![]() |
Originally Posted by PNWFlyer
(Post 3322674)
what will makes us lose direction is making posts like this and forgetting about 2009. Did it slip your mind? You know, the contact where pilots on property kept their pension. No room for scope improvements in that contract?
|
Originally Posted by PNWFlyer
(Post 3321901)
well Alaska is different from the other airlines you mentioned.. Alaska is still here. To get a better contact you have to be willing to burn the house down. The older pilots with their pensions were not willing to do that. So, we have the contract they gave us.
They are now the minority and changes are coming. We will fight as hard now as they should have fought then. But they had other objectives. |
Originally Posted by 9mikemike
(Post 3322836)
I think you meant to say “Contract 2009 where pilots got to choose what type of retirement they wanted and only some chose to keep their pension”. Poor comparison.
|
Originally Posted by PNWFlyer
(Post 3322894)
and once again, where were the scope improvements? How is that a poor comparison?
|
Originally Posted by 9mikemike
(Post 3323284)
Hook line and sinker we took it and were played the fools once again.
There's almost a regional airline-like mentality- where the senior Seattle lifers set the tone because the rest are moving on in a couple of years anyway. It needs to change. Alaska is a growing airline that has ambitions to compete nationally against large competitors. Its pilots should have a contract that reflects those goals. Have some self-respect and negotiate for it. |
Originally Posted by flyprdu
(Post 3323291)
This is proof enough that the old union playbook needs to be thrown away. Having the old "get along to go along" philosophy has left this pilot group a day late and a dollar short for decades.
There's almost a regional airline-like mentality- where the senior Seattle lifers set the tone because the rest are moving on in a couple of years anyway. It needs to change. Alaska is a growing airline that has ambitions to compete nationally against large competitors. Its pilots should have a contract that reflects those goals. Have some self-respect and negotiate for it. |
Originally Posted by flysnoopy76
(Post 3323295)
Alaska has no intention of competing nationally with anyone.
Even if it's totally BS, they have made the claims they want to be a player in the US. If that's the case, then the pilots need a commensurate contract to go with those aspirations. I've never met a pilot group with such an inferiority complex in my entire career. |
Originally Posted by flyprdu
(Post 3323297)
This is that whole self-respect thing I just talked about. If BM really wants 4600 pilots, they're going to have to fly somewhere outside of the PNW and AK.
Even if it's totally BS, they have made the claims they want to be a player in the US. If that's the case, then the pilots need a commensurate contract to go with those aspirations. I've never met a pilot group with such an inferiority complex in my entire career. Im not sure where the 4600 number comes from, perhaps that number includes Horizon and Skywest pilots flying for Air Group. There will not be 4600 mainline pilots anytime soon. |
I heard 3600-3800ish the target for the end of 2026…. I like 4600 a lot better though, maybe that is a merger number.
|
Originally Posted by OTZeagle1
(Post 3324138)
I heard 3600-3800ish the target for the end of 2026…. I like 4600 a lot better though, maybe that is a merger number.
thats gonna be a lot of airbuses to park |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:09 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands