Search
Notices

C Series Order

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-07-2018, 12:14 PM
  #51  
You scratched my anchor
 
Al Czervik's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2011
Posts: 4,878
Default

Originally Posted by Theaveragejoker View Post
Anyone have a clue how this Boeing/Embraer deal could influence the S80/190 replacements?
We will phase out the SUPER DUPER 80. We will get C Series and operated them procedurally exactly like the 80.
Al Czervik is offline  
Old 07-07-2018, 12:50 PM
  #52  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2014
Posts: 3,097
Default

Anything under 1000nm and the 195-E2 is actually a more efficient airplane vs the C series on total trip costs. It would be perfect for all our regional (but larger market) routes out of DFW since it is fairly centrally located to those markets, and with not very many sales maybe they are looking to deal.

I remember all the crying guys were doing with the Group I rates thinking we'd replace our Group II aircraft with hundreds of them.

Delta's advantage is they paid almost nothing for their C series but were rumored to owe Bombardier a royalty anytime the aircraft is operated over 1000nm.

Also the C series is a much nicer aircraft inside with a better passenger experience (the E190 product feels much more cramped and regional-ish). It's a nice airplane and Delta certainly made the right call especially at their price point. What a deal. It's incredible how their management always hits home runs.

Last edited by Name User; 07-07-2018 at 01:06 PM.
Name User is offline  
Old 07-07-2018, 05:12 PM
  #53  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Arado 234's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2013
Posts: 1,764
Default

Originally Posted by Al Czervik View Post
We will phase out the SUPER DUPER 80. We will get C Series and operated them procedurally exactly like the 80.
Please lead by example with an upward swinging hand motion to indicate the gear retraction.
Arado 234 is offline  
Old 07-07-2018, 05:25 PM
  #54  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: Window seat
Posts: 5,219
Default

CS 100 is five abreast(seatguru.com). 20% of the seats are middle seats.

The E series I've been on are four across. Zero middle seats. I'd take that over any five or six abreast n/b.

If the E-190v2 is more efficient under 1000 nm I hope we buy a bunch of them.
Sliceback is offline  
Old 07-07-2018, 05:40 PM
  #55  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Arado 234's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2013
Posts: 1,764
Default

Originally Posted by Sliceback View Post

If the E-190v2 is more efficient under 1000 nm I hope we buy a bunch of them.
Tell APA to negotiate a better pay scale for G1 aircraft.
Arado 234 is offline  
Old 07-07-2018, 06:58 PM
  #56  
Gets Weekends Off
 
PRS Guitars's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2013
Position: A320 CA
Posts: 2,297
Default

Originally Posted by Arado 234 View Post
Tell APA to negotiate a better pay scale for G1 aircraft.
Everyone needs to email their reps and the NC about Group 1 rates. It’s very important in this contract, because like em not (and I’m with Sliceback, hope we buy a ton) they are in our future. Group 1 Capt should pay more than Group 2 FO. Group 1 FO shouldn’t pay year 1 rates during your second year...
PRS Guitars is offline  
Old 07-07-2018, 07:23 PM
  #57  
Gets Everyday Off
 
TransWorld's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2016
Position: Relaxed
Posts: 6,949
Default

I predict with the upcoming wave of retirements, PAX that fly on most of the 76 seat RJs will be on the CS100 (or the like) flown by Group I mainline. That will be a huge bunch of Group I flying.

PAX that fly on a majority of the 50 seat RJs will be on the 76 seat RJs with less frequency. Only very thin routes will still fly 50 seat RJs.

The regionals will shrink and consolidate. In a few years they will look like a skeleton of what they are today.

That is what my crystal ball says (which has a track record of being pretty accurate).
TransWorld is offline  
Old 07-08-2018, 04:34 AM
  #58  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2015
Posts: 398
Default

Originally Posted by Arado 234 View Post
Please lead by example with an upward swinging hand motion to indicate the gear retraction.
They took that out quite a while back ago.

Of course, I'm sure we will keep right in calling out normal indicatins on approach, like "Stable" and perfectly normal Speed/Sink Rates.

And who's idea was it ever to call out "4 lights"?
That has never been in the book.
Frip is offline  
Old 07-08-2018, 06:16 AM
  #59  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Arado 234's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2013
Posts: 1,764
Default

Originally Posted by Frip View Post

Of course, I'm sure we will keep right in calling out normal indicatins on approach, like "Stable" and perfectly normal Speed/Sink Rate.
The "Stable" call on approach is pretty much a standard amongst operators.
Arado 234 is offline  
Old 07-08-2018, 06:21 AM
  #60  
Unfaithfully yours, Hank
 
MarineGrunt's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Position: All
Posts: 222
Default

Originally Posted by PRS Guitars View Post
Everyone needs to email their reps and the NC about Group 1 rates. It’s very important in this contract, because like em not (and I’m with Sliceback, hope we buy a ton) they are in our future. Group 1 Capt should pay more than Group 2 FO. Group 1 FO shouldn’t pay year 1 rates during your second year...
Should pay more than G4 FO in my opinion. It’s a legacy airline captain position. It should pay like one.
MarineGrunt is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Guard Dude
Delta
201720
04-06-2022 06:59 AM
scambo1
Delta
262
04-28-2016 05:38 AM
CLazarus
United
7
04-17-2016 02:20 AM
jsled
Major
37
12-23-2009 03:42 PM
WatchThis!
Major
8
04-01-2006 08:57 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices