![]() |
Originally Posted by symbian simian
(Post 2582654)
That doesn’t answer the question about the supposed windfall for the top VA guys. They were bidding top 1% and won’t be after integration. Not saying 20 year AAG pilots deserve having people put above them, but if their relative seniority does not decrease they won’t lose ground, because their bidding power remains the same.
I don’t think any AAG loses relative seniority, or any VA pilot will gain relative seniority in the VA proposal, but I will happily be corrected by anyone who knows better. I believe the VX proposal has most losing relative seniority and gaining in longevity. Then there’s some VX pilots who lose both. |
Originally Posted by MusicPilot
(Post 2582641)
Not quite sure what list you’re looking at.
|
Originally Posted by MusicPilot
(Post 2582674)
I believe the VX proposal has most losing relative seniority and gaining in longevity. Then there’s some VX pilots who lose both.
Gaining longevity??? The company is going to grant years of service to VX pilots in accordance with where they land on the final approved list? Longevity is only good for vacation accrual and nonrev priority anyway. |
Originally Posted by rickair7777
(Post 2582685)
Gaining longevity??? The company is going to grant years of service to VX pilots in accordance with where they land on the final approved list?
Longevity is only good for vacation accrual and nonrev priority anyway. And any VX guys will never have ANY change to their longevity regardless of where they are placed on the list. They will always be at a disadvantage to their longer tenured AS cohorts. Lets look at what each proposal does to the junior CA at VX. In the VX proposal 20 CA from the snapshot are pushed below the CA stovepipe line which then places 20 AS FO's into their position. In the AS proposal the number of VX CA's pushed below the CA stovepipe line as of snapshot is increased to 137 with the same number of AS FO's then residing above the stovepipe line. Obviously the VX side is much more exposed to harm with the possibility of base closure, vacancy bids, and probable reduction in the Airbus fleet, if not a complete elimination of the Airbus. Not to mention operating with a management group who has the ultimate latitude with ZERO scope protections. |
You all need to find some hobbies other than internet. Like finding out this sweet screen name was still available.
|
Originally Posted by Ala5ka
(Post 2582736)
You all need to find some hobbies other than internet. Like finding out this sweet screen name was still available.
Well done sir! |
Originally Posted by MusicPilot
(Post 2582641)
Not quite sure what list you’re looking at.
|
Originally Posted by Ala5ka
(Post 2582736)
You all need to find some hobbies other than internet. Like finding out this sweet screen name was still available.
|
Thank you thank you, I couldn't have done it without the continuing frustrations brought on by our dear leaders!!!! Thank you and goodnight!
Originally Posted by Chuckie
(Post 2582870)
First post win! :D:D:D Admins, you can close this thread now.
|
Originally Posted by Ala5ka
(Post 2582736)
You all need to find some hobbies other than internet. Like finding out this sweet screen name was still available.
|
Originally Posted by AtlCSIP
(Post 2582845)
The final award published in the Alaska Pilots company website. 2/2014 for Boeing.
You’re looking at a future estimated list. I’m going off of the last updated seniority list. You also have to remember that prior to the snapshot date VX was the one growing. There was more to gain at VX. Then AS management accelerated that growth and then slammed on the brakes. Now they’ll have to slam it on again as we don’t have the proper staffing for line bidding. Either way, management is loving that our unity is slowly breaking apart. Just wait until they open the bases and planes etc. |
Originally Posted by MusicPilot
(Post 2583001)
You’re looking at a future estimated list. I’m going off of the last updated seniority list. You also have to remember that prior to the snapshot date VX was the one growing. There was more to gain at VX. Then AS management accelerated that growth and then slammed on the brakes. Now they’ll have to slam it on again as we don’t have the proper staffing for line bidding.
Either way, management is loving that our unity is slowly breaking apart. Just wait until they open the bases and planes etc. |
Originally Posted by symbian simian
(Post 2582654)
because their bidding power remains the same.
|
Originally Posted by MusicPilot
(Post 2582674)
I believe the VX proposal has most losing relative seniority and gaining in longevity. Then there’s some VX pilots who lose both.
VX proposal has this pilot moving from 0% on the list to 4% down after sli. The AS pilot directly below is also at 4% after, but previously held a spot 7% down the AS snapshot list. AS proposal has #1 VX pilot moving to 22% down after sli. The AS pilot directly below is also now 22% after previously holding a spot 38% down the AS snapshot list. *using 2850 as post sli denominator |
Originally Posted by Packrat
(Post 2583197)
That may be valid in a PBS system, but AS doesn't have that. In a line bidding based system, EVERY number senior to you has a dramatic effect on your "bidding power." It can certainly mean the difference between a 20 day off line bidding mid-continent turns and double BOS layovers that require a commute the day before, a hotel in between and a commute at the end with 12 days off.
|
|
Originally Posted by MusicPilot
(Post 2582674)
I believe the VX proposal has most losing relative seniority and gaining in longevity. Then there’s some VX pilots who lose both.
|
Originally Posted by PokerPilot007
(Post 2583978)
I lose 10% on the list and lose 33% of my longevity. Please tell me how I'm hitting the lottery?? I would have been better off with DOH!
I’m referring to the VX side. |
Originally Posted by PokerPilot007
(Post 2583978)
I lose 10% on the list and lose 33% of my longevity. Please tell me how I'm hitting the lottery?? I would have been better off with DOH!
|
Originally Posted by PokerPilot007
(Post 2583978)
I lose 10% on the list and lose 33% of my longevity. Please tell me how I'm hitting the lottery?? I would have been better off with DOH!
Originally Posted by Ray Red
(Post 2584012)
How on earth can a SLI produce a decrease in longevity for anyone?
|
Originally Posted by MusicPilot
(Post 2584007)
I’m referring to the VX side.
|
Originally Posted by 2loud
(Post 2584031)
Better to lose 10% than being on a street corner. Best case, y'all would have been in the mix with dysfunctional B6. You think eskimo is dysfunctional, spend some time over there. Y'all won the jackpot so quit your whining. I'd go with DOH but a Swingline is more suitable.
Some pilots are sharp as a bowling ball, that's why. |
Why was VX for sale?
|
Originally Posted by Caveman
(Post 2584317)
Why was VX for sale?
|
Originally Posted by Caveman
(Post 2584317)
Why was VX for sale?
|
Delta wanted to sell y'all as scrap metal but DOJ wouldn't approve so Eskimo outbid blewho.
Robust and thriving businesses just don't wake up one morning and sell just because a potential buyer makes an offer. It's usually because of their inability to compete in the market and/or just weak. I'm just sayin'. |
Originally Posted by 2loud
(Post 2584458)
Delta wanted to sell y'all as scrap metal but DOJ wouldn't approve so Eskimo outbid blewho.
Robust and thriving businesses just don't wake up one morning and sell just because a potential buyer makes an offer. It's usually because of their inability to compete in the market and/or just weak. I'm just sayin'. A publicly traded company with a CEO and BOD has a fiduciary duty to their shareholders. If a buyout offer is presented at a significant premium to the current share price, it has to be considered. |
Originally Posted by 2loud
(Post 2584458)
Delta wanted to sell y'all as scrap metal but DOJ wouldn't approve so Eskimo outbid blewho.
Robust and thriving businesses just don't wake up one morning and sell just because a potential buyer makes an offer. It's usually because of their inability to compete in the market and/or just weak. I'm just sayin'. |
Originally Posted by AJ Crowley
(Post 2584337)
Every public company is for sale. When a offer comes in the board of directors has to consider that offer. 3 airlines approached Virgin. Virgin did not put itself out for sale.
|
Why does anyone bother engage these idiots? It’s obvious they haven’t read S-10s, SEC filings, the acquisition documents, the SLI transcripts, etc, etc. They’re just making crap up, or regurgitating rumors and nonsense they hear in cockpits as fact. For example, Iif you read the documents, Alaska approached VX first. Once VX’s board decided to sell, they went out and whipped up competition eventually gaining four more parties that drove the price up. They were hedge fund managers after all and knew the game.
The basic problem with some posters on here is that they are angry they aren’t guaranteed a windfall from AS acquiring VX. We are all just pilots flying from A to B and back. Whether your company makes a lot of money, acquires someone, merges, gets acquired, or fails, or gains routes and makes more money because someone else fails, it’s got NOTHING to do with you. Alaska did well for a long time. So what, it’s got nothing to do with how well the pilots flew. You didn't outfly the boys at Pan Am, TWA, etc. Alaska acquired VX, guess what, once again it had nothing to do with how well you flew. AND, get this, just because MANAGEMENT acquires someone doesn’t mean PILOTS get any benefits. A lot of guys on here seem to think there was something in this merger for them. Nope, your just a pilot. No different than a pilot whose company failed. Or who got acquired. ANY corporate level business decision could be good or bad for pilots. We are all just in it for the ride. That’s how a career as labor works. You want to make personal gains through corporate acquisitions, you’d best join management. |
Originally Posted by PokerPilot007
(Post 2583978)
I lose 10% on the list and lose 33% of my longevity. Please tell me how I'm hitting the lottery?? I would have been better off with DOH!
Also AAG overpayed for something they didn’t even want and now everyone is butthurt. |
Originally Posted by Just a Lurker
(Post 2584622)
Why does anyone bother engage these idiots? It’s obvious they haven’t read S-10s, SEC filings, the acquisition documents, the SLI transcripts, etc, etc. They’re just making crap up, or regurgitating rumors and nonsense they hear in cockpits as fact. For example, Iif you read the documents, Alaska approached VX first. Once VX’s board decided to sell, they went out and whipped up competition eventually gaining four more parties that drove the price up. They were hedge fund managers after all and knew the game.
The basic problem with some posters on here is that they are angry they aren’t guaranteed a windfall from AS acquiring VX. We are all just pilots flying from A to B and back. Whether your company makes a lot of money, acquires someone, merges, gets acquired, or fails, or gains routes and makes more money because someone else fails, it’s got NOTHING to do with you. Alaska did well for a long time. So what, it’s got nothing to do with how well the pilots flew. You didn't outfly the boys at Pan Am, TWA, etc. Alaska acquired VX, guess what, once again it had nothing to do with how well you flew. AND, get this, just because MANAGEMENT acquires someone doesn’t mean PILOTS get any benefits. A lot of guys on here seem to think there was something in this merger for them. Nope, your just a pilot. No different than a pilot whose company failed. Or who got acquired. ANY corporate level business decision could be good or bad for pilots. We are all just in it for the ride. That’s how a career as labor works. You want to make personal gains through corporate acquisitions, you’d best join management. |
Originally Posted by rickair7777
(Post 2584640)
A lot of folks here would be wise to read and heed these words.
You probably need tweezers to make use of a urinal if things like built vs bought or hired vs acquired even crosses your mind let alone passes your lips. |
Originally Posted by Just a Lurker
(Post 2584622)
Why does anyone bother engage these idiots? It’s obvious they haven’t read S-10s, SEC filings, the acquisition documents, the SLI transcripts, etc, etc. They’re just making crap up, or regurgitating rumors and nonsense they hear in cockpits as fact. For example, Iif you read the documents, Alaska approached VX first. Once VX’s board decided to sell, they went out and whipped up competition eventually gaining four more parties that drove the price up.
Let's see how long this takes 3.. 2.. 1.. (Little bit of psychology here.. Lol) |
Originally Posted by FNGFO
(Post 2584657)
Yes, but it’s much easier to walk around thinking you’re a sky god, thumping your chest proclaiming that you’re an OG (original goober) and pretending like the pilots of the acquired company spent their days praying to be hired by your company while knowing they’d never be good enough.
You probably need tweezers to make use of a urinal if things like built vs bought or hired vs acquired even crosses your mind let alone passes your lips. I guess if VX guys made up bag tags that said "DRAFTED NOT SHAFTED!", some of our AS brothers would just totally lose it!! I kid, I kid : )) |
Originally Posted by All Bizniz
(Post 2584664)
Now that's some funny sh** right there!! Lol
I guess if VX guys made up bag tags that said "DRAFTED NOT SHAFTED!", some of our AS brothers would just totally lose it!! I kid, I kid : )) |
Originally Posted by 2loud
(Post 2584946)
“Tagged and bagged by the sagged”
|
Proud to be a OG! Can't wait to to bid the bus out of SEA and do the north south flying the VX people hate. It's the best! Now if they would only bring back my MD80.
|
Heck the bus might become the new MD80. North south bird. I'm just not going back to a round dial Boeing flying SE. Did my time. OG's Rock!
|
Originally Posted by All Bizniz
(Post 2585238)
Took you 6 hours to come up with that, huh? Lol
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:27 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands