787
#21
Are we there yet??!!
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 2,010
Likes: 0
#22
Line Holder
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,576
Likes: 20
In a year of flying the 737 and almost four in the bus, The Boeing did just that way more often than the Bus. In my experience, the bus has the power where it needs to be petty much all the time. The damn 737 needed my (admittedly slight) input.
#23
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 420
Likes: 0
#24
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 6,418
Likes: 120
From: Window seat
That’s funny. Which is why the AB has no stabilized power requirement?
400’ - idle. 100’ - idle . Start of flare - power advances to more than approach power... All dealing with the typical updrafts on a Florida day.
Or the up, back, up, back, power changes on the entire approach.
Automation is great but it has its limitations.
400’ - idle. 100’ - idle . Start of flare - power advances to more than approach power... All dealing with the typical updrafts on a Florida day.
Or the up, back, up, back, power changes on the entire approach.
Automation is great but it has its limitations.
#27
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 5,299
Likes: 0
From: A320 Capt
But, as you said, in the real world ground speed mini sometimes has thrust constantly reducing.
To guys who never turn the autothrust off, try it with a flaps 3 landing. You'll see how little thrust is carried. The book says consider full for tailwind landings, I think it should say approaches or landings.
#28
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 5,299
Likes: 0
From: A320 Capt
Yes, the wording is "At stabilized thrust (spoiled)"
But, as you said, in the real world ground speed mini sometimes has thrust constantly reducing.
To guys who never turn the autothrust off, try it with a flaps 3 landing. You'll see how little thrust is carried. The book says consider full for tailwind landings, I think it should say approaches or landings.
But, as you said, in the real world ground speed mini sometimes has thrust constantly reducing.
To guys who never turn the autothrust off, try it with a flaps 3 landing. You'll see how little thrust is carried. The book says consider full for tailwind landings, I think it should say approaches or landings.
#29
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 6,418
Likes: 120
From: Window seat
Same verbiage as the Boeing fleets. Right from the Advisory Circular. But on the Boeing you can prevent the throttles from making large thrust reductions. On the AB the schoolhouse answer was to just let the auto thrust do it's thing. Riding the jumpseat I've seen it go to idle, after previouslymaking large thrust reductions, because it got tired of being 8 kts fast due to summer thermals into MIA.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



