Search
Notices

15-01v

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-03-2014, 08:42 AM
  #151  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2013
Position: Gets weekends off
Posts: 1,168
Default

Originally Posted by XHooker View Post
In addition, why would you negotiate your highest pay for a plane you know to begin going away within the span of the next contract?
What you're saying is "Screw the 747 guys. Its fenced so I can't fly it anyway. Plus it will be gone in 2022 which is like 'tomorrow'."

Except those guys who will fly it for the next 8 years at a reduced pay rate so that the 787 pilots could get more relative pay.
pilot64golfer is offline  
Old 09-03-2014, 08:55 AM
  #152  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,083
Default

Originally Posted by Pkcola View Post
Money was taken from the 319/320...
Originally Posted by XHooker View Post
Care to explain how money was taken from the Bus?
Originally Posted by Pkcola View Post
Yes, the 319 pays 8.00 an hour less that the 737/320.
A319/318 pay is the same as the 737-700. I'm not saying I think our paybands are exactly the way I would do them, but let's keep the facts straight.

Originally Posted by Pkcola View Post
Dying fleets or not - these airplanes are going to be the mainstay for some time. To artificially inflate the importance of the 787 has cost many that will never see the 2 airplane fleet in your vision. What year does your vision come to fruition.

It's in our best interest to get the most for our guys flying airplanes on the property TODAY. At what point do the guys flying current planes get a chance to fly those inflated 787's. Dollar wise - if it takes 10 years to get there we(majority of United pilots) lost money.

Do you have another reason to protect the 787????? It couldn't be selfish, could it?
Look, my only point in going down this road with you is to counter the often heard refrain that paybands were foisted upon us by CALALPA for SLI purposes. There's no doubt in my mind both sides wanted to protect their pilots when the bands were constructed. Why did LUAL all of a sudden want the 747 in a separate band? In any event, it's all water under the bridge and time to look forward. Personally, I want the airplanes of the future to pay as much as possible. As to your last question, no dog in this fight, just trying to keep the record straight.
XHooker is offline  
Old 09-03-2014, 09:05 AM
  #153  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,083
Default

Originally Posted by pilot64golfer View Post
What you're saying is "Screw the 747 guys. Its fenced so I can't fly it anyway. Plus it will be gone in 2022 which is like 'tomorrow'."

Except those guys who will fly it for the next 8 years at a reduced pay rate so that the 787 pilots could get more relative pay.
I'm not saying "screw the 747 guys" anymore than you're saying "screw everyone else." The fences come down in a couple of years and the 747 will probably be gone around the time I can hold WB CA, so from that aspect it's irrelevant to me. It's all a question of how we want to cut the pie. I just don't see the logic of putting pay for a plane scheduled to be phased out over the life of the next contract above everything else, when it wasn't above everything else at the time of the merger.
XHooker is offline  
Old 09-03-2014, 09:28 AM
  #154  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2012
Posts: 341
Default

Originally Posted by XHooker View Post
Joe, I think the transition from longevity to pay bands occurred with Contract 97. The reason I remember this is because I was a new hire DC-10 engineer and remember the front seaters talking about the transition when the vote was going on and how it created a true "flush bid." I agree it's both conjecture as to the reason for the bands and irrelevant to the discussion at hand.
Yes, Xhooker, the way I remember it was Contract 97 was the same way you do from one of your earlier posts!! You asked how you remember Jan. 25, 1998? Well that just happened to be the day of one of the BEST Super Bowls ever!! Denver vs. Green Bay with Denver winning it ALL!! It also was the day before Delta was going to announce the Acquisition/Merger with CAL. (You can correct me if I'm wrong but I don't think I am! It's been almost 20 yrs and I'm having trouble remember 20 days!! ) The reason I stated Pay banding motivation was for future Mergers was because that is what I was told during the Road show. It wasn't to be an advantage like Pkcola keeps repeating over and over it was to make the integration easier. That was my understanding only, from said negotiators! There is a great article that may still be available in the Wall Street Journal archives that explained the DAL merger and how the pilots submarined it! You've done a good job I think explaining pay banding and the mentally of its use. I just think Pkcola is 3 french fries short of a full "Happy Meal!!" p.s.- Pkcola I just apologized for using the wrong term in prior post not for it's content! So you can quit quoting me now!! But, I think you already knew that!!
Really is offline  
Old 09-03-2014, 09:37 AM
  #155  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2012
Posts: 222
Default

Paybanding is for the "I want it now...dang it, I deserve it crowd."
tkhayes90 is offline  
Old 09-03-2014, 10:17 AM
  #156  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2012
Posts: 341
Default

Originally Posted by tkhayes90 View Post
Paybanding is for the "I want it now...dang it, I deserve it crowd."
Not sure what you mean by that? But, I guess that means you belong to the "Longevity - Look mine is BIGGER than yours, so pay me more!!" crowd!!
Really is offline  
Old 09-03-2014, 10:40 AM
  #157  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2010
Posts: 3,071
Default

I can picture managements face when we propose bringing all pay rates up to WB levels and pay to longevity. Probably about the same face the arbitrators made when Brucia unveiled CAL's status seniority list.
SpecialTracking is offline  
Old 09-03-2014, 12:18 PM
  #158  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2010
Posts: 1,253
Default

Originally Posted by SpecialTracking View Post
I can picture managements face when we propose bringing all pay rates up to WB levels and pay to longevity. Probably about the same face the arbitrators made when Brucia unveiled CAL's status seniority list.
I can picture the knowing grins the management guys will exchange when our openers inflate the pay scale of the holy whale. Just more motivation to send them to the desert. Btw Delta is parking four of them. Think Jeff won't do similar if his bean counter formula dictates it?
intrepidcv11 is offline  
Old 09-03-2014, 12:20 PM
  #159  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2012
Posts: 341
Default

Originally Posted by SpecialTracking View Post
I can picture managements face when we propose bringing all pay rates up to WB levels and pay to longevity. Probably about the same face the arbitrators made when Brucia unveiled CAL's status seniority list.
You know the sad thing is we could bring rates up to the A380 rates and pay longevity and a large group pilots would have that same disgusted look!! I'm not a pure Longevity pay guy, but I also don't believe in breaking pay down into each A/C. I don't want to feel pushed up the ladder. I can hold WB now but am happy to be on my little guppy flying to Portland and back. There needs to be different pay for size but, I'm glad it's not a big difference! JMO
Really is offline  
Old 09-03-2014, 12:49 PM
  #160  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2013
Position: Gets weekends off
Posts: 1,168
Default

Originally Posted by XHooker View Post
I'm not saying "screw the 747 guys" anymore than you're saying "screw everyone else." The fences come down in a couple of years and the 747 will probably be gone around the time I can hold WB CA, so from that aspect it's irrelevant to me. It's all a question of how we want to cut the pie. I just don't see the logic of putting pay for a plane scheduled to be phased out over the life of the next contract above everything else, when it wasn't above everything else at the time of the merger.
Same here. I won't hold 747 Captain until they are gone. The idea is to get premium pay for the replacement. Right now there aren't premium pay aircraft. We've banded those pay rates down.

I guess we will find out next contract.
pilot64golfer is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices