Yikes Part 2
#121
Number Last
Joined: Sep 2017
Posts: 442
Likes: 0
From: Boeing voice activated systems and ACARS commander
#123
Thou assumeth much grasshoppa. It appears it was you who missed the numbers. And the facts. Considering your audience perhaps a little research would help your credibility.
Beyond the fact that not all AF pilots are zoomies and their USAFA time is not included in their years of service, many serve their time in the reserves while accruing seniority at major airlines. This puts your assumed timeline--and presumed age--off by what could amount to decades.
Beyond the fact that not all AF pilots are zoomies and their USAFA time is not included in their years of service, many serve their time in the reserves while accruing seniority at major airlines. This puts your assumed timeline--and presumed age--off by what could amount to decades.
#124
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 224
Likes: 0
From: Cirrus CA
I just heard from a captain on the crew bus that he was fired for drinking against company policy, and she retained her job. This despite them BOTH drinking in the window.
Rape or no rape, they both drank against company policy. Why isn’t she being fired for her offense (especially due to her probationary status), just as he was/is?
If I were him, I’d sue AAG for sexism and equal opportunity practices.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Rape or no rape, they both drank against company policy. Why isn’t she being fired for her offense (especially due to her probationary status), just as he was/is?
If I were him, I’d sue AAG for sexism and equal opportunity practices.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
#125
Nobody wants to take a case to court for wrongful termination when the immediate supervisor was the one that provoked the situation that caused the termination. The supervisor getting canned and the subordinate getting counseled and her probation extended is about par for the course.
Combine that with the rape allegation and the woman's civil suit against Alaska and that would make the legal department even LESS likely to recommend canning the junior person, because it would reek of retribution for the lawsuit itself, a lawsuit that Alaska dearly wants to settle out of court to avoid going through discovery and even more desperately wants to avoid the adverse publicity a trial would cost them.
Basically, they need the goodwill of the young woman whereas the captain has made himself a liability and an embarrassment. This was predictable from day one.
#126
I just heard from a captain on the crew bus that he was fired for drinking against company policy, and she retained her job. This despite them BOTH drinking in the window.
Rape or no rape, they both drank against company policy. Why isn’t she being fired for her offense (especially due to her probationary status), just as he was/is?
If I were him, I’d sue AAG for sexism and equal opportunity practices.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Rape or no rape, they both drank against company policy. Why isn’t she being fired for her offense (especially due to her probationary status), just as he was/is?
If I were him, I’d sue AAG for sexism and equal opportunity practices.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
#127
Banned
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,473
Likes: 0
Perhaps DUE to her probationary status and the fact that her immediate supervisor was pouring the drinks for her.
Nobody wants to take a case to court for wrongful termination when the immediate supervisor was the one that provoked the situation that caused the termination. The supervisor getting canned and the subordinate getting counseled and her probation extended is about par for the course.
Combine that with the rape allegation and the woman's civil suit against Alaska and that would make the legal department even LESS likely to recommend canning the junior person, because it would reek of retribution for the lawsuit itself, a lawsuit that Alaska dearly wants to settle out of court to avoid going through discovery and even more desperately wants to avoid the adverse publicity a trial would cost them.
Basically, they need the goodwill of the young woman whereas the captain has made himself a liability and an embarrassment. This was predictable from day one.
Nobody wants to take a case to court for wrongful termination when the immediate supervisor was the one that provoked the situation that caused the termination. The supervisor getting canned and the subordinate getting counseled and her probation extended is about par for the course.
Combine that with the rape allegation and the woman's civil suit against Alaska and that would make the legal department even LESS likely to recommend canning the junior person, because it would reek of retribution for the lawsuit itself, a lawsuit that Alaska dearly wants to settle out of court to avoid going through discovery and even more desperately wants to avoid the adverse publicity a trial would cost them.
Basically, they need the goodwill of the young woman whereas the captain has made himself a liability and an embarrassment. This was predictable from day one.
#128
Swimmin' in da pool
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 449
Likes: 0
Perhaps DUE to her probationary status and the fact that her immediate supervisor was pouring the drinks for her.
Nobody wants to take a case to court for wrongful termination when the immediate supervisor was the one that provoked the situation that caused the termination. The supervisor getting canned and the subordinate getting counseled and her probation extended is about par for the course.
Combine that with the rape allegation and the woman's civil suit against Alaska and that would make the legal department even LESS likely to recommend canning the junior person, because it would reek of retribution for the lawsuit itself, a lawsuit that Alaska dearly wants to settle out of court to avoid going through discovery and even more desperately wants to avoid the adverse publicity a trial would cost them.
Basically, they need the goodwill of the young woman whereas the captain has made himself a liability and an embarrassment. This was predictable from day one.
Nobody wants to take a case to court for wrongful termination when the immediate supervisor was the one that provoked the situation that caused the termination. The supervisor getting canned and the subordinate getting counseled and her probation extended is about par for the course.
Combine that with the rape allegation and the woman's civil suit against Alaska and that would make the legal department even LESS likely to recommend canning the junior person, because it would reek of retribution for the lawsuit itself, a lawsuit that Alaska dearly wants to settle out of court to avoid going through discovery and even more desperately wants to avoid the adverse publicity a trial would cost them.
Basically, they need the goodwill of the young woman whereas the captain has made himself a liability and an embarrassment. This was predictable from day one.
Given today's corporate culture and fear of further liability, lawsuits, and more bad press, would it be safe to guess that this captain was offered a settlement that involved a severance package and the ability to resign in lieu of termination? I can only imagine the number of attorneys who would otherwise be contacting this captain for a wrongful termination lawsuit. Alaska just wants this whole mess to quietly go away and, given the sizeable legal costs and PR disaster of another lawsuit dragging out indefinitely, likely cut their losses, made an offer big enough to entice him to 'retire'. She's satisfied by his dismissal and the media and lawyers go away. Problem solved.
Last edited by dawgdriver; 05-07-2018 at 10:35 AM.
#129
Alaska just wants this whole mess to quietly go away and, given the sizeable legal costs and PR disaster of another lawsuit dragging out indefinitely, likely cut their losses, made an offer big enough to entice him to 'retire'. She's satisfied by his dismissal and the media and lawyers go away. Problem solved.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



