Search

Notices

Kahului - Hard Landing

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-13-2024, 10:29 AM
  #151  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2014
Posts: 3,139
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun
Sent trough entire program twice, flunked IOE after many extra hours, astounded FAA on observation ride and not in a good way! now a CA!
Sounds like Delta's problem, not AA's
Name User is offline  
Old 02-13-2024, 10:54 AM
  #152  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Turbosina's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2015
Position: Guppy Gear Slinger
Posts: 1,897
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun
You are very naive. I will say however they have lowered standards across the board.
We all know that hiring standards at all carriers have changed... It used to be that in order to get an interview at a mainline carrier, you needed plenty of 121 TPIC, ideally a master's degree, and either significant military time or regional CKA time. Now they're hiring guys with a few hundred hours in the right seat of an RJ. So yes, standards have changed.

It is also clear that every carrier is making efforts to interview more diverse candidates. I'm not denying that. What I am challenging is your assumption that once you're hired, there's somehow a different standard for training and checking, from sim through IOE through CQ, if you are a 'diverse" candidate. That just isn't the case. There isn't one set of CQ standards for white guys and another standard for everyone else.
Turbosina is offline  
Old 02-13-2024, 11:01 AM
  #153  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2021
Posts: 327
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun
That might be the case on the A320, it certainly is not on the A330. It would seem to be a huge error if it is true on the A320 as it will increase fuel burn. The A320 already operates at a disadvantage to the 737 with the more modern wing. I doubt they would make it worse on purpose.
Something about "doing the same thing over and over again" or whatnot.
4dalulz is offline  
Old 02-13-2024, 11:08 AM
  #154  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2019
Posts: 425
Default

Originally Posted by A330FoodCritic
Are you this open on the flight deck, or, just a keyboard warrior?

Had a CA, who was in the middle of making a derogatory comment about one of our female instructors, I told him he needed to S_T_F_U, it just got quiet.

I would love to fly with you.
Proof? Or, it didn’t happen.
APCHCLIMB is offline  
Old 02-13-2024, 11:42 AM
  #155  
Can afford 2 iPhone 15s
 
Joined APC: Jul 2023
Position: "Back on the panel"
Posts: 63
Default

Originally Posted by APCHCLIMB
Proof? Or, it didn’t happen.
No he did man, I have a great polaroid of it.

One time on OE, the CKA tried to tell me that Miatas weren't sports cars so I told him to "eat a bag of d***s."
Werjower is offline  
Old 02-13-2024, 12:35 PM
  #156  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2019
Posts: 425
Default

Originally Posted by Werjower
No he did man, I have a great polaroid of it.

One time on OE, the CKA tried to tell me that Miatas weren't sports cars so I told him to "eat a bag of d***s."
The real story probably was the other way around. The captain told his lefty @ss to S_T_F_U and that’s why it was quiet.
APCHCLIMB is offline  
Old 02-13-2024, 04:56 PM
  #157  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: Window seat
Posts: 5,294
Default

Originally Posted by JulesWinfield
So you make up a procedure and you’re upset the FO doesn’t understand what you want?
No. We had a big discussion about technique vs procedure. He said "everyone says 'stable' while the engines are accelerating." He said it while the command sector was at, or approaching the limit, and the engines were at full acceleration. I'd never seen that. So I asked him what that was about. We don't say stable. We also don't have a requirement to stablize the engines during the application of power. He'd watched guys bring over their airline procedures and he'd started copying them...except he didn't realize that they were actually targeting, and pausing, at 40%. So he was fire walling them and saying 'stable' at some point while setting takeoff thrust. So there's two camps - the guys who haven't flown large jets that often light switch the power and the ex-airline guys who spool them up to 40% +/-, confirm stable, and then advance the thrust. There is no procedure about applying power except to set it. Some guys light switch it from, some from 40% and I tell the younger guys "I play 'catch me if you can'" after 40% where the command sector stays comfortably ahead of the actual thrust so that acceleration is constant but isn't fire walled from the stable setting. That's technique.

It was a technique that he'd seen "all" the ex-airline guys do but he didn't understand the details, the concept, or the reasons. Sitting in position on SNA's 20R and there's a big split N1 skid mark to the right. At that point the reason for the technique (procedure at airlines) was obvious. If you ever see it happen it can be violent. You often can see the nose wheel skid marks getting wider and thinner as the plane is porpoising up and down on the nose strut violently. PHL 08L had a big w/b skid mark to the left. DFW 17R had a 737's split N1 skid mark to the left. JFK had a big one on 31L. MIA 08R. They fade after 6-12 months?
Sliceback is offline  
Old 02-13-2024, 05:05 PM
  #158  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: Window seat
Posts: 5,294
Default

Originally Posted by Seven3guy
Sorry, but I've been in the industry for nearly 20 years, been in 3 training departments and have never heard of anything close to this. More than 1 standard? Never heard of that.
What's the standard number of sims before someone gets fired? The record I was told was 26 sims. It's a 10 sim program. In 2014 4% of newhires needed an extra sim and 6% needed 2 extra sims. How many needed >2 extra sims wasn't mentioned publically. If everyone doesn't get 26 sims is there a chance there's multiple standards? He got the 'good guy, trying hard' standard. Needless to say there were some ****ed off CKA which is how the number came out.
Sliceback is offline  
Old 02-13-2024, 05:15 PM
  #159  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: Window seat
Posts: 5,294
Default

Originally Posted by rustypigeon
What is a technique? What aircraft?

I thought the subject was engine stabilization before advancing to takeoff thrust. That is a procedure for obvious reasons, not a technique.
Aircraft dependant. It's a procedure on all aircraft...until I got qualified on one where it's not a procedure. So the old heads have used their old procedures as a technique and some of the young guys are trying to emulate it.

FOM - TAKEOFF - Thrust levers ......TO/GA. That is it. Zero to hero, light switch them, whatever...just get it to TO/GA.
Sliceback is offline  
Old 02-13-2024, 07:01 PM
  #160  
Line Holder
 
Seven3guy's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2023
Position: LUV 737 FO
Posts: 28
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun
There are different standards for the amount of additional training and OE allowed before termination.
Um, no there isn't. I've spent years as an evaluator and LCA and have never heard nor heard of any different testing standard.
Seven3guy is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
TheFly
Safety
2
10-23-2013 02:10 PM
RightSide
Major
22
05-12-2009 03:12 PM
SWAjet
Hangar Talk
9
04-10-2006 09:51 PM
AIRGUY
Regional
39
01-30-2006 08:47 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices