Alaska General Discussion
#1631
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: May 2023
Posts: 523
Nobody would disagree, but what would those protections look like in contract language?
And yes there are those who would burn it down because they don’t see what’s in it for them or just don’t want to mess with AZ under any circumstances without trying to mitigate risks like contract language.
And yes there are those who would burn it down because they don’t see what’s in it for them or just don’t want to mess with AZ under any circumstances without trying to mitigate risks like contract language.
When losing AZ flying hurts more than the renewal concessions they offer, that's when you're upside down in that relationship. AS/HA cannot allow ourselves to get so invested in this flying that we can't walk away from it.
#1632
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,282
Im sure there are many things we can come up with if we brain storm, but after my 15seconds of thinking about it the few that come to mind would be Incentive Leaves, voluntary leaves with bennies, reduced flying lines (40 or 50 hour, full bennies), increased reserve staffing in all bases to whatever% (higher than whatever lean model they like to staff), etc. Normal furlough mitigation stuff that usually takes place before a furlough, but isnt written in the contract.
#1633
Im sure there are many things we can come up with if we brain storm, but after my 15seconds of thinking about it the few that come to mind would be Incentive Leaves, voluntary leaves with bennies, reduced flying lines (40 or 50 hour, full bennies), increased reserve staffing in all bases to whatever% (higher than whatever lean model they like to staff), etc. Normal furlough mitigation stuff that usually takes place before a furlough, but isnt written in the contract.
#1634
The Amazon flying is as good as gone....or in AS C Suite speak "were intrigued". This reminds me of the "final fleet decisions haven't been made" mantra in the 7 years following the VA merger. The decision to go back to single fleet was never in doubt. They were just trying to mitigate training costs hopefully preventing an exodus to the 73 and making the 320 a junior pass through. Happened anyway.
If you are at HA I would seriously reconsider basing your plans on that flying staying around. Its not in AS's DNA to pay you to travel to work, to fly on min margins, and subject themselves to Amazons whims and whipsaws.
I will quote BM at flight path years ago during our pilot break out session when asked about Amazon contract flying for our current cargo fleet, "we just couldn't make the numbers work with Amazon"
If you are at HA I would seriously reconsider basing your plans on that flying staying around. Its not in AS's DNA to pay you to travel to work, to fly on min margins, and subject themselves to Amazons whims and whipsaws.
I will quote BM at flight path years ago during our pilot break out session when asked about Amazon contract flying for our current cargo fleet, "we just couldn't make the numbers work with Amazon"
#1635
The Amazon flying is as good as gone....or in AS C Suite speak "were intrigued". This reminds me of the "final fleet decisions haven't been made" mantra in the 7 years following the VA merger. The decision to go back to single fleet was never in doubt. They were just trying to mitigate training costs hopefully preventing an exodus to the 73 and making the 320 a junior pass through. Happened anyway.
If you are at HA I would seriously reconsider basing your plans on that flying staying around. Its not in AS's DNA to pay you to travel to work, to fly on min margins, and subject themselves to Amazons whims and whipsaws.
I will quote BM at flight path years ago during our pilot break out session when asked about Amazon contract flying for our current cargo fleet, "we just couldn't make the numbers work with Amazon"
If you are at HA I would seriously reconsider basing your plans on that flying staying around. Its not in AS's DNA to pay you to travel to work, to fly on min margins, and subject themselves to Amazons whims and whipsaws.
I will quote BM at flight path years ago during our pilot break out session when asked about Amazon contract flying for our current cargo fleet, "we just couldn't make the numbers work with Amazon"
#1637
#1639
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2015
Posts: 1,007
Yep. And Boeing is going to cover none of the lost revenues on the max-9. Just like the Neos or Just ask SWA about their Max groundings. The best Boeing or any manufacturer can do is keep digging themselves in the hole by giving away their unflyable airplanes. All these oversized paperweights are getting cheaper….
just a Russian roulette as to which airplane is up.
just a Russian roulette as to which airplane is up.
https://apnews.com/article/boeing-co...297fb14eee7ff0
#1640
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2022
Position: PA31-350; Left
Posts: 118
I'd like to see them want to attempt to be taken seriously in a conversation with the Delta, United and American. They would need presence on both coasts. They need to be open to having a narrow body fleet consisting of both Airbus and Boeing. A future event similar to the MAX door/grounding or PW engine with a single type seemly looks like it would leave you exposed. Alaska with a service map that covers Sydney to Amsterdam.
Build your presence in Mid-America organiclly.
I won't be holding my breath.
Last edited by TwOtter; 04-05-2024 at 08:33 AM. Reason: /s
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post