That's not the company's fault...

https://www.mojosavings.com/wp-conte...outhwash-1.jpg

Just a random observation, even if we had won the Scope ask as part of the 3 improvements from contract update 2017 this would have still happened. What was proposed then were weight and seat caps. There were no limits proposed for regional vs mainline scope in terms of aircraft ratios, block hours, or capping of total regional aircraft.

True however, it was meant to get “our foot in the door” and we could have build on that this time around. Limits need to include no additional Regional flying as long as Mainline Pilots are on furlough or in this case on EIL’s… Scope can be build pretty tight it just depends on what we negotiate!

Look I have zero problem being critical, and our MEC/Negotiators are drilling down in scope... so we’re all about to get a chance to put our money where our mouths are on the subject, but, 60 new captain slots, an additional 13 options in the next 3 years, and launching service to Belize seems like a pretty decent step forward to me.

Now Imagine if we had Southwest’s scope.

Yawn.

Traditional LCC/ULCC business model doesn't involve hub n' spoke with regional feed anyway. They got scope easily because
1) It was worth something in negotiations.
2) The company didn't need it anyway. Although SWA probably wishes they had more flexibility today.

AS pilots probably could have got it on the cheap too pre-horizon, although I don't pretend to know all of the history.

Pre 1986 Horizon or pre 2011 Horizon.....

https://simpleflying.com/alaska-cancels-a320neo-roder/

Alaska Airlines Finally Cancels Its 30 Airbus A320neo Aircraft Order

• by Jay Singh
• November 5, 2021

Alaska Airlines no longer has an order for 30 Airbus A320neo aircraft on the books. Airbus released updated orders and deliveries numbers of October with no Airbus A320neo orders recorded for Alaska Airlines. Further, Alaska Airlines also has indicated it no longer has any Airbus aircraft orders remaining.

Alaska Airlines no longer has A320neo orders

Alaska Airlines used to have an order for 30 Airbus A320neo aircraft on the books. The airline had never taken delivery of a single plane from this order as it wanted to move to a more streamlined fleet centered around the Boeing 737 MAX fleet. However, it maintained the order for quite some time before finally now canceling it.

Airbus no longer counts Alaska as an Airbus A320neo customer as of its latest October orders and deliveries report. Furthermore, in a quarter filing released on Thursday, Alaska Airlines detailed its order book as consisting only of 74 firm Boeing 737 MAX 9s and 12 firm Embraer E175s. The airline previously listed the Airbus A320neo as part of its firm order book, which is now absent.

Alaska’s Airbus A320neo orders

Alaska Airlines inherited an order for 30 Airbus A320neo aircraft when it acquired Virgin America. While the two airlines had complementary route networks, it became clear that the fleet would be a problem. Alaska Airlines had an all-Boeing fleet while Virgin America had an all-Airbus fleet.

Until 2020 hit, Alaska Airlines was operating a mixed fleet. It did not have enough Boeing aircraft on order to officially announce retirement dates for the Airbus A320 fleet, and the grounding of the Boeing 737 MAX clouded some of that planning.



Boeing was a financial supporter of the Virgin America acquisition as well. In a report in the Seattle Times, former CEO of Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Ray Conner, stated that Boeing had provided Alaska a $400 million loan secured by Alaska’s existing 737 MAX commitments. The relationship between Alaska and Boeing was quite strong. The slogan “Proudly All Boeing” was also plastered at the nose of its Boeing mainline fleet.


The Airbus orders remained on the book, but the carrier defined them as a “cancelable” order. At the latest schedule, the first of these aircraft were scheduled for delivery starting in 2024. However, it became evident in December that Alaska would not be taking on any of these Airbus A320neo aircraft orders.

Alaska and the Boeing 737 MAX

Alaska Airlines first started its real transition back to an all-Boeing fleet in November of 2020. The airline announced a new transaction that would lead to the swap of 10 Airbus A320ceos from Alaska’s fleet in favor of leases for 13 new Boeing 737 MAX 9 aircraft from Air Lease Corporation.

In December, Alaska Airlines announced an upsize of its Boeing 737 MAX order to total 68 new aircraft. This included the 737 MAX leases announced in November. At that time, Alaska Airlines also announced it would accelerate its Airbus retirements, so all of those aircraft would exit the fleet by 2023, all in favor of the 737 MAX. Alaska also made it clear it had no plans to take on any of those A320neos on the books.



Alaska added some firm 737 MAX aircraft a few times this year and also backfilled some options. It has a history of taking all of its order options, which could be a huge deal for its fleet, and may also help facilitate a renewal of the 737 Next Generation fleet in favor of the MAX aircraft.


Maintaining the Airbus A320neo order book had some competitive advantage for Alaska. If Boeing was somehow unable to fulfill its fleet needs, it could look to Airbus to renegotiate a price that would keep Alaska flying a mixed fleet without taking on the added cost pressures. Ultimately, Alaska and Boeing reached agreements that worked, so it became clear the Airbus deal would not last.

The one Airbus type that will stay in Alaska’s fleet for at least the next few years are the Airbus A321neos. Alaska has ten of these planes in its fleet with no clear way to get them out of the fleet. For now, Alaska will keep them flying. But, without the A320neo on the books, Alaska is further stressing its preference for an all-Boeing fleet.

I'm always disappointed by the legacy folks litany of excuses of why they don't have an industry standard contract. The crux of their argument is that "Alaska is different."

No, Alaska is not different, nor is it small. At 3,000 pilots, Alaska is bigger than America West was at the time when they acquired US Airways. Alaska is 50% the size of Northwest Airlines at its peak, which operated 7 different fleet types.
The consolidation of the majors has skewed perceptions and allowed the lie that Alaska Airlines is a small airline that can't afford good work rules to perpetuate.

The excuse making of why Alaska lags behind in contracts needs to end. Today.

I'm a somewhat objective observer. Correct that they (not me) should have dealt with this a long time ago.

Also true that it's harder than it would be at a ULCC, especially trying to play catch-up and acquire in one fell swoop what the other legacies built up over years.