![]() |
Originally Posted by flyprdu
(Post 3321284)
I'm always disappointed by the legacy folks litany of excuses of why they don't have an industry standard contract. The crux of their argument is that "Alaska is different."
The excuse making of why Alaska lags behind in contracts needs to end. Today. They are now the minority and changes are coming. We will fight as hard now as they should have fought then. But they had other objectives. |
Originally Posted by PNWFlyer
(Post 3321901)
well Alaska is different from the other airlines you mentioned.. Alaska is still here. To get a better contact you have to be willing to burn the house down. The older pilots with their pensions were not willing to do that. So, we have the contract they gave us.
They are now the minority and changes are coming. We will fight as hard now as they should have fought then. But they had other objectives. |
Originally Posted by OTZeagle1
(Post 3322141)
That might be the dumbest post of the year… Pure nonsense, dude you are clueless. Gross generalization about something you know absolutely nothing about. Perfect, are you a member of team marvel by chance?🤞🤞🤞
Apparently, I know more that you do. Or just more than you care to admit you know. |
There's no quicker way to upset the old timers than to dispel the myth that they have the best jobs in the industry.
Or to call attention to their history of rolling over for the company in the hopes of securing a backdoor deal for the connected. Being happy at Alaska requires multiple levels of denial. They don't appreciate anyone holding up mirrors. |
Originally Posted by PNWFlyer
(Post 3322373)
well of course it’s a gross generalization, this is the Internet. It is however wrong to say I know nothing about it. Please enlighten us on how the pilot group fought tooth and nail to get scope before and after Kasher. How many Union leaders at that time ended up in Management after getting non industry standard contracts passed by the pilot group?
Apparently, I know more that you do. Or just more than you care to admit you know. Yes, we had a no-strike clause for decades, but that went away in 2005 with the Kasher arbitration. He was the first to deny us scope while admitting we deserved it, the JCBA arbitration was the second. The company has told us to our faces that scope is "off the table". Right now we have a unified group, willing and able to ask the federal mediator to declare an impasse and release us to legal self help after a 30 day cooling off period. We tried to do this through arbitration and keep metal moving. There is no other option for us at the moment than for the mediator to declare an impasse and let the processes spelled out in the Railway Labor Act come to pass. For you to point to the past will only serve for this unified pilot group to lose direction. |
Originally Posted by Singlecoil
(Post 3322417)
Where we are now is we are a pilot group that has twice taken scope to binding arbitration, twice been told by the arbitrators that we deserved scope, and twice been told that they couldn't create an item from scratch. Other airlines have had to strike to get scope protection. Isn't that what American went on strike for in the late '90's? You remember, the strike that lasted 5 minutes before Clinton declared a PEB?
Yes, we had a no-strike clause for decades, but that went away in 2005 with the Kasher arbitration. He was the first to deny us scope while admitting we deserved it, the JCBA arbitration was the second. The company has told us to our faces that scope is "off the table". Right now we have a unified group, willing and able to ask the federal mediator to declare an impasse and release us to legal self help after a 30 day cooling off period. We tried to do this through arbitration and keep metal moving. There is no other option for us at the moment than for the mediator to declare an impasse and let the processes spelled out in the Railway Labor Act come to pass. For you to point to the past will only serve for this unified pilot group to lose direction. |
Originally Posted by ShyGuy
(Post 3322494)
So now the primary leverage is getting an impasse declared for the 30 day cooling? What do you honestly think the chances are of that.
Please inform us on your experience with the NMB. |
Originally Posted by flyprdu
(Post 3322572)
Pretty good given enough time. What's your depth of experience that makes you think it's unlikely? Pinnacle?
Please inform us on your experience with the NMB. |
Originally Posted by Jetspeed
(Post 3322629)
You obviously didn't pay attention to Frontier's experience with the NMB. We were the textbook case for being released, but the NMB went silent when we asked them to declare an impasse in 2018.
|
Originally Posted by Singlecoil
(Post 3322417)
Where we are now is we are a pilot group that has twice taken scope to binding arbitration, twice been told by the arbitrators that we deserved scope, and twice been told that they couldn't create an item from scratch. Other airlines have had to strike to get scope protection. Isn't that what American went on strike for in the late '90's? You remember, the strike that lasted 5 minutes before Clinton declared a PEB?
Yes, we had a no-strike clause for decades, but that went away in 2005 with the Kasher arbitration. He was the first to deny us scope while admitting we deserved it, the JCBA arbitration was the second. The company has told us to our faces that scope is "off the table". Right now we have a unified group, willing and able to ask the federal mediator to declare an impasse and release us to legal self help after a 30 day cooling off period. We tried to do this through arbitration and keep metal moving. There is no other option for us at the moment than for the mediator to declare an impasse and let the processes spelled out in the Railway Labor Act come to pass. For you to point to the past will only serve for this unified pilot group to lose direction. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:40 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands