Search
Notices

787

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-20-2018, 06:36 AM
  #11  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2011
Posts: 420
Default

Because that’s how Boeing has always done it. Seems appropriate for AA too...
DarinFred is offline  
Old 02-20-2018, 06:52 AM
  #12  
Gets Weekends Off
 
AFPirate's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: C-17s / A320
Posts: 149
Default 787 forecast

Jun Vacancy bid shows junior man at LAX 787 at 10,7xx, ORD at 9,7xx, and DFW at 8,3xx. Considering that we receive 6 more 787-900s by EOY 2018 and 2 more 787-900s by EOY 2019, I'd say the junior man number will go even lower as the category expands. I believe the company has mentioned that the DFW fleet may shrink more while the ORD fleet continues to expand. Best bets to hold it quickly would be LAX and ORD...I imagine the junior man at LAX will be around #11,500 to #12,000 once the fleet is complete by EOY 2019. We have 14,800 pilots on property...the retirements listed on APC are pretty close to what's listed on internals but don't take into account the extra 10-15% that leave early. I'd agree 4-5 years is a safe bet.
AFPirate is offline  
Old 02-20-2018, 09:09 AM
  #13  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,483
Default

Originally Posted by jcountry View Post
WHEN the retirements really kick in, things WILL change fast.
Fixed it for you.
TallFlyer is offline  
Old 02-20-2018, 09:16 AM
  #14  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2014
Posts: 1,681
Default

Originally Posted by TallFlyer View Post
Fixed it for you.
I sure hope so!
jcountry is offline  
Old 02-20-2018, 09:33 AM
  #15  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2016
Position: 6th place
Posts: 1,826
Default

Originally Posted by Sliceback View Post
Head smacking truth!!!! What a waste of space.



But Airbus has a side stick and Boeing can’t admit someone has a better mouse trap.


Same with Airbus not admitting moving thrust levers when using auto throttles are better. 🤦🏻*♀️
mainlineAF is offline  
Old 02-20-2018, 10:22 AM
  #16  
You scratched my anchor
 
Al Czervik's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2011
Posts: 4,876
Default

Originally Posted by mainlineAF View Post
Same with Airbus not admitting moving thrust levers when using auto throttles are better. 🤦🏻*♀️
Looking for something to guard?
Al Czervik is offline  
Old 02-22-2018, 07:37 AM
  #17  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Arado 234's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2013
Posts: 1,764
Exclamation

Originally Posted by Al Czervik View Post
Looking for something to guard?
That's what 121.5MHz is for! Duh!
Arado 234 is offline  
Old 03-03-2018, 02:08 PM
  #18  
Gets Weekends Off
 
TQ Nola's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2010
Position: 787 FO
Posts: 253
Default

Originally Posted by Sliceback View Post

But Airbus has a side stick and Boeing can’t admit someone has a better mouse trap.
As some bard on this very website said years ago, I'd fly an intergalactic garbage scow if the pay was right.

I have zero rat's a----s left to give over whether there's a yoke or not
TQ Nola is offline  
Old 03-08-2018, 04:11 AM
  #19  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2014
Posts: 1,681
Default

Originally Posted by TQ Nola View Post
As some bard on this very website said years ago, I'd fly an intergalactic garbage scow if the pay was right.

I have zero rat's a----s left to give over whether there's a yoke or not
Ditto.

Filler
jcountry is offline  
Old 03-08-2018, 07:20 AM
  #20  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2011
Posts: 420
Default

Why are moving auto throttles better?
DarinFred is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
EWR73FO
Major
32
02-25-2013 04:46 PM
David Watts
United
12
12-11-2010 07:21 AM
georgetg
Major
0
12-11-2008 01:09 PM
ToiletDuck
Hangar Talk
1
04-04-2007 06:39 AM
RockBottom
Major
0
06-04-2005 08:06 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices