Alaska General Discussion
#232
Line Holder
Joined: Mar 2022
Posts: 1,891
Likes: 186
My stance is we should get paid as much as possible based on what we are worth. Isn't that where you stand? I think we did pretty well last year. If you include 10.5% PBP we were the highest paid 737 operators in the world. I'm currently on track to close in on 450-500k this year including DC.
It's really unfortunate you feel so mistreated and undervalued by Alaska. Never before in the history of aviation have there been more opportunities to leave. It's not worth being unhappy! Perhaps the grass is greener at another carrier? I definitely don't think that it is but clearly you have a different view.
It's really unfortunate you feel so mistreated and undervalued by Alaska. Never before in the history of aviation have there been more opportunities to leave. It's not worth being unhappy! Perhaps the grass is greener at another carrier? I definitely don't think that it is but clearly you have a different view.
I’ll still try and reason with you to at least see my point of view and hope that you won’t make personal attacks but I’m not expecting much.
It’s great you’re making a lot of money. As an FO I hope I will have the same opportunity. Certainly things we did achieve with the contract such as scope will lead to an earlier upgrade and I hope to bring in the kind of money you claim to be doing. I do hope that you realize last years retro pay was pennies on the dollar for your labor from April of 2019 to September of 2022. I wouldn’t be terribly excited about a small year over year pay bump for 2022. If that makes you happy that’s great. However you should keep in mind the massive 2022 profit margin you’re gloating over came at the cost of your employer undervaluing your labor and not negotiating in good faith for almost 3 years.
Things aren’t all about money. I do recall how vacation open time for trading being taken from the pilot group negatively affected my QOL and continues to do so,, the delayed implementation of third step and ongoing IT debacle continue to affect my QOL, and constant short staffing continue to affect my QOL. All of these things lead to a large profit margin for MGMT. So when I say “about that big profit margin.” I’m pointing to issues that need to be solved which would lessen that margin. As labor undervaluing your labor isn’t something to be proud of. I’m not going to gloat over the fact my employer undervalued my labor and my QOL to achieve a big profit.
Hope that this clears things up for you and you won’t personally attack me for doing so.
#233
I’ve discovered when discussing issues at an employer if someone’s go to response is: “if you don’t like it leave”. They cannot be reasoned with and they tend to be a lot more prone to things like angry outbursts and personal attacks.
I’ll still try and reason with you to at least see my point of view and hope that you won’t make personal attacks but I’m not expecting much.
It’s great you’re making a lot of money. As an FO I hope I will have the same opportunity. Certainly things we did achieve with the contract such as scope will lead to an earlier upgrade and I hope to bring in the kind of money you claim to be doing. I do hope that you realize last years retro pay was pennies on the dollar for your labor from April of 2019 to September of 2022. I wouldn’t be terribly excited about a small year over year pay bump for 2022. If that makes you happy that’s great. However you should keep in mind the massive 2022 profit margin you’re gloating over came at the cost of your employer undervaluing your labor and not negotiating in good faith for almost 3 years.
Things aren’t all about money. I do recall how vacation open time for trading being taken from the pilot group negatively affected my QOL and continues to do so,, the delayed implementation of third step and ongoing IT debacle continue to affect my QOL, and constant short staffing continue to affect my QOL. All of these things lead to a large profit margin for MGMT. So when I say “about that big profit margin.” I’m pointing to issues that need to be solved which would lessen that margin. As labor undervaluing your labor isn’t something to be proud of. I’m not going to gloat over the fact my employer undervalued my labor and my QOL to achieve a big profit.
Hope that this clears things up for you and you won’t personally attack me for doing so.
I’ll still try and reason with you to at least see my point of view and hope that you won’t make personal attacks but I’m not expecting much.
It’s great you’re making a lot of money. As an FO I hope I will have the same opportunity. Certainly things we did achieve with the contract such as scope will lead to an earlier upgrade and I hope to bring in the kind of money you claim to be doing. I do hope that you realize last years retro pay was pennies on the dollar for your labor from April of 2019 to September of 2022. I wouldn’t be terribly excited about a small year over year pay bump for 2022. If that makes you happy that’s great. However you should keep in mind the massive 2022 profit margin you’re gloating over came at the cost of your employer undervaluing your labor and not negotiating in good faith for almost 3 years.
Things aren’t all about money. I do recall how vacation open time for trading being taken from the pilot group negatively affected my QOL and continues to do so,, the delayed implementation of third step and ongoing IT debacle continue to affect my QOL, and constant short staffing continue to affect my QOL. All of these things lead to a large profit margin for MGMT. So when I say “about that big profit margin.” I’m pointing to issues that need to be solved which would lessen that margin. As labor undervaluing your labor isn’t something to be proud of. I’m not going to gloat over the fact my employer undervalued my labor and my QOL to achieve a big profit.
Hope that this clears things up for you and you won’t personally attack me for doing so.
#234
Line Holder
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 391
Likes: 4
Nicely stated. Unfortunately you will get nothing but derision and and name calling from the other side. I just shake my head when the “If you don’t like it, leave” argument comes out. I’m a 13 year Captain and I have less than 5 years left. I don’t like it and I’m not going anywhere. Now I’ll get the Eagle calling me the angry 30. Not true. I’ve just been at 4-5 airlines prior that we’re WAY better than the present one so I have something to compare it to. I have not been at Alaska for 35 years as my only major airline job. Getting abused and having battered wife/Stockholm syndrome.
#235
Isn’t that a sauce?
Joined: May 2022
Posts: 280
Likes: 0
#237
You’re hammering his nail home for him.
Only someone that hasn’t been flying 121 for very long (comparatively) would insinuate that the reason you’re not at one of your previous airlines prior to Alaska,…. is because you “left”. They probably “left” because they either got a furlough notice or the airline ceased operation, or both. Something nobody who started less than ten years ago has ever fathomed.
Only someone that hasn’t been flying 121 for very long (comparatively) would insinuate that the reason you’re not at one of your previous airlines prior to Alaska,…. is because you “left”. They probably “left” because they either got a furlough notice or the airline ceased operation, or both. Something nobody who started less than ten years ago has ever fathomed.
#239
Line Holder
Joined: Jul 2022
Posts: 298
Likes: 16
And they have probably complained just as much when they were at all of them too…probably should have just chosen a different career if they hate it all that much
#240
Line Holder
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 391
Likes: 4
You’re hammering his nail home for him.
Only someone that hasn’t been flying 121 for very long (comparatively) would insinuate that the reason you’re not at one of your previous airlines prior to Alaska,…. is because you “left”. They probably “left” because they either got a furlough notice or the airline ceased operation, or both. Something nobody who started less than ten years ago has ever fathomed.
Only someone that hasn’t been flying 121 for very long (comparatively) would insinuate that the reason you’re not at one of your previous airlines prior to Alaska,…. is because you “left”. They probably “left” because they either got a furlough notice or the airline ceased operation, or both. Something nobody who started less than ten years ago has ever fathomed.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



