C Series Order
#51
#52
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2014
Posts: 3,097
Anything under 1000nm and the 195-E2 is actually a more efficient airplane vs the C series on total trip costs. It would be perfect for all our regional (but larger market) routes out of DFW since it is fairly centrally located to those markets, and with not very many sales maybe they are looking to deal.
I remember all the crying guys were doing with the Group I rates thinking we'd replace our Group II aircraft with hundreds of them.
Delta's advantage is they paid almost nothing for their C series but were rumored to owe Bombardier a royalty anytime the aircraft is operated over 1000nm.
Also the C series is a much nicer aircraft inside with a better passenger experience (the E190 product feels much more cramped and regional-ish). It's a nice airplane and Delta certainly made the right call especially at their price point. What a deal. It's incredible how their management always hits home runs.
I remember all the crying guys were doing with the Group I rates thinking we'd replace our Group II aircraft with hundreds of them.
Delta's advantage is they paid almost nothing for their C series but were rumored to owe Bombardier a royalty anytime the aircraft is operated over 1000nm.
Also the C series is a much nicer aircraft inside with a better passenger experience (the E190 product feels much more cramped and regional-ish). It's a nice airplane and Delta certainly made the right call especially at their price point. What a deal. It's incredible how their management always hits home runs.
Last edited by Name User; 07-07-2018 at 01:06 PM.
#53
#54
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: Window seat
Posts: 5,219
CS 100 is five abreast(seatguru.com). 20% of the seats are middle seats.
The E series I've been on are four across. Zero middle seats. I'd take that over any five or six abreast n/b.
If the E-190v2 is more efficient under 1000 nm I hope we buy a bunch of them.
The E series I've been on are four across. Zero middle seats. I'd take that over any five or six abreast n/b.
If the E-190v2 is more efficient under 1000 nm I hope we buy a bunch of them.
#56
Everyone needs to email their reps and the NC about Group 1 rates. It’s very important in this contract, because like em not (and I’m with Sliceback, hope we buy a ton) they are in our future. Group 1 Capt should pay more than Group 2 FO. Group 1 FO shouldn’t pay year 1 rates during your second year...
#57
I predict with the upcoming wave of retirements, PAX that fly on most of the 76 seat RJs will be on the CS100 (or the like) flown by Group I mainline. That will be a huge bunch of Group I flying.
PAX that fly on a majority of the 50 seat RJs will be on the 76 seat RJs with less frequency. Only very thin routes will still fly 50 seat RJs.
The regionals will shrink and consolidate. In a few years they will look like a skeleton of what they are today.
That is what my crystal ball says (which has a track record of being pretty accurate).
PAX that fly on a majority of the 50 seat RJs will be on the 76 seat RJs with less frequency. Only very thin routes will still fly 50 seat RJs.
The regionals will shrink and consolidate. In a few years they will look like a skeleton of what they are today.
That is what my crystal ball says (which has a track record of being pretty accurate).
#58
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jan 2015
Posts: 398
Of course, I'm sure we will keep right in calling out normal indicatins on approach, like "Stable" and perfectly normal Speed/Sink Rates.
And who's idea was it ever to call out "4 lights"?
That has never been in the book.
#59
#60
Everyone needs to email their reps and the NC about Group 1 rates. It’s very important in this contract, because like em not (and I’m with Sliceback, hope we buy a ton) they are in our future. Group 1 Capt should pay more than Group 2 FO. Group 1 FO shouldn’t pay year 1 rates during your second year...
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post