Additional Max Order Rumored
10-12-2020, 05:16 PM
#21
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: May 2018
Posts: 1,171
They are looking at 7’s... I would put it at unlikely. I think it makes a lot of sense but I also think SFO should remain open as a Boeing base. Hopefully, the order comes out with 7,8,9, and 10’s. I hear it’s 40 firm new, plus the old 37 order, plus 88 options 😂. Good news, we are hoping to take every option. Numbers right now I heard are 37 8’s, 40 9’s. All the options are 9’s, convertible to 10’s.
Last edited by OTZeagle1; 10-12-2020 at 05:32 PM.
10-12-2020, 05:50 PM
#22
On Reserve
Joined APC: Sep 2018
Posts: 14
I’m one of the the cross bidders, Boeing to Bus. Held out on the first few bids as SD and others were saying 737 Bay Area base soon....well That didn’t happen. I’m assuming it was a co-term issue but fingers are crossed we can keep SFO as a 737 base.
10-12-2020, 06:41 PM
#23
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2019
Posts: 144
Originally Posted by Humbucker
I’m one of the the cross bidders, Boeing to Bus. Held out on the first few bids as SD and others were saying 737 Bay Area base soon....well That didn’t happen. I’m assuming it was a co-term issue but fingers are crossed we can keep SFO as a 737 base.
10-13-2020, 12:46 AM
#24
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Posts: 8,898
They gave writing on the wall for the SFO base. The only saving grace could be a co-domicile potential, where pilots cover all three SFO, OAK, and SJC. If that doesn’t happen there’s just too many different fleets going into those 3 airports.
10-14-2020, 12:16 AM
#25
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2019
Posts: 791
Originally Posted by ShyGuy
They gave writing on the wall for the SFO base. The only saving grace could be a co-domicile potential, where pilots cover all three SFO, OAK, and SJC. If that doesn’t happen there’s just too many different fleets going into those 3 airports.
10-16-2020, 02:16 PM
#26
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: May 2018
Posts: 1,171
No concessions! I am not interested in subsidizing a MAX order and management stock options. Order planes or don’t order planes, I am not interested in subsidizing growth that may or may not happen. Just remember every MAX they take could result in a return of a NG. If they think they have to furlough to survive, furlough. Our company is solid, we will weather this storm, management has stolen enough from our careers!
10-17-2020, 12:42 PM
#30
Line Holder
Joined APC: Apr 2016
Posts: 68
Originally Posted by OTZeagle1
No concessions! I am not interested in subsidizing a MAX order and management stock options. Order planes or don’t order planes, I am not interested in subsidizing growth that may or may not happen. Just remember every MAX they take could result in a return of a NG. If they think they have to furlough to survive, furlough. Our company is solid, we will weather this storm, management has stolen enough from our careers!
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
