Jumpseat Battle Brewing
#181
#182
Not sure I follow - I’m just saying that captains at AA and (im almost positive) it’s WOs don’t have a say in who goes through the door. You could turn someone down coming into the cockpit but that’s really where the authority ends. No RAH iPad app is going to change that for many reasons. We’re probably on the same page here
#183
At what point does YX finally get kicked in the teeth for what they are pulling with the jumpseat? https://youtu.be/6vndXYjXePM
#184
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Aug 2019
Posts: 420
At what point does YX finally get kicked in the teeth for what they are pulling with the jumpseat? https://youtu.be/6vndXYjXePM
#185
Seems to me that it is mostly only Envoy guys who seem to have a problem with this and are at the forefront of spreading misinformation on it. Where on the doll did the Republic pilot hurt you? When you flow to AA in 10 years will you be denying RPA pilots on your jumpseat?
#186
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2011
Position: ERJ 170
Posts: 729
Sent from my LE2127 using Tapatalk
#187
Seems to me that it is mostly only Envoy guys who seem to have a problem with this and are at the forefront of spreading misinformation on it. Where on the doll did the Republic pilot hurt you? When you flow to AA in 10 years will you be denying RPA pilots on your jumpseat?
Actions have consequences.
#188
It boils down to the fact that your company cannot isolate the scheduling of their pilots to where they fly for one specific carrier. Why should a EWR based pilot who flies almost exclusively for United receive an enhanced benefit on American? They shouldn't. And until YX can isolate their bases to where only bases X-Y-Z fly for AA, there should not be any change. Do you want flow next? It's not my problem if it costs YX more money or interrupts their business model. You’re a FFDC, build it into your next CPA with AA. Your company signed and agreement and now you're trying to whine yourselves into a better one.
Actions have consequences.
Actions have consequences.
#189
It boils down to the fact that your company cannot isolate the scheduling of their pilots to where they fly for one specific carrier. Why should a EWR based pilot who flies almost exclusively for United receive an enhanced benefit on American? They shouldn't. And until YX can isolate their bases to where only bases X-Y-Z fly for AA, there should not be any change. Do you want flow next? It's not my problem if it costs YX more money or interrupts their business model. You’re a FFDC, build it into your next CPA with AA. Your company signed and agreement and now you're trying to whine yourselves into a better one.
Actions have consequences.
Actions have consequences.
#190
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jun 2014
Posts: 589
It boils down to the fact that your company cannot isolate the scheduling of their pilots to where they fly for one specific carrier. Why should a EWR based pilot who flies almost exclusively for United receive an enhanced benefit on American? They shouldn't. And until YX can isolate their bases to where only bases X-Y-Z fly for AA, there should not be any change. Do you want flow next? It's not my problem if it costs YX more money or interrupts their business model. You’re a FFDC, build it into your next CPA with AA. Your company signed and agreement and now you're trying to whine yourselves into a better one.
Actions have consequences.
Actions have consequences.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post