Additional Max Order Rumored
10-12-2020 | 05:16 PM
#21
Banned
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 1,241
Likes: 0
They are looking at 7’s... I would put it at unlikely. I think it makes a lot of sense but I also think SFO should remain open as a Boeing base. Hopefully, the order comes out with 7,8,9, and 10’s. I hear it’s 40 firm new, plus the old 37 order, plus 88 options 😂. Good news, we are hoping to take every option. Numbers right now I heard are 37 8’s, 40 9’s. All the options are 9’s, convertible to 10’s.
Last edited by OTZeagle1; 10-12-2020 at 05:32 PM.
10-12-2020 | 05:50 PM
#22
On Reserve
Joined: Sep 2018
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
I’m one of the the cross bidders, Boeing to Bus. Held out on the first few bids as SD and others were saying 737 Bay Area base soon....well That didn’t happen. I’m assuming it was a co-term issue but fingers are crossed we can keep SFO as a 737 base.
10-12-2020 | 06:41 PM
#23
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2019
Posts: 145
Likes: 0
If Alaska does their usual, turn tail and run, routine then Southwest is going to chase us out of the Bay Area to Hawaii markets and that will probably be the end of a long term SFO base. Let’s see if we try to put up a fight in Oakland.
10-13-2020 | 12:46 AM
#24
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 9,349
Likes: 331
They gave writing on the wall for the SFO base. The only saving grace could be a co-domicile potential, where pilots cover all three SFO, OAK, and SJC. If that doesn’t happen there’s just too many different fleets going into those 3 airports.
10-14-2020 | 12:16 AM
#25
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Nov 2019
Posts: 791
Likes: 0
There was already a negotiation that failed surrounding a Co-Terminal agreement for the bay area. Our position was to tighten up Co-Terminal language and their’s was to gut it as if it was a gift. So there is that.
10-16-2020 | 02:16 PM
#26
Banned
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 1,241
Likes: 0
No concessions! I am not interested in subsidizing a MAX order and management stock options. Order planes or don’t order planes, I am not interested in subsidizing growth that may or may not happen. Just remember every MAX they take could result in a return of a NG. If they think they have to furlough to survive, furlough. Our company is solid, we will weather this storm, management has stolen enough from our careers!
10-17-2020 | 12:42 PM
#30
Line Holder
Joined: Apr 2016
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
No concessions! I am not interested in subsidizing a MAX order and management stock options. Order planes or don’t order planes, I am not interested in subsidizing growth that may or may not happen. Just remember every MAX they take could result in a return of a NG. If they think they have to furlough to survive, furlough. Our company is solid, we will weather this storm, management has stolen enough from our careers!
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
