![]() |
Originally Posted by Just a Lurker
(Post 2595699)
Actually there are a handful of pilots here at VX who basically skipped a step or two and got hired super young who are now very senior. It’s not fair in a sense, but pilots don’t hire pilots, and it would be more unfair to punish everyone below them on the list. There will be individual winners and losers, there always are. .. I’m also curious why Moose thinks he could have been #1 at Virgin. Did he have 10,000 hours and a bunch of Airbus PIC time in 2006?
|
Originally Posted by Flynndawg
(Post 2595881)
Not trying to stir the pot but I am curious as to where the senior VX guys logged their previous Airbus hours? No doubt there are plenty of highly experienced pilots on the VX side due to airline casualties. I can empathize being a product of Braniff and Eastern parents.
|
Originally Posted by Flynndawg
(Post 2595881)
Not trying to stir the pot but I am curious as to where the senior VX guys logged their previous Airbus hours? No doubt there are plenty of highly experienced pilots on the VX side due to airline casualties. I can empathize being a product of Braniff and Eastern parents.
America West Jet Blue United Delta Northwest Just to name a few... |
Originally Posted by Moose
(Post 2595496)
No. These two airlines are apples and oranges due to age. I would be #1 at VA but by choice am 50% FO at Alaska. I like how Kelly did it SWA.
Btw, not by choice. |
I have been asked to refrain from engaging on this subject as it is highly controversial. This will be my last post on this subject. People are so emotional charged, no one thinks or acts logical. This is my first merger, it will not be my last. In the next merger the VX pilots will be represented by B&K. Alaska’s proposal will be adopted almost in its entirety, except for the backend feathering. Everyones longevity will be respected, including the VX pilots. Closing JFK is a tough pill to swallow, it will have the biggest impact on the VX pilot group, not the ISL. In base no one will be impacted by this merger, nothing will change. No captain will be reduced to a FO. Your bidding power will be unaffected. Scheduling, well that is a totally different subject and most likely will not be fixed until the next negotiations. I don’t think there is one Alaska pilot happy with our proposal, I doubt there are many VX pilots happy with the Alaska proposal. In the end, if this outcome sends you into fits of rage you need to move on. Everyone is hiring, there is a very real possibility you could find your new seniority number, at your new company, rendering you a significantly better career. Good luck to everyone, we will all be OK.
|
Originally Posted by Mea25000
(Post 2596065)
I have been asked to refrain from engaging on this subject as it is highly controversial. This will be my last post on this subject. People are so emotional charged, no one thinks or acts logical. This is my first merger, it will not be my last. In the next merger the VX pilots will be represented by B&K. Alaska’s proposal will be adopted almost in its entirety, except for the backend feathering. Everyones longevity will be respected, including the VX pilots. Closing JFK is a tough pill to swallow, it will have the biggest impact on the VX pilot group, not the ISL. In base no one will be impacted by this merger, nothing will change. No captain will be reduced to a FO. Your bidding power will be unaffected. Scheduling, well that is a totally different subject and most likely will not be fixed until the next negotiations. I don’t think there is one Alaska pilot happy with our proposal, I doubt there are many VX pilots happy with the Alaska proposal. In the end, if this outcome sends you into fits of rage you need to move on. Everyone is hiring, there is a very real possibility you could find your new seniority number, at your new company, rendering you a significantly better career. Good luck to everyone, we will all be OK.
|
Originally Posted by Flynndawg
(Post 2595881)
Not trying to stir the pot but I am curious as to where the senior VX guys logged their previous Airbus hours? No doubt there are plenty of highly experienced pilots on the VX side due to airline casualties. I can empathize being a product of Braniff and Eastern parents.
Independence Air Usa 3000 And a plethora of guys with foreign bus time. |
Originally Posted by Mea25000
(Post 2596065)
I have been asked to refrain from engaging on this subject as it is highly controversial. This will be my last post on this subject. People are so emotional charged, no one thinks or acts logical. This is my first merger, it will not be my last. In the next merger the VX pilots will be represented by B&K. Alaska’s proposal will be adopted almost in its entirety, except for the backend feathering. Everyones longevity will be respected, including the VX pilots. Closing JFK is a tough pill to swallow, it will have the biggest impact on the VX pilot group, not the ISL. In base no one will be impacted by this merger, nothing will change. No captain will be reduced to a FO. Your bidding power will be unaffected. Scheduling, well that is a totally different subject and most likely will not be fixed until the next negotiations. I don’t think there is one Alaska pilot happy with our proposal, I doubt there are many VX pilots happy with the Alaska proposal. In the end, if this outcome sends you into fits of rage you need to move on. Everyone is hiring, there is a very real possibility you could find your new seniority number, at your new company, rendering you a significantly better career. Good luck to everyone, we will all be OK.
|
Originally Posted by Jetlife
(Post 2596223)
Just so I understand, you are saying that the arbitrator will roll almost fully in favor of the Alaska proposal? Is that what you are saying?
|
Originally Posted by flywest
(Post 2596272)
That's what he's saying. I think the statement will most likely be the case for the most part.
Really? Ask Airways East how the arbitrator viewed their out of the earth proposal. |
Originally Posted by Mea25000
(Post 2596065)
I have been asked to refrain from engaging on this subject as it is highly controversial. This will be my last post on this subject. People are so emotional charged, no one thinks or acts logical. This is my first merger, it will not be my last. In the next merger the VX pilots will be represented by B&K. Alaska’s proposal will be adopted almost in its entirety, except for the backend feathering. Everyones longevity will be respected, including the VX pilots. Closing JFK is a tough pill to swallow, it will have the biggest impact on the VX pilot group, not the ISL. In base no one will be impacted by this merger, nothing will change. No captain will be reduced to a FO. Your bidding power will be unaffected. Scheduling, well that is a totally different subject and most likely will not be fixed until the next negotiations. I don’t think there is one Alaska pilot happy with our proposal, I doubt there are many VX pilots happy with the Alaska proposal. In the end, if this outcome sends you into fits of rage you need to move on. Everyone is hiring, there is a very real possibility you could find your new seniority number, at your new company, rendering you a significantly better career. Good luck to everyone, we will all be OK.
|
Originally Posted by Jetlife
(Post 2596223)
Just so I understand, you are saying that the arbitrator will roll almost fully in favor of the Alaska proposal? Is that what you are saying?
|
Originally Posted by MusicPilot
(Post 2596347)
Really? Ask Airways East how the arbitrator viewed their out of the earth proposal.
|
Robust contract?
Hahahaha that’s a good one. |
Robust manure pile is more accurate
|
Originally Posted by flywest
(Post 2596371)
How bought who in that case. In this case, what dose VX expect? 3 bites of the apple. Pay a robust contract, and skip to the top of Alaska's list. Who's over reaching? We shall see shortly.
Yes, we will see. |
Originally Posted by Max Thrust
(Post 2596382)
Robust manure pile is more accurate
|
The VX “contract” has no bearing on whether or not the AS contract is a robust pile of manure
|
Originally Posted by flywest
(Post 2596396)
So what was this non-binding rule book then? DAL contract 2.0 give me a break.
|
Originally Posted by Flaps1check
(Post 2596415)
JetBlue’s first contract is going to make our “legacy” contract look like a joke. But, what can we expect? It’s alaska we are dealing with, ah it’s okay I drive to work, I go where they tell me to go, it’s the arbitrators fault, I’m happy with what they give me, it’s pointless we’ll lose anyways. Ignorance, defeatist attitude and apathy are the reasons we have what we have. It’s time to pull our collective heads out of our a**** and focus on 2020. Stop the SLI bickering, nothing you say here changes anything.
Ok I need help. I am failing to see your exuberance with the B6 contract. They will make .47 cents more an hour then me. By this time next year I will be making $2 and a half dollars more then them, on an arbitrated award. From that point they will trail the behind SWA, the #4 contract, at a rate of 3% a year. In 2020 rates at SWA 283 to 269 at B6. Medical still garbage, 5hr day Ok, long term med garbage, scope ok but honestly I think scope is a waste of time, my opinion only. Still well done B6 but you fade fast during robust times. What is there to crow about though. You don’t think the big 3 and SWA are coming in well above this really really soon? Or do you just like to dog Alaska? |
Originally Posted by OTZeagle1
(Post 2596435)
scope ok but honestly I think scope is a waste of time, my opinion only.
|
Originally Posted by OTZeagle1
(Post 2596435)
Ok I need help. I am failing to see your exuberance with the B6 contract. They will make .47 cents more an hour then me. By this time next year I will be making $2 and a half dollars more then them, on an arbitrated award. From that point they will trail the behind SWA, the #4 contract, at a rate of 3% a year. In 2020 rates at SWA 283 to 269 at B6. Medical still garbage, 5hr day Ok, long term med garbage, scope ok but honestly I think scope is a waste of time, my opinion only. Still well done B6 but you fade fast during robust times. What is there to crow about though. You don’t think the big 3 and SWA are coming in well above this really really soon?
Or do you just like to dog Alaska? |
Originally Posted by PokerPilot007
(Post 2596375)
Well done JetBlue! After 15 years in business, and with your first contract, you were able to get more than Alaska has in 85 years! 🤦*♂️
Originally Posted by cmrflyer
(Post 2596409)
Well done JetBlue. First contract. Scope, pay, health care, scheduling etc etc all the things no one can get in their first contract.
Amazing. |
Originally Posted by Ray Red
(Post 2596358)
But he also says that your bidding power will be unaffected which, if true, can only mean relative. MEA is saying two different t things that are diametrically opposed to each other.
Your overall System Seniority will change but in practical terms your Base/Aircraft Seniority will remain unchanged. At least for a few months (years?).... That's how I read it.... |
Originally Posted by OTZeagle1
(Post 2596435)
Ok I need help. I am failing to see your exuberance with the B6 contract. They will make .47 cents more an hour then me. By this time next year I will be making $2 and a half dollars more then them, on an arbitrated award. From that point they will trail the behind SWA, the #4 contract, at a rate of 3% a year. In 2020 rates at SWA 283 to 269 at B6. Medical still garbage, 5hr day Ok, long term med garbage, scope ok but honestly I think scope is a waste of time, my opinion only. Still well done B6 but you fade fast during robust times. What is there to crow about though. You don’t think the big 3 and SWA are coming in well above this really really soon?
Or do you just like to dog Alaska? Truth of the matter, you don't want a good contract. You don't see value in it. Scope? You're at the top of the list, it's worthless. Good work rules? Can't see that on a spreadsheet - worthless. You want a subpar contract so you can keep getting invites to Brad's summer cookouts. Thanks for making it abundantly clear to us. |
Looks like 737 drivers get to enjoy the transcon redeyes and HI for 13/hour less than JB pilots. Congrats JB! Nice first contract.
|
Any idea when the arbitrators will Rule on a final seniority list?
|
Originally Posted by svergin
(Post 2598415)
Any idea when the arbitrators will Rule on a final seniority list?
|
Can someone post each group’s proposal to the arbitrator?
Is longevity given a higher weighting in the combined list? |
It’s going to be a disaster no matter what the outcome is. One big fat ****ed off pilot group.
|
Originally Posted by OCCP
(Post 2599089)
It’s going to be a disaster no matter what the outcome is. One big fat ****ed off pilot group.
|
all the angst and bitterness that is building around this is crazy. I could see it if this airline was a quality career but it isnt and it never was. It is like fighting over which Denny’s you are going to work at. It is just a job. It doesn’t matter whether you are number 1 at Dennys or number 2000 it is still Dennys. Crazy misplaced ego you all have
|
Originally Posted by Ch1956ris
(Post 2599037)
Can someone post each group’s proposal to the arbitrator?
Is longevity given a higher weighting in the combined list? The proposals are very long and would be impossible to post here. But to give you the gist of them... Alaska says that VX pilots received a huge windfall by getting to become Alaska pilots and adopting their contrat. That they have massive advantage in longevity and that should be primary. Except for their first officers which should get special feathering above VX first officers despite lower longevity. Virgin side says that although weight should be allowed for longevity a more consistent hybrid model should be used set of past precedents. That carry through the whole list. Both sides put in captain seat protections. The proposals create a pretty diverse results depending on where you are on the list. There is no point in predicting because depending on the decision you could see a very different outcome. Everyone is going to be irritated about the final list. So honestly this discussion is pointless. |
Originally Posted by airb320
(Post 2599199)
TRUE... but guess what, get over it...
It’s hard to get over a stalled career. |
Originally Posted by OCCP
(Post 2599518)
It’s hard to get over a stalled career.
Are you A. going to be miserable or B. get over it, move on, apply elsewhere if need be... it’s a choice Think about it, the only one that will be truly “happy” is the #1 Pilot on the combined list, everyone else will probably loose out at varying degrees😉 |
Originally Posted by OCCP
(Post 2599518)
It’s hard to get over a stalled career.
|
If Alaska doesn’t put a rudder on this ship we’ll probably all get furloughed
|
Originally Posted by airb320
(Post 2599637)
I agree with you yet again... do something about it! You can’t change the Arbitrators ruling but you can control how you will feel/behave.
Are you A. going to be miserable or B. get over it, move on, apply elsewhere if need be... it’s a choice Think about it, the only one that will be truly “happy” is the #1 Pilot on the combined list, everyone else will probably loose out at varying degrees😉 For me...I'll get over it and move on and deal with it as it comes. Happiness is a choice. Dealing with negative things in life is a constant struggle everyone goes through..some deal with it better than others. |
Originally Posted by 4andCounting
(Post 2599504)
Longevity is not given more weight per say via the ALPA merger policy. It is one of the the three items required to be considered in designing an SLI. In the past several mergers longevity has been used with different weights. Most of them have used around a 15% weight. Which was the VX side proposal. The AS side proposed a 70% weight I believe.
Alaska says that VX pilots received a huge windfall by getting to become Alaska pilots and adopting their contract. That they have massive advantage in longevity and that should be primary. Except for their first officers which should get special feathering above VX first officers despite lower longevity. Even with longevity weighted at 35% I was placed with a United pilot hired 7+ years before me. Zero United pilots who were placed senior to me are younger than me. I hate to tell you, but if you’re banking on longevity to be heavily weighted, its not going to be. I’d be shocked to see anyone move more than 5-10% anywhere on your list. |
Originally Posted by svergin
(Post 2599850)
UAL said the same thing in our merger and didn’t get it. “Superior airline” isn’t part of merger policy either. Everyone stayed within 5% of their same seniority percentage despite United having almost 4 times the number of widebody airplanes.
Even with longevity weighted at 35% I was placed with a United pilot hired 7+ years before me. Zero United pilots who were placed senior to me are younger than me. I hate to tell you, but if you’re banking on longevity to be heavily weighted, its not going to be. I’d be shocked to see anyone move more than 5-10% anywhere on your list. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:32 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands