approximately 200 number difference between East and West, and a 1700 number fifference between East and APA.
USAPA? Different name, same crap. Unions are unions, althogh I am VERY disappointed with APA, mainly because of the j/s issue and their $3600 dinner feast.
* this was my personal experience. I am not taking any sides.
06-30-2015, 06:54 AM
#10
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Nov 2011
Position: A320 Capt
Posts: 5,293
Have you guys really looked at the west proposal? Have you looked at the LAA? Now think about the LAA if they have to put guys that don't bing a captain seat to this merger in the captain range.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
