Search

Notices

What am I doing wrong?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-30-2018 | 09:20 AM
  #71  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 159
Likes: 0
Default

cactusmike,
That is what I said earlier. These people who are pushing this PC BS and talking about white privalidge are part of the problem not the solution. By hiring someone because of there status and not because of their excellent qualfications, you are downgrading the safety of this airline. This is an unforgiving business and it doesnt matter what race, religion or who you sleep with. If you are good enough to do this job then you should be in this profession.

A simple question to ask yourself is, would you allow your family to fly with this person in the cockpit? That is the most important question and the answer should be yes. If not, then they dont need to be upfront. I have flown with all types and don't care about who it is as long as they are safe and fun to be with for 3-4 fours days on the road.
Old 04-30-2018 | 09:38 AM
  #72  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2015
Posts: 135
Likes: 0
Default

You all are missing the point. Nobody is saying you need to be a minority to get hired as an AA pilot. The overwhelming majority of our new hires are straight, white, men.

American Airlines wants to see that you support diversity and inclusion because you’re going to be working with people from all walks of life. Not just in the cockpit, but with all different types of coworkers and customers. We don’t want people that are going to bring their bias and prejudice into the workplace.

You may not personally agree with this, but this is the official philosophy of the airline. It may not matter to you, but it is important to many of the people who work here, myself included.

Btw, you should be prepared to talk about what diversity and inclusion means to you, should you ever be fortunate enough to get an interview. I was asked in two different ways when I interviewed in 2016.
Old 04-30-2018 | 08:32 PM
  #73  
GHOST's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 90
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by A330FoodCritic
You are average hour wise, not 121, and haven't had a significant training event in the last five years but it's your white skin that's holding you back, got it.
Exactly. I love how white males feel they are being discriminated against whenever a minority gets hired. 90% of our pilots look the same and have similar qualifications. However when a minority gets hired with the same credentials - somehow "they" didn’t deserve it, or had an advantage. When 10% is too much.

Last edited by GHOST; 04-30-2018 at 08:45 PM.
Old 04-30-2018 | 09:43 PM
  #74  
Line Holder
 
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 58
Likes: 0
Default

As usual with these kinds of threads...a lot of people telling on themselves.

If you can't get hired in a profession that's 90%+ white male, it's not the minorities...it's you. Reflect.
Old 05-01-2018 | 05:03 AM
  #75  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 6,430
Likes: 124
From: Window seat
Default

The hiring group population isn’t 90% white male. Close to 80-85% but still overwhelmingly white male.

The question is does the percentage of any group getting hired equal the same percentage of that group’s share of the overall hiring pool. Ignoring military/civilian how many different sub groups are there? Four to five major groups? The company has stated, for at least one year, that they hired twice as many out of one group. That doesn’t happen randomly so to some extent target hiring was, and might still be, part of the process.

With the largest group being white males doubling a small sub group’s hiring resulted in approx 10% less white males getting hired.

Some would argue that “it’s only 10%” but the 10% that got discriminated against, for their gender and skin color, probably don’t feel that way.

Last edited by Sliceback; 05-01-2018 at 05:03 AM. Reason: Added word
Old 05-01-2018 | 05:51 AM
  #76  
GHOST's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 90
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Sliceback
The hiring group population isn’t 90% white male. Close to 80-85% but still overwhelmingly white male.

The question is does the percentage of any group getting hired equal the same percentage of that group’s share of the overall hiring pool. Ignoring military/civilian how many different sub groups are there? Four to five major groups? The company has stated, for at least one year, that they hired twice as many out of one group. That doesn’t happen randomly so to some extent target hiring was, and might still be, part of the process.

With the largest group being white males doubling a small sub group’s hiring resulted in approx 10% less white males getting hired.

Some would argue that “it’s only 10%” but the 10% that got discriminated against, for their gender and skin color, probably don’t feel that way.
Again, white males are not being discriminated against. I know plenty of black, hispanic, asian, and women pilots who are highly qualified from various backgrounds who haven’t been given an opportunity to interview at a major airline. Furthermore, not one of them has complained and/or made excuses. They understand the competitive nature of the industry, and are patiently waiting for an opportunity to present itself.

In regards to target hiring, just because a company wishes to expand opportunities to other “sub groups” does not mean that they are not qualified. In years past, target hiring was only extended to members of the good ole’ boy’s club. People who looked like me were generally not part of that group if you know what I mean.

The whole notion of minorities having an easier route to the flight deck, and/or getting slots that should have gone to more qualified white males is a narrative we hear too often in this industry. I’ve heard it my whole career as others have tried to diminish what myself and others have achieved.

Respectfully
Old 05-01-2018 | 06:21 AM
  #77  
GHOST's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 90
Likes: 0
Default

Sliceback,

I find many of your post to be very informative. I used your quote to illustrate a point. Please don't take my post as an attack against you or your character.
Old 05-01-2018 | 08:03 AM
  #78  
Santini's Avatar
Thread Starter
"Better kick it, Navy."
15M Airline Miles
5 Years
100 Countries Visited
 
Joined: Apr 2018
Posts: 57
Likes: 0
From: Upright
Default

Originally Posted by A330FoodCritic
You are average hour wise, not 121, and haven't had a significant training event in the last five years but it's your white skin that's holding you back, got it.
Context is everything. I was responding to someone else who implied that I was “too male and too pale” or some such.

And I have nearly four years of 121 experience.

I really don’t care. Especially with some of the snark in this thread. You must be a dream to work with.

I make $150K a year flying as much in a year as AA flies in a month. Considering that, I’ve got it made where I’m at. If they don’t call so be it. The grass is not always greener.

Last edited by Santini; 05-01-2018 at 08:21 AM.
Old 05-01-2018 | 08:04 AM
  #79  
Santini's Avatar
Thread Starter
"Better kick it, Navy."
15M Airline Miles
5 Years
100 Countries Visited
 
Joined: Apr 2018
Posts: 57
Likes: 0
From: Upright
Default

Originally Posted by Name User
US Airways had that requirement mostly because of all the issues they were having with long time FOs who were burnt out not being able to pass training events/upgrades. No idea if AA has it.

It's funny looking back but getting downgraded was the best thing that ever happened to me because it gave me another recent training event that put me through on their selection criteria. Meanwhile a lot of guys just senior to me who never got downgraded were still at my regional years later. Kinda funny how it all seems to work out.
So my 135 rides don’t count as a training event?
Old 05-01-2018 | 08:06 AM
  #80  
Santini's Avatar
Thread Starter
"Better kick it, Navy."
15M Airline Miles
5 Years
100 Countries Visited
 
Joined: Apr 2018
Posts: 57
Likes: 0
From: Upright
Default

Originally Posted by Cheddar
As for the OP, I don’t think the passengers care much who is in the front of the bus - as long as they are competent and good at their jobs.

Sorry man, but in the US skin color/gender shouldn’t matter with the competence bias at major airlines. To get to this point, the training and experience level is higher than almost anywhere else in the world. There are always exceptions and I definitely think we all have our 2% rule, but your experience with getting on at a legacy should prove the point.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I agree with you completely. Skin color should be a non-factor. I’d say most of us live our lives colorblind, but reverse racism seems to get a pass. Seems. Maybe it’s a myth.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
vagabond
Safety
22
10-08-2014 08:07 PM
steamgauge
Cargo
159
04-11-2012 12:42 PM
ShyGuy
Regional
272
01-03-2012 04:15 PM
N271FE
Cargo
36
12-27-2011 06:54 PM
floridaCFII
Flight Schools and Training
29
05-09-2009 10:29 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices