Snap up pay for SWA
12-02-2023, 01:51 PM
#21
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2018
Posts: 692
This equation applies to JB before it applies to us. They would average up to $356 in August. So if SW does sign at $364 for '24, our average in September will look more like: (JB 356)+(DL 360)+(UL 360)+(AA 360)+(SW 364)= 1800/5= $360.
12-02-2023, 02:19 PM
#22
Line Holder
Joined APC: Jun 2019
Position: Captain
Posts: 283
Originally Posted by KnockKnock
This equation applies to JB before it applies to us. They would average up to $356 in August. So if SW does sign at $364 for '24, our average in September will look more like: (JB 356)+(DL 360)+(UL 360)+(AA 360)+(SW 364)= 1800/5= $360.
12-03-2023, 09:19 AM
#24
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jan 2015
Posts: 384
I’m getting a lot of conflicting info from APC.
When reading through your TA don’t immediately look at pay rates, that’s not a good indicator for how good a CBA is. Read through the entire contract to make an informed decision.
Also, Make sure you get a snap up clause that’s tied only to pay rates. Hard No Without it. Can’t be an average snap up either, gotta be plus 1, unless you’re okay dragging the entire industry down.
When reading through your TA don’t immediately look at pay rates, that’s not a good indicator for how good a CBA is. Read through the entire contract to make an informed decision.
Also, Make sure you get a snap up clause that’s tied only to pay rates. Hard No Without it. Can’t be an average snap up either, gotta be plus 1, unless you’re okay dragging the entire industry down.
12-20-2023, 12:57 PM
#25
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2015
Posts: 986
Originally Posted by Lakeaffect
I’m getting a lot of conflicting info from APC.
When reading through your TA don’t immediately look at pay rates, that’s not a good indicator for how good a CBA is. Read through the entire contract to make an informed decision.
Also, Make sure you get a snap up clause that’s tied only to pay rates. Hard No Without it. Can’t be an average snap up either, gotta be plus 1, unless you’re okay dragging the entire industry down.
When reading through your TA don’t immediately look at pay rates, that’s not a good indicator for how good a CBA is. Read through the entire contract to make an informed decision.
Also, Make sure you get a snap up clause that’s tied only to pay rates. Hard No Without it. Can’t be an average snap up either, gotta be plus 1, unless you’re okay dragging the entire industry down.
12-20-2023, 01:14 PM
#26
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2018
Posts: 692
Originally Posted by PNWFlyer
looks like Average is going to do quite well for us with the new SWA rates. Especially for FOs.
12-20-2023, 01:41 PM
#27
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2015
Posts: 986
Originally Posted by KnockKnock
The average rate adjustment is based on TOS CA rates and will look like the above calculation. TOS CA will increase to $360/hr on 9/1/24 (if SW votes this in). F.O. rates are adjusted from there per OUR CBA, not per SW's FO-CA percentage. Our F.O. rates won't be getting extra percentage points.
12-20-2023, 01:45 PM
#28
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: May 2023
Posts: 495
Originally Posted by PNWFlyer
ah, no one likes FOs anyway. But this could put us between SWA and Everyone else. Delta +1 would not do that, it would just make us equal and below average. This is when average works out.
We're close, but let's not kid ourselves.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
