Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > American
AA Regional LCAs Make More than AA 777 CAs >

AA Regional LCAs Make More than AA 777 CAs

Search
Notices

AA Regional LCAs Make More than AA 777 CAs

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-16-2022, 12:59 PM
  #151  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: May 2015
Position: Bus drivins’ harder on ur head than on ur feet
Posts: 94
Default

Originally Posted by at6d View Post
I have an idea. How about merging the wholly owned carriers together to make one big Eagle. Then, figure out who wants to go to AA. Those guys will be called “flow through” pilots. The other guys will be “Eagle Rights” pilots. Once a pilot makes RJ captain they serve a two year seat lock, but they are assigned a seniority number. When they flow, they start with two years seniority.

APA will get a benefit, too! In the event of a furlough, take the number of flow through pilots and subtract that from the Rights pilots and you get the number of APA flow back seats for furloughed pilots. Left seat of course!

In exchange, the company gets a long term no-strike amenable contract!

It’s a win/win/win!

I see what you did there.

It all worked out great before.
riel39 is offline  
Old 06-16-2022, 01:45 PM
  #152  
In a land of unicorns
 
Joined APC: Apr 2014
Position: Whale FO
Posts: 6,482
Default

Originally Posted by at6d View Post
I have an idea. How about merging the wholly owned carriers together to make one big Eagle. Then, figure out who wants to go to AA. Those guys will be called “flow through” pilots. The other guys will be “Eagle Rights” pilots. Once a pilot makes RJ captain they serve a two year seat lock, but they are assigned a seniority number. When they flow, they start with two years seniority.

APA will get a benefit, too! In the event of a furlough, take the number of flow through pilots and subtract that from the Rights pilots and you get the number of APA flow back seats for furloughed pilots. Left seat of course!

In exchange, the company gets a long term no-strike amenable contract!

It’s a win/win/win!
Lets just arbitrarily decide a number too on how many would flow back. How does 824 sound to you?
dera is offline  
Old 06-16-2022, 03:07 PM
  #153  
Strike averted!
 
at6d's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2015
Position: B737
Posts: 3,657
Default

What about the 824!? A number I was very familiar with circa 2007.
at6d is offline  
Old 06-16-2022, 03:16 PM
  #154  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Tranquility's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2014
Position: Da Bus, Left
Posts: 1,512
Default

Originally Posted by at6d View Post
I have an idea. How about merging the wholly owned carriers together to make one big Eagle. Then, figure out who wants to go to AA. Those guys will be called “flow through” pilots. The other guys will be “Eagle Rights” pilots. Once a pilot makes RJ captain they serve a two year seat lock, but they are assigned a seniority number. When they flow, they start with two years seniority.

APA will get a benefit, too! In the event of a furlough, take the number of flow through pilots and subtract that from the Rights pilots and you get the number of APA flow back seats for furloughed pilots. Left seat of course!

In exchange, the company gets a long term no-strike amenable contract!

It’s a win/win/win!
Only if I get to fly with TWA peeps... The nAAtives were a bit off when this happened last time....
And, you forgot to add that your proposed Eagle Rights pilots could eventually flow, even though they never lost their Captain seat....

Last edited by Tranquility; 06-16-2022 at 03:27 PM.
Tranquility is offline  
Old 06-16-2022, 04:05 PM
  #155  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jul 2021
Posts: 136
Default

Originally Posted by CRJphlyer View Post
I’m actually not sure if you’re serious or just trolling. Because your point doesn’t make sense. Bringing ALL flying in house should be the goal. 1 brand. 1 airline. 1 seniority list.
Who’s going to go to the mainline that starts them off in the E145? It doesn’t make any business sense.
RadialRover is offline  
Old 06-16-2022, 04:25 PM
  #156  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2015
Position: Gear slinger
Posts: 2,909
Default

Originally Posted by RadialRover View Post
Who’s going to go to the mainline that starts them off in the E145? It doesn’t make any business sense.
$90/hr is in line with the rest of the fleets for first year pay at AA.
Otterbox is offline  
Old 06-16-2022, 05:24 PM
  #157  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Sep 2015
Posts: 109
Default

Originally Posted by J3nkums View Post
It doesn't benefit mainline because this temporary contract gain is not going to last. Nothing strange or obtuse about the pilot group. What's strange is the idea that just because you're WO you think you're entitled to a number at AA when half the pilot group comes from somewhere else... to include other regionals where they do their time and leave for the next step in their career. That to me is obtuse, strange and has an odd sense of entitlement to it. While I'm not against bringing our WOs in house it would have to be done in a way where thousands of pilots don't arent mainline over night and new hires from outside the WO would be able to bid for a seat in the RJ like we had it when we had 190s in house. Otherwise, there would be no reason for any competitive candidate from the military or anywhere else to choose AA because lets be honest, right now short of living in base for AA, there's not much going for it currently except the seniority progression.
The benefit IS the absorption of YOUR flying. If this is how you APA fellas think… GOOD LUCK!
CRJphlyer is offline  
Old 06-16-2022, 05:34 PM
  #158  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Sep 2015
Posts: 109
Default

Originally Posted by RadialRover View Post
Who’s going to go to the mainline that starts them off in the E145? It doesn’t make any business sense.
1,500 hour CFIs and anyone who wants to fly passengers in a 77 or 78 eventually. You do realize that the industry is moving that direction right? This pay at the Eagle WOs just hastened that.

Delta has already pretty much absorbed it’s regional flying already with 717s and to a certain extent the A220. The pay on those aircraft is lower than on the bus and 73. United’s plan involves 737s to take up the slack from their failing regionals but if it keeps up like this it isn’t a stretch at all to see them operating 175s in a 80+ seat configuration. ACMIs and LCCs are hiring 1,500 hour pilots here and there already.

Do you think the regionals just shrink in half and nothing else changes over the next 12 months? Mainlines are going to be flying their own flying again as they resorb what they can from the regional airlines. They can’t maintain their networks with their current / future narrowbodies. The flying comes back in house or it’s just market share gone for probably good. And if the RJs come in house that means the pilots HAVE to come with them.

This is the opportunity that APA was ignorant to. The market is pushing this direction and it’s doing it fast. It isn’t about entitlement for a mainline seniority number or any garbage like that. Your numbers are yours. Have them lol. The point is that the flying will be resorbed sooner or later. And APA missed this opportunity to do it sooner and make gains for the pilots. Missed it completely.

You are all so stuck on, “BuT mUh SeNiOrItY nUmBeRs!” and “sTuPiD rJ sCuM” that you’ve completely missed the forest for the trees. But that’s nothing new for APA.
CRJphlyer is offline  
Old 06-16-2022, 06:10 PM
  #159  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jul 2021
Posts: 136
Default

Originally Posted by CRJphlyer View Post
1,500 hour CFIs and anyone who wants to fly passengers in a 77 or 78 eventually. You do realize that the industry is moving that direction right? This pay at the Eagle WOs just hastened that.

Delta has already pretty much absorbed it’s regional flying already with 717s and to a certain extent the A220. The pay on those aircraft is lower than on the bus and 73. United’s plan involves 737s to take up the slack from their failing regionals but if it keeps up like this it isn’t a stretch at all to see them operating 175s in a 80+ seat configuration. ACMIs and LCCs are hiring 1,500 hour pilots here and there already.

Do you think the regionals just shrink in half and nothing else changes over the next 12 months? Mainlines are going to be flying their own flying again as they resorb what they can from the regional airlines. They can’t maintain their networks with their current / future narrowbodies. The flying comes back in house or it’s just market share gone for probably good. And if the RJs come in house that means the pilots HAVE to come with them.

This is the opportunity that APA was ignorant to. The market is pushing this direction and it’s doing it fast. It isn’t about entitlement for a mainline seniority number or any garbage like that. Your numbers are yours. Have them lol. The point is that the flying will be resorbed sooner or later. And APA missed this opportunity to do it sooner and make gains for the pilots. Missed it completely.

You are all so stuck on, “BuT mUh SeNiOrItY nUmBeRs!” and “sTuPiD rJ sCuM” that you’ve completely missed the forest for the trees. But that’s nothing new for APA.
Seems like you’re the one stuck on the fantasy of mainline operating regional aircraft and gifting you a seniority number.
RadialRover is offline  
Old 06-16-2022, 06:44 PM
  #160  
Gets Weekends Off
 
thrust's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2010
Posts: 1,123
Default

Originally Posted by CRJphlyer View Post
1,500 hour CFIs and anyone who wants to fly passengers in a 77 or 78 eventually. You do realize that the industry is moving that direction right? This pay at the Eagle WOs just hastened that.

Delta has already pretty much absorbed it’s regional flying already with 717s and to a certain extent the A220. The pay on those aircraft is lower than on the bus and 73. United’s plan involves 737s to take up the slack from their failing regionals but if it keeps up like this it isn’t a stretch at all to see them operating 175s in a 80+ seat configuration. ACMIs and LCCs are hiring 1,500 hour pilots here and there already.

Do you think the regionals just shrink in half and nothing else changes over the next 12 months? Mainlines are going to be flying their own flying again as they resorb what they can from the regional airlines. They can’t maintain their networks with their current / future narrowbodies. The flying comes back in house or it’s just market share gone for probably good. And if the RJs come in house that means the pilots HAVE to come with them.

This is the opportunity that APA was ignorant to. The market is pushing this direction and it’s doing it fast. It isn’t about entitlement for a mainline seniority number or any garbage like that. Your numbers are yours. Have them lol. The point is that the flying will be resorbed sooner or later. And APA missed this opportunity to do it sooner and make gains for the pilots. Missed it completely.

You are all so stuck on, “BuT mUh SeNiOrItY nUmBeRs!” and “sTuPiD rJ sCuM” that you’ve completely missed the forest for the trees. But that’s nothing new for APA.
I’m open to whatever it is you’re trying to sell, but you’re gonna have to explain why I should care better than you currently are. Please be very specific with specific examples of why I should want APA to spend negotiating capital to staple the WOs to AA mainline list.

-More numbers on the list spending union dues equals more APA money? Ok. Sure
-All flying should be done by mainline pilots? Yep.
-This would pretty much decimate the non-WO applicant pool. Shouldn’t that be a concern?

What else?
thrust is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Wingbreaker
Southwest
254
03-20-2022 03:39 AM
Charlie Papa
Career Questions
6
03-29-2017 03:26 AM
MD11
Regional
138
06-26-2014 02:02 PM
dvhighdrive88
United
74
06-03-2013 07:34 AM
AFPirate
Regional
6
11-26-2007 11:39 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices