Originally Posted by JulesWinfield (Post 3593714)

Not that bad, but the crappy part is that if a class junior to you gets a better drop, you're screwed.

Originally Posted by uavking (Post 3593722)

Between MIDT and a (roughly) quarterly bid, how exactly is one screwed?

Originally Posted by JulesWinfield (Post 3593728)

A pilot junior to you gets a base that you want immediately, while you have to wait for the effective date of a quarterly bid.

Originally Posted by aggieflyboy (Post 3593735)

Actually that helps you for mutual base exchanges because you wouldn’t be the plug

Originally Posted by thrust (Post 3590580)

Top Men are claiming that 401k and pay effective date at date of hire are in APA’s updated proposal. One Top Man claims the ask even includes retro for those particular items.

Ball’s in Robert’s court. You’ll see how much he values labor. Or, more accurately, Lucretia Guia’s court, since Robert farms out these type of things so he can hide and avoid making tough decisions.

Originally Posted by thrust (Post 3594367)

Bump.

Top Men were correct. Both 401k at date of hire and change to new hire pay effective date are both in APA’s updated proposal. See latest Negotiations Update.

“APA doesn’t care about new hires and won’t even ask!” has been completely destroyed.

Originally Posted by ImSoSuss (Post 3594380)

Encouraging news if actually true. I think that APA doesn't have to use any negotiating capital for this as AA realizes how quickly quality applicants are running out and it will be a war between the top Airlines for the best candidates.

Originally Posted by Bbaum (Post 3596856)

3/1 Class

LGA/FO/737/I 5

MIA/FO/737/I 4

LGA/FO/737/D 13

DCA/FO/320/I 4

PHL/FO/320/I 3

LGA/FO/320/D 18

Originally Posted by Bbaum (Post 3596856)