Search

Notices

Alaska Air Hiring

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-29-2025 | 05:20 PM
  #8221  
beancounter's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 393
Likes: 19
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777
That might make sense, if you got hired before age 30. And will not suffer personal financial catastrophe if you get furloughed for 2-4 years (plenty of folks have low household expenses, side hustle, Sugar Momma, etc).
I remember before I left flying with and meeting in training, both a guy and a gal that had been at ALK 10+. Thought they were nuts, but I was nice and positive about AA. With 20/20 hindsight I’d go Delta first, then Alaska.
Reply
Old 04-29-2025 | 05:26 PM
  #8222  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jan 2023
Posts: 295
Likes: 44
Default

Originally Posted by Jet J
Exactly, this merger presents no benefit to the Alaska group. It’s laughable that we’re getting told this is a win because we get to pick and choose a few more favorable work rules from a below industry standard contract. Or because wIDe BoDiEs, which will be fenced and cost us un-proportional seniority losses.

We should be fighting for well above industry standard NB rates and work rules, to compensate for the suck that’s coming our way.
This merger presents no benefit to the HAL group. It’s destroying our quality of life and upending the entire reason we all came to HAL. We can agree we are all unhappy about this shotgun marriage.

No HAL pilot has ever left to go work for Alaska, however I have flown with a few that left Alaska to come to HAL.

We should be fighting for above industry standard pay rates and work rules.

Reply
Old 04-29-2025 | 05:51 PM
  #8223  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Mar 2022
Posts: 1,886
Likes: 183
Default

Originally Posted by MinRest
Staunch pessimism isn't a strategy either, yet here you are. There is at least one aircraft in flight test and at least 3 getting ready to flight test. The delivery schedule is very close to being back to projected.
We can go through the basics:

- Pessimism isn’t a strategy. That’s not what’s going on here. Pessimism is what your rather poor interpretation of things is, entirely in your own head.

- Looking at the delivery schedule, delays and a realistic take on the SLI isn’t being pessimistic. It’s being realistic and practical about my career outlook.

- My strategy is to prepare for a downgrade. Due to a reduction bid on the 737. Or a reduction bid post SLI where some HAL pilots who no longer wish to commute bid for SEA 737. That’s what a strategy is.

- Being hopeful this all works out for the best isn’t a strategy. Having a back up plan I don’t want to go through with is.
Reply
Old 04-29-2025 | 06:13 PM
  #8224  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Mar 2022
Posts: 1,886
Likes: 183
Default

Originally Posted by Jetlikespeed
You can still bid short call reserve
I can not hold short call reserve. I am unstacked every weekend between Friday and Monday and I am always pushed into long call convertible reserve with many circadian flips and red eyes. There is a reason it goes junior. I'd hope that after being on reserve for 2 years I could at lest hold short call reserve but I can not. I bid for it every month.

You can look at the secondary reserve bid award on the pilot webpage. It would take you less than 30 seconds.
Reply
Old 04-29-2025 | 07:15 PM
  #8225  
Your ball struck my foot.
 
Joined: Dec 2023
Posts: 250
Likes: 49
From: Uncertain
Default

Originally Posted by Akamai
This merger presents no benefit to the HAL group. It’s destroying our quality of life and upending the entire reason we all came to HAL. We can agree we are all unhappy about this shotgun marriage.
I can think of a major one for the HAL group. It's that you get to continue to be employed as an airline pilot. Instead of starting over at the bottom of someone else's seniority list, you get to pontificate about how much more deserving you are of our seniority spots than we are. Seems like a big win for you.
Reply
Old 04-29-2025 | 07:20 PM
  #8226  
Jet J's Avatar
Line Holder
Veteran: Space Force
 
Joined: Feb 2018
Posts: 519
Likes: 87
Default

Originally Posted by Akamai
This merger presents no benefit to the HAL group. It’s destroying our quality of life and upending the entire reason we all came to HAL. We can agree we are all unhappy about this shotgun marriage.

No HAL pilot has ever left to go work for Alaska, however I have flown with a few that left Alaska to come to HAL.

We should be fighting for above industry standard pay rates and work rules.
Other than avoiding impending BK and a management team who knows how to make money sure bro. And now we get to hear how it’s only fair that we are below you on the list 🤗

Wonder why QOL was so good? It was fantasy land. Wasn’t making money. But sure blame Alaska for making things efficient and profitable 😂
Reply
Old 04-29-2025 | 10:56 PM
  #8227  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jan 2023
Posts: 295
Likes: 44
Default

Originally Posted by Jet J
Other than avoiding impending BK and a management team who knows how to make money sure bro. And now we get to hear how it’s only fair that we are below you on the list 🤗

Wonder why QOL was so good? It was fantasy land. Wasn’t making money. But sure blame Alaska for making things efficient and profitable 😂
HAL is the states largest employer and wasn’t going away but thanks for saving us. We have been around for 96 years and were very profitable prior to COVID. None of us wanted this but yet here we are.

I’m not saying what’s fair and how the SLI should go, I have merely pointed out what’s happened historically. The arbitrator will decide whats “fair” and we’ll all be unhappy.

Perhaps we should focus on getting improvements for ALL pilots in the JCBA.

Reply
Old 04-29-2025 | 11:05 PM
  #8228  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jan 2023
Posts: 295
Likes: 44
Default

Originally Posted by Yakattack
I can think of a major one for the HAL group. It's that you get to continue to be employed as an airline pilot. Instead of starting over at the bottom of someone else's seniority list, you get to pontificate about how much more deserving you are of our seniority spots than we are. Seems like a big win for you.
HAL wasn’t going away but cool theory.

I’m not pontificating, but rather trying to provide some historical insight after three decades in this career.

There is a reason the JCBA comes before the SLI now. Perhaps we should focus on getting an industry leading JCBA.
Reply
Old 04-30-2025 | 04:56 AM
  #8229  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Aug 2022
Posts: 809
Likes: 99
Default

Originally Posted by Jet J
Other than avoiding impending BK and a management team who knows how to make money sure bro. And now we get to hear how it’s only fair that we are below you on the list 🤗

Wonder why QOL was so good? It was fantasy land. Wasn’t making money. But sure blame Alaska for making things efficient and profitable 😂
We have some real "living their best life" dreamers... The rest of us who look at it more rationally know of the life line and potential huge upswing we were just gifted.

After more than a quarter century in the business, multiple furloughs, bankruptcies, pay freezes and CEO's lying, I know the other option wasn't gonna be good. (And given our propensity for taking in the shorts to keep everything "local" we would have been handed something worse than an ULCC contract)
Reply
Old 04-30-2025 | 05:05 AM
  #8230  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Aug 2022
Posts: 809
Likes: 99
Default

Originally Posted by Akamai
HAL is the states largest employer and wasn’t going away but thanks for saving us. We have been around for 96 years and were very profitable prior to COVID. None of us wanted this but yet here we are.

I’m not saying what’s fair and how the SLI should go, I have merely pointed out what’s happened historically. The arbitrator will decide whats “fair” and we’ll all be unhappy.

Perhaps we should focus on getting improvements for ALL pilots in the JCBA.
It's a small State, that's not saying a whole lot. Our competition routinely supports roughly 10-15x the size.

My guess is we didn't need that many employees but nepotism is strong in HI and we were losing our shorts for 4+ years while everyone else was killing it. Our business would literally continue to be a losing effort as long as Japan (and the rest of that side of the Pacific) is not traveling. Japan hasn't even come back to the 40% mark because they destroyed their dollar. HI still compares everything to 2019 while the rest of the Country has rebounded or never succumbed to the lunacy in the first place. P.I. plan, as a typical accountant does, was to cut routes to profitability. Problem is he wasn't going to cut a route and add a new one. He was going to cut a route and just increase where we already flew to.

Adding one route a year and calling it a win wan't that Earth shattering. Going from "Content" to that 365 thing isn't ground breaking either, but that's what we waste our bandwidth on.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
vagabond
Hangar Talk
1
05-03-2011 05:44 PM
joel payne
Foreign
4
04-23-2009 01:38 PM
vagabond
Major
31
04-15-2009 08:51 AM
vagabond
Aviation Law
10
09-20-2008 12:50 PM
vagabond
Major
19
06-15-2007 06:29 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices