![]() |
Originally Posted by stillcantfly
(Post 2922687)
I hope you don’t get rid of it.. I’ve been in the regionals for 12 years left seat for 7 years now. I have no degree and therefore can’t get hired. Left my previous regional for said flow. Looking like 7 years till I flow as of now. No failed check rides no violations. No accidents nothing!, not even a speeding ticket
.........................Don’t know what the secret is to getting hired.................. You can do it online and you don't even have to learn anything useful if you don't want to. |
Originally Posted by Andrew_VT
(Post 2922851)
You can do it online and you don't even have to learn anything useful if you don't want to.
|
Originally Posted by Surprise
(Post 2923025)
I attended a real brick and mortar university in person and I still didn’t learn anything useful. :D
|
Originally Posted by Surprise
(Post 2923025)
I attended a real brick and mortar university in person and I still didn’t learn anything useful. :D
|
Originally Posted by SonicFlyer
(Post 2922646)
As I have said for a while, the 1500 hour rule has made us less safe.
|
Originally Posted by Surprise
(Post 2923025)
I attended a real brick and mortar university in person and I still didn’t learn anything useful. :D
|
Originally Posted by A330FoodCritic
(Post 2919933)
I just thought, what kinda company makes people go to class on Thanksgiving? Friends in other industries cannot believe it. I was brand new, three days out of the military when I started at Eagle.
|
Flowing in a few months. I have 10,000 hrs 121, over 4,000 PIC, and LCA. I'd say the flows have just as much if not more experience than the average Delta or United civilian new hire. Some us of waited to flow to AA instead going somewhere else. Hasn't Delta hired quite a few non-military pilots without any 121 PIC time? You at least have to be a captain (as of now) to flow to AA.
|
Originally Posted by Dunkin
(Post 2924922)
Flowing in a few months. I have 10,000 hrs 121, over 4,000 PIC, and LCA. I'd say the flows have just as much if not more experience than the average Delta or United civilian new hire. Some us of waited to flow to AA instead going somewhere else. Hasn't Delta hired quite a few non-military pilots without any 121 PIC time? You at least have to be a captain (as of now) to flow to AA.
|
Originally Posted by Pilot X
(Post 2925020)
You’ve got more time than me and I’ve been here 12 years haha
|
Originally Posted by FlyyGuyy
(Post 2925024)
I didn't have that kind of time when I came over. 5k tt 3.5k 121pic. From PSA/pdt that's probably a closer guess
|
Originally Posted by FlyyGuyy
(Post 2925024)
I didn't have that kind of time when I came over. 5k tt 3.5k 121pic. From PSA/pdt that's probably a closer guess
I'm sure there are others. |
Originally Posted by Varsity
(Post 2925047)
The Envoy flows are probably higher time. One I know flowed earlier this year with 22,000 hours. Good guy and great pilot.
I'm sure there are others. The hardest thing to learn has been the AA way of doing things like Dallas and ORD. I seriously doubt there's people coming over via the flow with very little experience. |
I’ll have over 6,000 total and almost 3,000 TPIC when I flow. I’d say most flows are well-qualified.
|
Originally Posted by Mesabah
(Post 2919871)
You act as though AA has no way to get rid of an undesirable pilot. Pilot's get fired all the time, hell, Delta has fired many 9E SSP folks, and they only take ~60% of 9E pilots that apply. If Endeavor had a flow, I wouldn't be making over $150K here.
|
Originally Posted by sailingfun
(Post 2925507)
Delta has fired many 9E pilots? Can you put a number on that. My understanding is 3 total.
1 : one 2 : more 3 : lots .... 4 : profit |
Kind of enjoy the other side of the scale as well. One of the 190 forced upgrades was the #1 fo at regional. loved the schedule and didn’t need the money. he had 0 121TPIC as is a mainline capt. I only had logged 19 hours my last 24 months at regional. Another guy who was hired into the training dept at regional tried to be the lowest hourly pilot at AA. unfortunately, he was beat out by some mil guys. but as far as 121 time I think he was low at less than 3k. not bad for a flow. Goal is work as little as possible right? Way I looked at it is there are no ASAPs in sim world. I was master level at TEM.
|
Originally Posted by Battlinbear
(Post 2925650)
Way I looked at it is there are no ASAPs in sim world. I was master level at TEM.
|
Originally Posted by chrisreedrules
(Post 2925471)
I’ll have over 6,000 total and almost 3,000 TPIC when I flow. I’d say most flows are well-qualified.
|
Originally Posted by ZeroTT
(Post 2925765)
I don’t think the knock is against their stats. It’s the “I can’t make it to the majors the normal way” enriched hiring pool and “i can make it to the majors the normal way” depleted flow stream that people object to
I can't speak for PSA or Piedmont flows, but I do know Envoy is quick to fire just about anyone for anything. |
Originally Posted by Varsity
(Post 2925785)
Do you have specific examples?
I can't speak for PSA or Piedmont flows, but I do know Envoy is quick to fire just about anyone for anything. |
Originally Posted by FlyyGuyy
(Post 2925823)
PSA has been on a roll for firing people and putting letters in v files for years. That being said I don't know about most people but I busted my ass to get hired at FedEx, United, Delta and to a lesser extent UPS. Nobody called before I flowed. That's just the way the cookie crumbled, I'm sure there's folks who aren't trying to get hired though.
|
This isn’t a knock against anyone who flows.
But how many people flow after being hired by another major? There are two possibilities here 1) the WO folks hired by DL UA SW etc are a randomly selected group indistinguishable from those who aren’t hired 2) that group is above average. Leaving behind a group that’s below average. |
Originally Posted by ZeroTT
(Post 2926066)
This isn’t a knock against anyone who flows.
But how many people flow after being hired by another major? There are two possibilities here 1) the WO folks hired by DL UA SW etc are a randomly selected group indistinguishable from those who aren’t hired 2) that group is above average. Leaving behind a group that’s below average. |
As an Envoy flow I can tell you that a lot of guys I spoke with the last couple years have been waiting for AA, mainly for the retirement numbers and given the average age of a new hire at AA was high 30s/low 40s compared with the fact that both UA and DL have already hired 5000ish guys in 7 years with a much lower average age...much better movement plus DFW for those that want it.
As far as the bottom half of the list, those guys we’re asking how to get picked up at any major quickest. |
Sounds like a few people are trying desperately to pretend that raw milk put through a cream separator will yield half and half from both spigots.
That isn’t my experience. |
I've been very critical of those that simply depend on flow to get them to a major.
That said, if you need a regional to get PIC to make your apps competitive, by the time you are competitive, you're pretty close to flowing. If AA is your preferred destination, at the point you're close to flowing, you probably aren't trying to get hired by Delta, United, FedEx, UPS, Southwest and you sure as hell are not trying to get hired by Agilent, Frontier, Sun Country, etc. There are a LOT of people I've flown with that fit that description. But to the point of the thread, there are quite few I've flown with that would never get hired at a legacy without the flow (no degree being the biggest thing)... I think most of those would still land at a major though if it weren't for flow given the future retirement situation. |
I don’t think it would hurt to have a barrier or two added to the flow. Like a training record review or a look at a personnel file. Probably way past time to go back and change that process...
Anyway, toward the end of my stint on the 190 a captain told me the following story: He had been hired by Airways from Mesaba. When he was at Mesaba a captain there had been, allegedly, drugging and sexually assaulting flight attendants. Crazy story today, back then he was allowed to resign. Fast forward to this 190 CA showing up at the CLT training center for an R9 and guess who’s strolling around... the guy now works for PSA and gets to walk in the door at AA. The flow serves its purpose in many ways. It alleviates the pressure on HR to interview and hire an enormous amount of pilots and acts as a recruiting tool for the wholly owned regionals. If it was causing a giant headache for AA they would change it. |
Originally Posted by AverageCoffee
(Post 2926221)
I don’t think it would hurt to have a barrier or two added to the flow. Like a training record review or a look at a personnel file. Probably way past time to go back and change that process...
Anyway, toward the end of my stint on the 190 a captain told me the following story: He had been hired by Airways from Mesaba. When he was at Mesaba a captain there had been, allegedly, drugging and sexually assaulting flight attendants. Crazy story today, back then he was allowed to resign. Fast forward to this 190 CA showing up at the CLT training center for an R9 and guess who’s strolling around... the guy now works for PSA and gets to walk in the door at AA. The flow serves its purpose in many ways. It alleviates the pressure on HR to interview and hire an enormous amount of pilots and acts as a recruiting tool for the wholly owned regionals. If it was causing a giant headache for AA they would change it. In regards to the PSA flow, AA has always been able refuse people. To my knowledge they haven't exercised that ability yet. |
Many of you are acting as if getting hired instead of flowing has any bearing on whether or not a pilot will be a desirable person to work with. And many of you are insinuating that a person who chooses to flow to AA rather than go somewhere else is a less desirable employee. That’s absurd.
Sure there will always be a few bad apples. But plenty of pilots hired at AA, UA, and Delta outside of the flow and interview agreements have been bad apple employees. It’s just the way it is. |
Originally Posted by AverageCoffee
(Post 2926221)
I don’t think it would hurt to have a barrier or two added to the flow. Like a training record review or a look at a personnel file. Probably way past time to go back and change that process...
Anyway, toward the end of my stint on the 190 a captain told me the following story: He had been hired by Airways from Mesaba. When he was at Mesaba a captain there had been, allegedly, drugging and sexually assaulting flight attendants. Crazy story today, back then he was allowed to resign. Fast forward to this 190 CA showing up at the CLT training center for an R9 and guess who’s strolling around... the guy now works for PSA and gets to walk in the door at AA. The flow serves its purpose in many ways. It alleviates the pressure on HR to interview and hire an enormous amount of pilots and acts as a recruiting tool for the wholly owned regionals. If it was causing a giant headache for AA they would change it. There were people hired at Airways in the 80's/90's who would not get hired under Envoy's standards today. One current 777 F/O I know of specifically with an egregious accident/incident record. It's also important to remember this isn't yesterdays AMR. Even off the street AA's interview is by far the easiest amongst the Big 3, and easier than Southwest/Fedex. It's like a 90% acceptance rate. Higher than Envoy/PSA/PDT if we're being honest. |
Originally Posted by AverageCoffee
(Post 2926221)
I don’t think it would hurt to have a barrier or two added to the flow. Like a training record review or a look at a personnel file. Probably way past time to go back and change that process...
|
Originally Posted by Excargodog
(Post 2926157)
Sounds like a few people are trying desperately to pretend that raw milk put through a cream separator will yield half and half from both spigots.
That isn’t my experience. |
Originally Posted by Varsity
(Post 2926313)
It's also important to remember this isn't yesterdays AMR. Even off the street AA's interview is by far the easiest amongst the Big 3, and easier than Southwest/Fedex. It's like a 90% acceptance rate. Higher than Envoy/PSA/PDT if we're being honest.
|
Originally Posted by Bluetaildragger
(Post 2926403)
It’s very hard just to get an interview at AA. That’s the big hurdle here, compared to UAL and DAL. They only call you in if they believe they want you to be a pilot here. The high acceptance rate doesn’t make it comparable to a regional by any means whatsoever. That’s an absurd analogy.
|
Originally Posted by Varsity
(Post 2926431)
AA is interviewing the same candidates as DL/UA/FX and has by far the highest acceptance rate. What's absurd about that?
I'd say AA has a pretty good feel of a candidate before they step foot into the interview, more so than some other carriers. If they had both of those processes in place, and had a high interview failure rate, that would indicate a problem with the process, not the candidates. The whole point of pre-screening these days in all different industries is to not waste your time interviewing someone who you're going to just end up turning down. If you have a high pass rate and the person being hired ends up being who you're looking for, what's the problem with the process? |
Originally Posted by Varsity
(Post 2926431)
AA is interviewing the same candidates as DL/UA/FX and has by far the highest acceptance rate. What's absurd about that?
|
Originally Posted by Varsity
(Post 2926313)
Again, Can't speak for PSA or PDT, but Envoy has some of the strictest hiring standards amongst regionals right now.
And I believe it. The 1500 hour rule hit the regional airlines hard and qualified candidates were hard to come by. FOs were taking 80 hours to complete OE and even then the regular line captains were left to teach... A LOT. Anyway. Happy to hear it has gotten better (at least at Envoy) Jumping back... if AA had a problem, they would change it. If the rumor of 10+ probationary pilots being fired last year is true, then the bad apples make themselves known and the current system works just fine. |
Originally Posted by Varsity
(Post 2926431)
AA is interviewing the same candidates as DL/UA/FX and has by far the highest acceptance rate. What's absurd about that?
|
Originally Posted by ZeroTT
(Post 2925765)
I don’t think the knock is against their stats. It’s the “I can’t make it to the majors the normal way” enriched hiring pool and “i can make it to the majors the normal way” depleted flow stream that people object to
Your Daddy at mainline finances your college/flight training. He walks your resume into the CP office and at 2000 hours your “hired”. (And by YOU I mean a Son/daughter of an Airline Pilot) Vs A regular guy off the street. Flys 10,000 hours all over the northeast. Doesn’t have the golden ladder available to him. Waits his 10-14 years to flow. Now he gets to fly all over the northeast. But at a Mainline pay scale. People are people. I’d like to think once you get to the mainline level everyone has the equal amount of talent to fly a jet from A to B. There were people hired outside the flow that were, well let’s say, on thin ice before. The flow allows people to be put into a group. Then the group analyzed. Then segregation. Then Generalizations. Just as this thread has become. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:53 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands