![]() |
Originally Posted by AtlCSIP
(Post 2582845)
The final award published in the Alaska Pilots company website. 2/2014 for Boeing.
You’re looking at a future estimated list. I’m going off of the last updated seniority list. You also have to remember that prior to the snapshot date VX was the one growing. There was more to gain at VX. Then AS management accelerated that growth and then slammed on the brakes. Now they’ll have to slam it on again as we don’t have the proper staffing for line bidding. Either way, management is loving that our unity is slowly breaking apart. Just wait until they open the bases and planes etc. |
Originally Posted by MusicPilot
(Post 2583001)
You’re looking at a future estimated list. I’m going off of the last updated seniority list. You also have to remember that prior to the snapshot date VX was the one growing. There was more to gain at VX. Then AS management accelerated that growth and then slammed on the brakes. Now they’ll have to slam it on again as we don’t have the proper staffing for line bidding.
Either way, management is loving that our unity is slowly breaking apart. Just wait until they open the bases and planes etc. |
Originally Posted by symbian simian
(Post 2582654)
because their bidding power remains the same.
|
Originally Posted by MusicPilot
(Post 2582674)
I believe the VX proposal has most losing relative seniority and gaining in longevity. Then there’s some VX pilots who lose both.
VX proposal has this pilot moving from 0% on the list to 4% down after sli. The AS pilot directly below is also at 4% after, but previously held a spot 7% down the AS snapshot list. AS proposal has #1 VX pilot moving to 22% down after sli. The AS pilot directly below is also now 22% after previously holding a spot 38% down the AS snapshot list. *using 2850 as post sli denominator |
Originally Posted by Packrat
(Post 2583197)
That may be valid in a PBS system, but AS doesn't have that. In a line bidding based system, EVERY number senior to you has a dramatic effect on your "bidding power." It can certainly mean the difference between a 20 day off line bidding mid-continent turns and double BOS layovers that require a commute the day before, a hotel in between and a commute at the end with 12 days off.
|
|
Originally Posted by MusicPilot
(Post 2582674)
I believe the VX proposal has most losing relative seniority and gaining in longevity. Then there’s some VX pilots who lose both.
|
Originally Posted by PokerPilot007
(Post 2583978)
I lose 10% on the list and lose 33% of my longevity. Please tell me how I'm hitting the lottery?? I would have been better off with DOH!
I’m referring to the VX side. |
Originally Posted by PokerPilot007
(Post 2583978)
I lose 10% on the list and lose 33% of my longevity. Please tell me how I'm hitting the lottery?? I would have been better off with DOH!
|
Originally Posted by PokerPilot007
(Post 2583978)
I lose 10% on the list and lose 33% of my longevity. Please tell me how I'm hitting the lottery?? I would have been better off with DOH!
Originally Posted by Ray Red
(Post 2584012)
How on earth can a SLI produce a decrease in longevity for anyone?
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:16 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands