Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   American (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/american/)
-   -   Negotiation Update (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/american/139349-negotiation-update.html)

AllYourBaseAreB 09-25-2022 08:59 AM

If all WO become mainline I believe that will trigger a lot of other work groups’ scope clauses to lay claim to many out stations, not to mention FA’s, mechanics, etc. Unless, and I don’t think this exists anywhere, we have APA seniority pilots operating non-AA certificate aircraft.

ny797 09-25-2022 09:29 AM

The majority of pilots are so short sighted it’s sad. Pay rates can change with a flick of a switch, and management will have no problem doing that if they see a need for it. Just look back 5 years ago when AA unilaterally gave an 8% raise, no strings attached.

What Alaska did was focus on quality of life issues. Some are major, some minor which I think is the beauty of the agreement.

I hope it passes for the sole reason that it establishes a baseline industry wide that QOL issues are most important.

PRS Guitars 09-25-2022 03:13 PM


Originally Posted by ny797 (Post 3501195)
The majority of pilots are so short sighted it’s sad. Pay rates can change with a flick of a switch, and management will have no problem doing that if they see a need for it. Just look back 5 years ago when AA unilaterally gave an 8% raise, no strings attached.

What Alaska did was focus on quality of life issues. Some are major, some minor which I think is the beauty of the agreement.

I hope it passes for the sole reason that it establishes a baseline industry wide that QOL issues are most important.

Well, they got a 15 to 22% raise depending on where they sit, so, pretty sure pay rates matter too. That’s more than double what we were offered.

NotPhlying 09-25-2022 03:39 PM


Originally Posted by PRS Guitars (Post 3501365)
Well, they got a 15 to 22% raise depending on where they sit, so, pretty sure pay rates matter too. That’s more than double what we were offered.

Yes, but their pay was low to begin with.. with our current proposals (10/5/3) we would be on par with their pay scale. On a side note.. I don't agree with our proposed %.

PRS Guitars 09-25-2022 04:57 PM


Originally Posted by NotPhlying (Post 3501378)
Yes, but their pay was low to begin with.. with our current proposals (10/5/3) we would be on par with their pay scale. On a side note.. I don't agree with our proposed %.

that’s exactly my point…don’t look at their new rates but rather the %.

thrust 09-26-2022 04:10 AM


Originally Posted by NotPhlying (Post 3501378)
Yes, but their pay was low to begin with.. with our current proposals (10/5/3) we would be on par with their pay scale. On a side note.. I don't agree with our proposed %.

10/5/3 is AA’s garbage proposal, not APA’s..

NotPhlying 09-26-2022 09:55 AM


Originally Posted by thrust (Post 3501556)
10/5/3 is AA’s garbage proposal, not APA’s..

Who said anything about APA?

Hueypilot 09-26-2022 11:12 AM


Originally Posted by thrust (Post 3501556)
10/5/3 is AA’s garbage proposal, not APA’s..

APA’s 10/5/5 isn’t much better. At a *bare* minimum it should be 15/5/5, but more like 18/5/5 to retain the pay advantage AA enjoyed over AS.

thrust 09-26-2022 01:05 PM


Originally Posted by NotPhlying (Post 3501787)
Who said anything about APA?

You said “our current proposal”, did you not?

Do you work in management?

thrust 09-26-2022 01:07 PM


Originally Posted by Hueypilot (Post 3501844)
APA’s 10/5/5 isn’t much better. At a *bare* minimum it should be 15/5/5, but more like 18/5/5 to retain the pay advantage AA enjoyed over AS.

Agreed. Just pointing out that AA management’s offer of 10/5/3 is even more laughable than APA’s weak proposal.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:37 AM.


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands