What now?
#21
T,
My understanding is the PBGC was quick to tell AMR that they will not be able to just dump the pensions onto the taxpayers. I haven't looked it up myself but I was told that the % per ticket to fund AMR's frozen pension is less before bancruptcy than other carriers after bankruptcy.
Why would senior pilots lose anything if they leave? As long as they give proper notice they shouldn't lose anything correct? Or am completely bass ackwards?
TC
My understanding is the PBGC was quick to tell AMR that they will not be able to just dump the pensions onto the taxpayers. I haven't looked it up myself but I was told that the % per ticket to fund AMR's frozen pension is less before bancruptcy than other carriers after bankruptcy.
Why would senior pilots lose anything if they leave? As long as they give proper notice they shouldn't lose anything correct? Or am completely bass ackwards?
TC
You raise an interesting premise. This is not flamebait, but rather a legitimate question. What makes you think the senior guys will be the ones to walk away? It is they that have the most to lose in that scenario. In the ruling, the judge stated that the average retirement is over $1 million. Average. That means some are worth more.. some less. It isn't hard to figure which ones are worth more. And as was also pointed out, the company offered.. to freeze, rather than terminate those pensions. So why would those senior guys walk away from that? Now if those pensions get terminated, you might have a point, but if there is still money in the bank.. why would they leave first of all, and second, where would they go?
Another question: Why is American running short on pilots? Is it due to temporary events like sick outs, or are guys quitting?
And if eagle's premise is valid.. not saying it is or isn't, and enough guys leave, my bet is that management would sell the remaining pieces to the highest bidder. His premise is that the pilots would force a fire sale, and ultimately a Chapter 7. All those 737 slots and the 777-300s you speak of are worth a lot of coin in that case, and the South America book is worth a small fortune. I get the burn it down feeling that is there, but all the forum bluster aside, what will be gained by going nuclear? Guys might feel better for a little while, but how long will that feeling last when you are looking to M R Rats for a job?
Again, the above is not intended in any way as flamebait. I am just trying to understand the thought processes that are going on.
Another question: Why is American running short on pilots? Is it due to temporary events like sick outs, or are guys quitting?
And if eagle's premise is valid.. not saying it is or isn't, and enough guys leave, my bet is that management would sell the remaining pieces to the highest bidder. His premise is that the pilots would force a fire sale, and ultimately a Chapter 7. All those 737 slots and the 777-300s you speak of are worth a lot of coin in that case, and the South America book is worth a small fortune. I get the burn it down feeling that is there, but all the forum bluster aside, what will be gained by going nuclear? Guys might feel better for a little while, but how long will that feeling last when you are looking to M R Rats for a job?
Again, the above is not intended in any way as flamebait. I am just trying to understand the thought processes that are going on.
#22
On a side note
It seems many of the experts the APA used did not earn their pay.
Under the medical benefits section the judge states that the APA expert received his cost savings figures from a software program. He didn't know how many people the software utilized or any other assumptions the software had programmed.
Page 62 of the judgement
TC
Under the medical benefits section the judge states that the APA expert received his cost savings figures from a software program. He didn't know how many people the software utilized or any other assumptions the software had programmed.
Page 62 of the judgement
TC
#23
Banned
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
This is from the judge's ruling (they are not contiguous paragraphs, just quotes):
The March 21 Proposal would allow American’s regional partners to fly aircraft with a maximum of 88 seats and a MTOW of 114,500 pounds. (AA Ex. 918). The maximum number of regional jets of 51 to 88 seats would be capped at the greater of 255 or 50% of the total number of mainline aircraft in use at the time. (AA Ex. 918; American’s APA Motion at 23 n.18). The maximum number of regional jets of 50 seats or less would remain at 110% of the narrow body aircraft flown at the mainline at the time. (AA Ex. 918). Additionally, the distinction between owned and non-owned commuter carriers would be eliminated—all would be operated as if owned. (AA Ex. 918). Based on current fleet size, the APA calculates that the March 21 Proposal would permit the Company to use 536 regional jets of up to 50 seats and 304 regional jets of 51 to 88 seats. (Eaton Decl. ¶ 25). The APA’s primary objection relates to the use of the larger regional jets.
The Court finds, therefore, that American has shown that the request in the March 21 Proposal is reasonable and necessary when compared to its network competitors.
This is a comparison between the TA the American pilots voted down and what there new working conditions will be if they let the judge rule:
So you can yell at me all you want. I am just the weatherman, you can scream at me for telling you that it is raining, or you can go find an umbrella. If this fight is about RJ's the choice is pretty stark. The TA had terms much more favorable to the American pilots than the judges ruling will be. Read his decision, let me know how you think this will go.
Little children can hurl insults on this forum all day. Let me know how that works for you in the real world.
The March 21 Proposal would allow American’s regional partners to fly aircraft with a maximum of 88 seats and a MTOW of 114,500 pounds. (AA Ex. 918). The maximum number of regional jets of 51 to 88 seats would be capped at the greater of 255 or 50% of the total number of mainline aircraft in use at the time. (AA Ex. 918; American’s APA Motion at 23 n.18). The maximum number of regional jets of 50 seats or less would remain at 110% of the narrow body aircraft flown at the mainline at the time. (AA Ex. 918). Additionally, the distinction between owned and non-owned commuter carriers would be eliminated—all would be operated as if owned. (AA Ex. 918). Based on current fleet size, the APA calculates that the March 21 Proposal would permit the Company to use 536 regional jets of up to 50 seats and 304 regional jets of 51 to 88 seats. (Eaton Decl. ¶ 25). The APA’s primary objection relates to the use of the larger regional jets.
The Court finds, therefore, that American has shown that the request in the March 21 Proposal is reasonable and necessary when compared to its network competitors.
This is a comparison between the TA the American pilots voted down and what there new working conditions will be if they let the judge rule:
So you can yell at me all you want. I am just the weatherman, you can scream at me for telling you that it is raining, or you can go find an umbrella. If this fight is about RJ's the choice is pretty stark. The TA had terms much more favorable to the American pilots than the judges ruling will be. Read his decision, let me know how you think this will go.
Little children can hurl insults on this forum all day. Let me know how that works for you in the real world.
In regards to the TA scope provisions, THAT agreement allows presently approximately 375 RJ's and could include the E-190 as the term "comparable aircraft" is a contractually meaningless definition. In fact, a large percentage of the TA DID NOT EVEN HAVE FINAL CONTRACT LANGUAGE AT THE TIME OF VOTE DEADLINE, so in effect, much of the TA MEANT NOTHING (at least nothing defendable). Additionally, the codesharing provisions allow for other carriers to fly another 300 or so aircraft of ANY SIZE that would replace AA domestic flying. At that point the game is over anyway for most of the AA pilot group and it matters little whether its 79 or 88 seats as WITH the TA, AMR can place perhaps 700 aircraft into future service ranging from small RJ/turboprops, up to ANY size aircraft flying domestically. The TA was giving up virtually everything anyway and destroying any possible leverage for a decade (or more), so that coupled with the other provisions that put AA pilots SQUARELY at the bottom of the coming playing field in compensation and in fact, by a significant margin, made the decesion clear for most pilots. There was simply nothing to work with in the TA.
Your argument, while it MAY appear to have merit as TECHNICALLY the TA was better then the 1113, in reality it does NOT have merit as REALISTICALLY, the TA ensures it's all over for most AA pilots. BTW, considering the age of this pilot group, this TA would have been the LAST contract for the majority of pilots here and basically they'd be finishing their careers in the worst situation possible. As it stands now, there still is a potential future to be negotiated at some point that will likely provide much better then this garbage, sandbag TA. I must say I find it odd you're so emotionally aggressive regarding another pilot group that didn't see things the way you do and you seem to be taking it personally. I'm sorry most aren't buying your erronous advice. This leads me to suspicions you either have another motive (self-interest) or perhaps you are another poser pretending to be a pilot.
Just why ARE you so emotional about the AA pilots situation ?
#24
Banned
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
Another interesting sidenote was that the judge said that AMR decided to freeze, rather than terminate the pension plans, which will result in significant cost to the company. Additionally, he also said that the matter of pensions are not before the court. Draw your own conclusions about that. This ruling, and the one to come are only concerned with the pilots' contract, not the retirement plan.
"Leverage".........what a concept, eh ?
At any rate, once this BK is over and the PBGC doesn't have the ability to put leins on assets (loss of leverage) or have judges to influence, I'd expect AMR to terminate in the future as it saves money. That would fit perfectly with their M.O., IMO. BTW, when that happens, guess whose paychecks will likely be the place to find $$$ to make that up for the PBGC ?
Yep, the taxpayers (look for more $$$ skimmed from your paychecks in the future).
#25
Banned
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
We know that the judge is likely to grant he company's request to abrogate the contracts. But do you think that AMR will get another contract with APA if they have 200 E-190 being flown by regionals while the other legacies are limited to CRJ 900 and E-175. How many guys do you think will stick around working down to FAR and a hit on pay(loss of work rules). APA is likely to be better off from the events in the last few weeks. I believe the judge has set a hearing for Sep 4, from there we are likely to see instructions from the judge. This is going to cost AMR another month or so at least. The longer this happens the shorter AA runs on pilots and the closer we get to those 777-300 getting on property and creating a training bubble as senior guys get fed up and walk away. 400 pilots in the fall created a mess last year, AMR has it fresh on their minds. Listen to what Eagle fly says, if AMR makes it bad enough that guys just leave AMR is stuck! they won't be able to get people on property fast enough.
- You'll note that through all of this AMR has YET to place a single RJ replacement/expenasion order, which indicates risk-averse financiers are reluctant to commit to sitting on a volcano at this time, under these circumstances. Considering aircraft delivery times and ramp-up hiring/training, you'd think they would have moved already if they could and they are antsy to begin their POR which hasn't happened yet.
- Perhaps they feel that the best deal to save face and demonstrate to all that THEY are in control of their labor (especially their pilots) is to return to the table as the one with perceived leverage with AA pilots operating under "uncertainty and pain" with no contract ?
- One pathway out is an agreement between Horton, Parker, the creditors and the judge for a U merger within BK, but that would guarantee a minimum payout (stock and bonuses, etc.) upon exit for Horton and his team along with a transition period that lets Horton manage the situation until some point in the future when Parker takes over. If they can technically proclaim a merger while still in BK, then the CLA that the APA inked with Parker becomes the offical CBA for AA pilots which would defuse the AA pilot contract situation until the reorganization is complete and BK is exited. That CLA has terms that are WELL below those that would be at Delta or United in the future and thus beancounters and cash-dispensers alike would be satisfied with that outcome and the ball could begin rolling for all concerned.
- Perhaps Horton will announce a hook-up with Jet Blue and then use SLI issues as leverage and a fear-stick against AA pilots to capitulate to a substandard CBA ?
* Yes, I know JB management has made certain statements of their lack of interest in hook-ups, but that would be exactly what should be said if there was something in the works as opposed to the opposite, so statements like these are meaningless. Isn't it odd how AA has relinquished the Carribean, Boston and to a lessor degree JFK to JB so easily ?
Why would they do that ?
At any rate, I think AMR is now telling the creditors that the pilot labor end-game is near and to be patient just a bit longer. Likely, on Sept. 4, it seems Lane will have the boxes checked to grant AMR's abrogation request and then after that, I expect them to sit down with the APA and make a move.
What move, is the $64,000 question. As far as AA flying off the rails in the interim, tI agree that it depends on what level they begin a TRUE assault on the pilots (up to now, it's been abstract and not reality). If pilots are now forced to work days off, reassigned with impunity, etc., and watching their paychecks collapse in the process (along with NO pension contributions) and even perhaps token terminations, then many pilots will simply choose fight or flight as their lives will simply become unmanageable. Personally, I can't comprehend a management that would create such a situation and have those affected out there operating aircraft, but at any rate, EITHER of those possibilities are bad for all parties and I think flight will be the most likely, thus my prediction of increasing and uncontrollable attrition. It won't be a labor statement, simply (mostly) older men in their 50's and even 60's simply not able to exist like that and rationalizing other options with their lives. 777's and 737's may quite quickly have to be parked as any hiring/training would take 3-4 months per pilot to replace pilots who gave 0-2 weeks notice of retirement/resignation. You can see how that could get out-of-hand quickly. As it stands now, AA is very short in most statuses, begging for pilots to fly premium on days off. The Holiday season will be approaching and that would be a bad time to lose 3-500 pilots on short-notice. A situation like that may be looked upon as evidence of the apple cart indeed beginning its roll.
For all concerned, it is hoped that whatever moves and plays are imminent over the next weeks and months that stability be maintained so as to maximize a viable path out of this mess. This BK is now at the point where things HAVE TO BEGIN TO HAPPEN. Personally, I give it 50/50. No copout there, just no idea which way this mess (and it IS a mess) will go.
#26
Banned
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
It seems many of the experts the APA used did not earn their pay.
Under the medical benefits section the judge states that the APA expert received his cost savings figures from a software program. He didn't know how many people the software utilized or any other assumptions the software had programmed.
Page 62 of the judgement
TC
Under the medical benefits section the judge states that the APA expert received his cost savings figures from a software program. He didn't know how many people the software utilized or any other assumptions the software had programmed.
Page 62 of the judgement
TC
You'll also note during this same 9 month period they have yet to institute a single, solitary labor cut and still they've made a billion in 9 months. You'd have to be a certifed idiot to not see what's really happening here. AA pilots see it and they are at least resisting it with every ability they have and not capitualting to every fable and story read to them designed to seize their money (past, present and future) as easily as possible like alfaromeo is advocating.
#27
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 155
#28
:-)
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,339
#29
Banned
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
If that's the case, I think he's looking at this situation backwards. The TA provisions would be more devistating over a ten-year or longer period to the interests of United or Delta pilots interests, whereas the "uncertainty and pain" of the 1113 is certain to have a much shorter shelf life.
#30