![]() |
It's my understanding that anyone at the school can accept the deal at any point before they have completed their R-ATP. This includes a CFI teaching at the college with 999 hours and no RATP, which they will have a large sum of their tuition debt wiped if they sign a training contract. The exact details to be announced soon. You only need 1000 TT civilian or 750 TT mil for the RATP with a bachelors or 1250 TT associates degree.
|
I think they are either vastly overstating or over estimating the significance of a flight school partnership like this. Private pilots are already interviewing at united, I don’t see the real attraction to allegiants program. At best it only kicks the can a few years down the road when the attrition from the people who’s commitment expires skyrockets. Who could possibly predict a bunch of 20 year olds, who have no family, and have never spent time on the road on overnights wouldn’t want to stick around for a discount priced career at allegiant :rolleyes:
|
Point taken; there are other partnership pathways that land you at a regional with total 1st year pay over $100k & you’re based in a real city from the get-go. Vs. Allegiant - make $50k & have to hopscotch around the small base structure as you wait to finally get to your domicile of choice. Where’s the incentive?
|
Originally Posted by MilDriver
(Post 3530174)
little bit of a bummer on DSM was really hoping for it out of training. I can make it work to get there though I suppose.
|
Originally Posted by Jim Rockford
(Post 3530384)
No reason you can’t get it right out of the gate. I’m thinking no matter which base you insert in that question the peanut gallerys answer will all sound the same.
|
Originally Posted by KC135
(Post 3530436)
It really is unpleasant flying with the new hires who were told they will get any base right away by the recruiters and now Jim. I can tell you haven’t flown with FO’s who are being threatened divorce bc they only make it home a few days per month.
|
Originally Posted by KC135
(Post 3530436)
It really is unpleasant flying with the new hires who were told they will get any base right away by the recruiters and now Jim. I can tell you haven’t flown with FO’s who are being threatened divorce bc they only make it home a few days per month.
Unless the company changed the interview in the last year, a decent part was asking how you would cope with not getting the base you wanted and getting exiled for a year to middle of nowhere base the company can't staff. |
Originally Posted by JediCheese
(Post 3530638)
What did they do at their previous airline? If they've been at an airline previously, they should know the drill. If they haven't been at an airline before, they're either getting divorced because the SO can't hack this lifestyle or they're getting out of this career (at least the airline part of it. The local FBO might be hiring citation pilots for their 135).
Unless the company changed the interview in the last year, a decent part was asking how you would cope with not getting the base you wanted and getting exiled for a year to middle of nowhere base the company can't staff. |
Originally Posted by JediCheese
(Post 3530638)
What did they do at their previous airline? If they've been at an airline previously, they should know the drill. If they haven't been at an airline before, they're either getting divorced because the SO can't hack this lifestyle or they're getting out of this career (at least the airline part of it. The local FBO might be hiring citation pilots for their 135).
Unless the company changed the interview in the last year, a decent part was asking how you would cope with not getting the base you wanted and getting exiled for a year to middle of nowhere base the company can't staff. |
Originally Posted by Jim Rockford
(Post 3530384)
No reason you can’t get it right out of the gate. I’m thinking no matter which base you insert in that question the peanut gallerys answer will all sound the same.
1. Established base where pilots have settled. 2. No growth at present, meaning minimal movement, and barely any backfilling of slots. 3. Attrition and lack of new-hires has resulted in scaling back of flying in many bases, so when someone leaves they aren’t filling that vacancy. 4. Company needs to staff new bases e.g. PVU. The company will put you where they need you, and until we can hire and retain enough pilots to constitute growth, bring on more aircraft etc. this is how things will be for the foreseeable future. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:35 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands