Originally Posted by tonsterboy5
(Post 3154955)
I know they fly it in every day, I didn’t know they used our hanger pad as a parking spot
|
Looks like ZW is hiring flight attendants. Could be a good sign for more pilot recalls?
|
Originally Posted by prt135
(Post 3155877)
Looks like ZW is hiring flight attendants. Could be a good sign for more pilot recalls?
|
Originally Posted by prt135
(Post 3155877)
Looks like ZW is hiring flight attendants. Could be a good sign for more pilot recalls?
|
I’m thinking of applying as an FA lol...if they need a pilot I’m already there 😋
|
Originally Posted by prt135
(Post 3155877)
Looks like ZW is hiring flight attendants. Could be a good sign for more pilot recalls?
|
Originally Posted by prt135
(Post 3155877)
Looks like ZW is hiring flight attendants. Could be a good sign for more pilot recalls?
|
Originally Posted by Imapylot
(Post 3156068)
They’re simultaneously hiring FAs and offering FAs TOWOP. Doesn’t make sense to me.
|
Originally Posted by tonsterboy5
(Post 3154855)
Anyone know anything good about the CRJ900 in delta colors parked in ATW?
|
Originally Posted by Imapylot
(Post 3156068)
They’re simultaneously hiring FAs and offering FAs TOWOP. Doesn’t make sense to me.
|
Originally Posted by squib
(Post 3156084)
They are having interviews starting next year with no projected staffing date. TOWOP is for current months schedules. Plus the turnover rate of flight attendants has always been an all time high because they don’t realize they are on call all day to fly to central wisconsin for min rest after their base just closed and did a two leg commute.
|
Originally Posted by IDriveJets
(Post 3155990)
I’m thinking of applying as an FA lol...if they need a pilot I’m already there 😋
|
And how did you get the internet all the way out in the 50s?
|
Originally Posted by idlethrust
(Post 3156168)
I’ll bet you look good in a skirt and heels 😂😂😂
|
It needs a push up bra.
|
Originally Posted by Seneca Pilot
(Post 3156228)
|
So nobody thinks the owner of Gojets sold the planes to cash out because he couldn't sell the operation as an equitable company, and AW or Mesa will be flying 550's leased from Skywest?
Kinda sounds like he sold them so he can ride off into the sunset, and is only leasing them back though the holidays for a smoother transition. I would think it's extremely risk to sell the planes and pump the proceeds back into an airline in the middle of Covid, especially after shutting two down. |
Originally Posted by Seneca Pilot
(Post 3156228)
|
Originally Posted by Happyflyer
(Post 3156786)
So nobody thinks the owner of Gojets sold the planes to cash out because he couldn't sell the operation as an equitable company, and AW or Mesa will be flying 550's leased from Skywest?
Kinda sounds like he sold them so he can ride off into the sunset, and is only leasing them back though the holidays for a smoother transition. I would think it's extremely risk to sell the planes and pump the proceeds back into an airline in the middle of Covid, especially after shutting two down. |
Originally Posted by brocklee9000
(Post 3156820)
That has been in the back of my mind since our earnings call. I don't know enough about Mesa's agreement with united, i.e. how scope limited they are. Since they seem to be taking more ERJs and trying to bring them to IAD as well, and it sounds like they're parking the 700s, I guess there's a chance the 550s could fit in at Mesa if they don't affect scope. However, AW still seemed like a more likely destination in my mind but that's just a wild guess. Mostly because of the effort to get the 700 on their cert, trying to develop a program, I'm sure they'd be eager to have them to help recall guys. Also already having an ORD base where GoJet has been flying the 550. I mean I guess mesa could try to set up ORD, but it just seems easier to AW already there. But again, that's just a wild guess. I never really thought they'd get the 737 over at Mesa, yet here we are in this timeline.
|
Originally Posted by tonsterboy5
(Post 3156907)
The scope issue now is for all RJ since they are limited to 100% of mainline NB hours.
|
Any updates on recalls? Are hours picking up any? Things looking better or worse (especially with the recent spike in covid cases nationwide)? 1500+ hour former Airman Trainee here waiting for the day I get that call to come in for training (tech interview passed, then covid struck). 41yr old career changer hoping they call my number before I age out :( - Fortunately I have a sugar momma to help me get by and a long list of students that keep me busy while I wait.
|
Originally Posted by flypilot
(Post 3157584)
Any updates on recalls? Are hours picking up any? Things looking better or worse (especially with the recent spike in covid cases nationwide)? 1500+ hour former Airman Trainee here waiting for the day I get that call to come in for training (tech interview passed, then covid struck). 41yr old career changer hoping they call my number before I age out :( - Fortunately I have a sugar momma to help me get by and a long list of students that keep me busy while I wait.
|
Checking to see if there are any more updates this month on flying, increase in hours, recalling furloughed pilots, etc. Any updates would be appreciated :)
|
Originally Posted by flypilot
(Post 3167925)
Checking to see if there are any more updates this month on flying, increase in hours, recalling furloughed pilots, etc. Any updates would be appreciated :)
|
Originally Posted by mcat
(Post 3167944)
Nope no news. Slight drop in January as flying traditionally slows at that time. We got a new jacket option though! Sorry man ☹️
|
Well no vacancy for January from what I hear from people. Honestly not waiting till March or April to get called back if that even happens with how things are going in the industry. There comes a point where the aggravation and desperation aren’t worth the dream anymore.
|
I was told recalls will probably not happen at all in the first quarter of 2021.
|
Has the company or union said anything on what might happen if this relief package passes in congress? There's a good deal of money for airlines in it
|
Originally Posted by GA2Jets
(Post 3172128)
Has the company or union said anything on what might happen if this relief package passes in congress? There's a good deal of money for airlines in it
|
Originally Posted by DarkSideMoon
(Post 3172130)
Not yet. Probably waiting for it to finalize. I feel like we’ve been “close” to another relief package since July. Fingers crossed that it’s good and it gets you all back on property.
|
Ain’t happening today and with Christmas next week, they’ll drag it out until after the new year I suspect but I hope I’m wrong.
I’m past my recurrency like many others so I’m guessing there will be some retraining involved if we get recalled? |
Originally Posted by IDriveJets
(Post 3172253)
Ain’t happening today and with Christmas next week, they’ll drag it out until after the new year I suspect but I hope I’m wrong.
I’m past my recurrency like many others so I’m guessing there will be some retraining involved if we get recalled?
Originally Posted by RabidW0mbat
if it doesn’t include recalling everyone and reupgrading all the downgrades, it will be a failure.
|
Since the company is planning on taking the latest round of govt money, that means that all furloughed pilots will be called back and paid retroactively from December 1st, correct?
|
Originally Posted by Imapylot
(Post 3173937)
Since the company is planning on taking the latest round of govt money, that means that all furloughed pilots will be called back and paid retroactively from December 1st, correct?
Pilots aren’t the only ones furloughed. We have maintenance staff, ground staff, office staff etc. Does it make sense to bring pilots back when the company is currently sufficiently staffed and meeting its obligations and pay them to sit reserve? Now they need to factor in cost of sending each person to the sim then most likely have them sit reserve. United has already said there’s no change to their current outlook until the end of Q1 2021. There is also no guarantee that consumer confidence or air travel will bounce back by March or April and this latest stimulus runs out March end so basically they can bring us back but if things don’t pick up we risk another furlough. Technically it’s cheaper to keep us pilots furloughed and bring back other people and start gearing up for the eventual return to demand by staffing other areas of operation gradually. I hope I’m wrong but we aren’t privy to a lot of internal details and workings of how this will fan out from an operational and business standpoint. Like I mentioned in one of my previous posts, we need a situation whereby the company has staffing issues for flying and HAS to bring us back. I was miserable about the furlough since September but I’ve accepted it and hope for the best while looking for other opportunities and riding the unemployment pony. |
Originally Posted by IDriveJets
(Post 3173972)
We have to look at it holistically from a business standpoint so to speak.
Pilots aren’t the only ones furloughed. We have maintenance staff, ground staff, office staff etc. Does it make sense to bring pilots back when the company is currently sufficiently staffed and meeting its obligations and pay them to sit reserve? Now they need to factor in cost of sending each person to the sim then most likely have them sit reserve. United has already said there’s no change to their current outlook until the end of Q1 2021. There is also no guarantee that consumer confidence or air travel will bounce back by March or April and this latest stimulus runs out March end so basically they can bring us back but if things don’t pick up we risk another furlough. Technically it’s cheaper to keep us pilots furloughed and bring back other people and start gearing up for the eventual return to demand by staffing other areas of operation gradually. I hope I’m wrong but we aren’t privy to a lot of internal details and workings of how this will fan out from an operational and business standpoint. Like I mentioned in one of my previous posts, we need a situation whereby the company has staffing issues for flying and HAS to bring us back. I was miserable about the furlough since September but I’ve accepted it and hope for the best while looking for other opportunities and riding the unemployment pony. So if they need to preserve cash in the short term, taking the money makes the most sense, even if they just put the furloughees on payroll and have them do nothing through March. |
Originally Posted by IDriveJets
(Post 3173972)
We have to look at it holistically from a business standpoint so to speak.
Pilots aren’t the only ones furloughed. We have maintenance staff, ground staff, office staff etc. Does it make sense to bring pilots back when the company is currently sufficiently staffed and meeting its obligations and pay them to sit reserve? Now they need to factor in cost of sending each person to the sim then most likely have them sit reserve. United has already said there’s no change to their current outlook until the end of Q1 2021. There is also no guarantee that consumer confidence or air travel will bounce back by March or April and this latest stimulus runs out March end so basically they can bring us back but if things don’t pick up we risk another furlough. Technically it’s cheaper to keep us pilots furloughed and bring back other people and start gearing up for the eventual return to demand by staffing other areas of operation gradually. I hope I’m wrong but we aren’t privy to a lot of internal details and workings of how this will fan out from an operational and business standpoint. Like I mentioned in one of my previous posts, we need a situation whereby the company has staffing issues for flying and HAS to bring us back. I was miserable about the furlough since September but I’ve accepted it and hope for the best while looking for other opportunities and riding the unemployment pony. |
Originally Posted by Imapylot
(Post 3174006)
Thanks for that long reply but it didn’t answer my question. They already said they are taking the money, so does that mean they have to bring back everyone that’s furloughed and pay them retroactively from December 1st?
It’s all about what the conditions/wording of the money stipulate. They can recall staff and it doesn’t necessarily mean furloughed pilots. |
Originally Posted by Imapylot
(Post 3174006)
Thanks for that long reply but it didn’t answer my question. They already said they are taking the money, so does that mean they have to bring back everyone that’s furloughed and pay them retroactively from December 1st?
|
Originally Posted by Hedley
(Post 3174009)
Kirby said that there has yet to be any indication that demand will be better than it currently is for a while. Rather than actually recall employees, wouldn’t it burn less cash for a company to just mail them a check for the next few months? It’s payroll support, not work protection.
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:55 AM. |
User Alert System provided by
Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Website Copyright ©2000 - 2017 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands