AA TA - Industry Rate Comparables (DOS+36)
#101
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: Window seat
Posts: 5,213
#102
As far as the 1113, nobody but AMR managment knows what terms would be imposed in the event the process is carried out. The contract would be abroggeated and the company can/will impose workrules at their will, they could impose the initial 1113 term sheet, the updated 1113, the recent TA or somewhere in between! At this point that is the big unknown. AMR managment has been quoted saying that if the 1113 process is carried out they will impose the initial 1113 and not the gains made during barganing, this could be truth or this could be leverage but is an unknown, but if the initial 1113 is imposed the consequences with labor could be costly.
#110
:-)
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,339
Getting your contract rejected by the judge is almost always the better option, and in the long run, it has gotten a better contract than the initial TA offering. Also, APA will win the current 1113(c) process motion since the current one from AA does not meet the requirements of fair and equitable bargaining. You will have a much better leg to stand on after the judge rejects AA's motion, trust me, voting yes on that TA is a mistake.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post