![]() |
Originally Posted by Arado 234
(Post 3502403)
Oh my! Look at all them zeros. I wonder what Isom would do with those?
|
Originally Posted by Beech Dude
(Post 3503002)
Profit sharing? :D nah, just tack em on the end of his bonus check...
|
Originally Posted by thrust
(Post 3502090)
Ok… the pilot group didn’t propose 10/5/3. Management did. Double down again?
|
Originally Posted by RadialRover
(Post 3499868)
It’s not the zero sum game you’re painted it as. Management can open the purse strings for all its labor…no one is forcing anyone to take a sour deal. If it isn’t good, strike authorization votes are always an option.
|
Originally Posted by rdneckpilot
(Post 3503880)
no one will be allowed to strike. NLRB won’t release us. We are to important to air commerce. We might get to vote and rattle the swords but no way we get released to self help.
|
Originally Posted by rdneckpilot
(Post 3503880)
no one will be allowed to strike. NLRB won’t release us. We are to important to air commerce. We might get to vote and rattle the swords but no way we get released to self help.
|
Originally Posted by BcULstDaBlodyWr
(Post 3503995)
Have you been missing from the news the last few weeks? Freight railroads got released. One passenger airline would absolutely go through the steps. The only thing RLA and NMB does is force negotiations to happen and delay a strike 30 days. Then the president can delay another 30 days. Railroads got approved 6 months after filing for mediation and they’re far more necessary for commerce.
Any airline going on strike today would really tick off the general public, don't see too many politicians supporting a strike. Especially not for the larger airline in the world. That being said I still think we need to push for a much better offer from the company and not sign the current turd on the table. |
Originally Posted by rdneckpilot
(Post 3503880)
no one will be allowed to strike. NLRB won’t release us. We are to important to air commerce. We might get to vote and rattle the swords but no way we get released to self help.
|
Originally Posted by RadialRover
(Post 3504024)
It’s really self-defeating to act like we shouldn’t bother with a strike authorization because you think we might not actually strike, when it’s one of the few official ways to tell the company their efforts are seriously lacking. The ball isn’t moving, we ought to do something, and a strike authorization isn’t itself striking, it just sets the conditions within the union for it.
|
Originally Posted by NotPhlying
(Post 3504021)
US railroads going on strike would have cause havoc on the supply chain, no bueno for the mid terms. I believe the President has emergency power under the RLA Act to extend the cool off period up to 60 days or end the strike completely. I don't think they would have actually went on-strike.
Any airline going on strike today would really tick off the general public, don't see too many politicians supporting a strike. Especially not for the larger airline in the world=12pt. The fact no airline union has taken advantage of the political winds to move through the mediation process is a joke. If Republicans take back Congress, they’re more likely to impose the PEB’s solution, which in the case of the railroads, was a pro management deal. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:20 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands