Notices

Allegiant Air

Old 09-19-2015 | 10:19 AM
  #4051  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jul 2015
Posts: 61
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Shiek Yiboudi
The most fun I have had today is irritating you. Because you take everything I say and bend it to the extreme. All my coworkers aren't worthy of doing their jobs? Quote me on that one because what I said is there are crappy pilots here (and crappy attitudes) one or two guys....sorta like you and the other guy on here trying to change what I've said.

Again, arguing about this isn't going to change anything, and I'll believe he'll get his job back when I see his name on a seniority list.

So tell all of APC though because I'm curious, what exactly caused the "smoke" and what was wrong with the plane? Why did CFR tell him twice to hold off on the evac? You say that he wasn't going to evac until CFR said he had "smoke" coming from the back of the engine. (all MD-80s have black fumes spewing from the tailpipe) but then you or the other guy think it's bogus to not evac if CFR advised you not to? YOU can't have it both ways.
As far as the flight attendant, yes he did tell me directly that there wasn't smoke anywhere. That's a fact. Yes he is paranoid and the majority of the FAs think he's to scared to be a flight attendant. Did he lie to me? I don't know....did they lie to the company? Again, I'm NOT referring to ALL my coworkers.
There are a few guys here that beat the drum and keep everyone all charged up. I haven't posted on here for years but I occasionally read this thread and shake my head because it's one of the most ridiculous group of people spouting nonsense. I logged in to state my opinion, I'm tired of repeating myself because guys like you keep attacking and attacking. The reason you do it is to wear everyone down so well stop speaking up, then you can have the last few pages of this thread to propagate your negativity. that's all everyone reads anyway, who's willing to read 400 pages of attacks and insults.
So, have at it. It's your again.
And Lav......sniff sniff........you stink! (sorry couldn't help it)
I'm out, man, have at it.
I was quite literally trying to end that last post somewhat upbeat and encourage you to post something positive or funny. Somewhat of a truce. I mean, you did brag that this is what you do while flying the line.

Have a good day, buddy. I'll see you out there on the line. I'm looking forward to your awkward "no eye contact" chit-chat.
Old 09-19-2015 | 10:31 AM
  #4052  
Shiek Yiboudi's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 90
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by LavStink
I'm out, man, have at it.
I was quite literally trying to end that last post somewhat upbeat and encourage you to post something positive or funny. Somewhat of a truce. I mean, you did brag that this is what you do while flying the line.

Have a good day, buddy. I'll see you out there on the line. I'm looking forward to your awkward "no eye contact" chit-chat.
Bye bye Dave. You can't answer my questions and all the other guy has is "nuh uh" your wrong. Peace.
Old 09-19-2015 | 10:50 AM
  #4053  
Shiek Yiboudi's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 90
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by MD80driver2day
This right here proves that you don't have a clue what you're talking about. CFR did NOT tell them to hold off on the evac... Nope.. Not once... Never. Someone did.... but you clearly have no idea who it was.

I think I'm going to start calling you Mr. Magoo..
Just confirmed with another FA on that trip, there was NO smoke in the cabin or cockpit. NO FIRE indications of any kind from the airplane. He blew the bottles into BOTH engines and did an evac. Maybe he should have shut the engine down that had "black smoke" coming out of the tailpipe and the so called fire would have gone out.

I've heard from multiple sources that CFR DID indeed tell him to hold off on the evac. You can't document that it didn't happen and I can't document that it did. Your word against mine.

But the smoke in the cockpit and cabin is seriously and credibly DEBUNKED so the rest of your opinion hangs with it.

The guy had a smell.....that's it. Did an overweight landing, sat on the taxiway for a long time with NO indications of any problems OF ANY KIND on the airplane, much less a fire.

From the day this happened everyone I know, besides D.P. was saying this guy screwed up. You think it's me? You think that's speaking out of both sides of my mouth?


How do you defend this? Pick better battles. The dude evacuated a perfectly good airplane, NO SMOKE, NO ENGINE FIRE INDICATIONS, NO BELLS, NO WHISTLES.......no indication of any kind. So I should come to his rescue and say that he did the right thing?

The MD-80 is an old airplane, it makes funny noises and has funny smells, creaks, moans and groans....but it WILL tell you if there is a fire in the engine, the tailcone, the lavs and the FAs can see it in the cabin. It was a bad move. Stop acting like Allegiant was in the wrong to fire him.
Old 09-19-2015 | 10:55 AM
  #4054  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 188
Likes: 0
From: MD80
Default

Originally Posted by Shiek Yiboudi
Just confirmed with another FA on that trip, there was NO smoke in the cabin or cockpit. NO FIRE indications of any kind from the airplane. He blew the bottles into BOTH engines and did an evac. Maybe he should have shut the engine down that had "black smoke" coming out of the tailpipe and the so called fire would have gone out.

I've heard from multiple sources that CFR DID indeed tell him to hold off on the evac. You can't document that it didn't happen and I can't document that it did. Your word against mine.

But the smoke in the cockpit and cabin is seriously and credibly DEBUNKED so the rest of your opinion hangs with it.

The guy had a smell.....that's it. Did an overweight landing, sat on the taxiway for a long time with NO indications of any problems OF ANY KIND on the airplane, much less a fire.

From the day this happened everyone I know, besides D.P. was saying this guy screwed up. You think it's me? You think that's speaking out of both sides of my mouth?


How do you defend this? Pick better battles. The dude evacuated a perfectly good airplane, NO SMOKE, NO ENGINE FIRE INDICATIONS, NO BELLS, NO WHISTLES.......no indication of any kind. So I should come to his rescue and say that he did the right thing?

The MD-80 is an old airplane, it makes funny noises and has funny smells, creaks, moans and groans....but it WILL tell you if there is a fire in the engine, the tailcone, the lavs and the FAs can see it in the cabin. It was a bad move. Stop acting like Allegiant was in the wrong to fire him.
You really are a tool Mr. Magoo... a big time tool.
Old 09-19-2015 | 11:05 AM
  #4055  
Vegaspilot's Avatar
Gets Tue/Wed and Sat Off
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 559
Likes: 0
Default

CFR never once told him to hold off. They informed him of smoke coming from the left engine. That's it. He had no intention of an evac until that point, combined with the fact CFR wouldn't reply to his numerous calls after that fact. Someone said one time on frequency "to hold off on the evac", but no one was ever able to confirm who that was. The GOM specifically states to consider an evac for fire or suspected fire. He had just air returned for a burning smell and then CFR informs you of smoke from the left engine. Then CFR goes NORDO and now he has to make a decision based on what he knows at that point. Maybe in hindsight the evac wasn't required, but I'm not going to second guess this crew and their decision. He followed our GOM and was fired for it.
Old 09-19-2015 | 11:11 AM
  #4056  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 697
Likes: 9
From: A-320
Default

Originally Posted by Thunderpig
There are a lot of people optimistic here, but honest about how things could improve and how painful stuff has been...it's a tradeoff and coming here, you need to have your eyes wide open. If a reasonable contract is signed and they improve some of the mx issues, this could be one of the best jobs around. We will never, ever make Delta money...and this isn't a dumping ground of sketchy pilots. Talked to an APD today and he was wicked impressed with the product that had gotten to him by the oral/type. Good stuff (some) is happening...it just doesn't effect lots of the senior guys/gals much...and the rumor mongering is ridiculous.
Originally Posted by Jetpipe30
G4 FO here. First time posting. Just wanted to chime in and say this place is not nearly as bad as what these full time keyboard commandos are saying. Yes we need a contract. We will get one. I have a couple kids, can't imagine being anywhere else being gone for multiple days in a row. The pay scale gets better after year one. They pay for your hotel during training now, Pure reserve is not that bad if you live in base. It's September, a slow month by Allegiant standards. I haven't flown since Sept 2nd. Quality of life is something that cannot be measured. We are expanding and growing. All of the horror stories of being TDY'd for months at a time are non existent. When you are an initial newnhire you might have to worry about that for a bit, or if you are a new captain. It has its problems. If you come here thinking they don't have issues you will be disappointed. Cue the "that guy must be management" responses.
Originally Posted by Shiek Yiboudi
I'll back up what he's saying. I don't really see much of what these trolls are saying. I like my job. 99.99% of the time I show up to work in the morning, fly out/back and I'm home before my kids get home from school. Our MX guys are good and skilled guys who fix things and I've never had to declare min fuel because dispatch supposedly shorts us. I've had the opposite experience, plenty of good, aware and in the loop dispatchers who take care of us.
Life is good and getting better (contract will happen).

If anyone wants any information on the real life of allegiant pilots then send me a message.
I will also agree with the above. First time posting about my experience here as a relatively new hire. I came here to move to base after commuting for half a decade. This airline is so different from any other airline I've worked for in many ways both good and bad. The day trips are great and I've had multiple groups of 4 consecutive days off in the same month but only in the slow months. Bidding reserve and living in base has been too easy since I've average 2-3 calls a month. In the busy months everybody works and it's hard to get a lot of days off if you aren't in the top 20% of your base since there are lots of low time day trips but I live close to the airport and I don't mind an easy 6 hour duty day when I'm use to busting out 11-12 hr work days daily on 4 day trips. I can't speak for the MD80 or 757 but I had a good experience with training on the airbus and felt well prepared for the oral and checkride (nobody from my class busted).
Some of the work rules here are just straight laughable but I did my homework before I came here and I knew what I was getting into. The TDY is exaggerated on the forums but there really is no excuse for it and yes a few people have been hit hard with it for multiple months. With all the movement new hires don't have to worry about it more than a month or two but you have to be careful about planning your upgrade so you aren't the bottom CA or two in base to avoid it.
Overall I am very pleased with my decision and haven't looked back for a second. All of the captains I have flown with are great and optimistic about a new contract. I am young and will let management decide if this will be a career stay for me by whether we have a new contract or not in a reasonable amount of time. If you want to fly a triple 7 and make 300k this isn't the place for you. As long as you don't try to commute, coming here can pay off big if a new contract arrives and you like being home every night.
Old 09-19-2015 | 11:22 AM
  #4057  
Shiek Yiboudi's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 90
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Vegaspilot
Maybe in hindsight the evac wasn't required, but I'm not going to second guess this crew and their decision. He followed our GOM and was fired for it.
Saying "In hindsight the evac wasn't required" is second guessing him. Of course it wasn't required. Let's discuss more options. He sat there for a long time and didn't ever think to just shut the engine down normally and then wait to see the outcome? What would you really have done? Second guessing is our nature, our training is full of second guessing other pilots and learning.
Old 09-19-2015 | 11:24 AM
  #4058  
Shiek Yiboudi's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 90
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by MD80driver2day
You really are a tool Mr. Magoo... a big time tool.
This is your reply to my post? Is that really all you have after I laid out my case? No reply to any of my points?

Thanks for verifying to everyone on APC that you have nothing else to defend your position with. He should not have evacuated a perfectly good airplane, you know it, I know it.
Old 09-19-2015 | 11:29 AM
  #4059  
Shiek Yiboudi's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 90
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Vegaspilot
CFR never once told him to hold off. They informed him of smoke coming from the left engine. That's it. He had no intention of an evac until that point, combined with the fact CFR wouldn't reply to his numerous calls after that fact. Someone said one time on frequency "to hold off on the evac", but no one was ever able to confirm who that was. The GOM specifically states to consider an evac for fire or suspected fire. t.
Are there tapes of this? We have the bingo Baden ATC tapes but nothing here? That would clear this up real quick.

The GOM says "consider" an evacuation but considering and reacting are two different things. Like I said previous, we should consider other options also. We have multiple ways to indicate fire on an airplane and one source that went NORDO isn't a hard case source.

If there really was a fire, CFR would have been fighting it and communicating.
Old 09-19-2015 | 11:36 AM
  #4060  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jul 2015
Posts: 61
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Shiek Yiboudi
Are there tapes of this? We have the bingo Baden ATC tapes but nothing here? That would clear this up real quick.

The GOM says "consider" an evacuation but considering and reacting are two different things. Like I said previous, we should consider other options also. We have multiple ways to indicate fire on an airplane and one source that went NORDO isn't a hard case source.
Hey Shiek-
I just gave the Captain your number and told him about your tabloid style news reports. You can take it up with him so that we can have all have a break from your gaping, trash talking mouth.

You like apples? How about dem apples?
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
winglet
Regional
47
05-15-2016 09:45 PM
pipercub
Allegiant
32
11-18-2015 09:12 PM
Flameout
Military
32
03-05-2010 12:21 PM
vagabond
Major
19
06-15-2007 06:29 PM
AirWillie
Hiring News
4
11-16-2005 03:35 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices