Search
Notices

NDA is signed?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-28-2012, 02:13 PM
  #21  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
Default

Originally Posted by Flyby1206 View Post
Would the motivation be any greater for E/W to agree on a SLI to present to APA as opposed to a SLI to move forward with their own contract during the past several years?
I don't know what their motivations would be internally, my point was I would THINK any arbitration would require that any 2 carriers would each present 1 seniority list for consideration.

Now previously when AWA and U merged, that is what eventually occured, did it not ?

It was ruled upon and the only reason I see that it isn't in place was a majority who didn't like the result had the ability to decertify the union, form their own and essentially exploit an "end run" around a resolution they disliked by dominating the minority. That option will likely not be available this time though. Prior to starting that process all over again, I would THINK that only 2 lists would be accepted for and future arbitration on a merger SLI.
eaglefly is offline  
Old 08-28-2012, 02:42 PM
  #22  
SDQ Base Chief
 
Flyby1206's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: 320 CA
Posts: 5,588
Default

Yea that would make complete logical sense, but with the past as a guide you never know what will happen. I was just thinking since the two groups are still separate carriers that the merger would be treated as a three way (giggity!) with AA/US/HP.
Flyby1206 is offline  
Old 08-28-2012, 04:32 PM
  #23  
New Hire
 
Joined APC: Aug 2011
Posts: 4
Default

Originally Posted by Flyby1206 View Post
I was just thinking since the two groups are still separate carriers that the merger would be treated as a three way (giggity!) with AA/US/HP.
That is an incorrect statement.
The pilot groups have separate CBA's, that's the only separation.
Single operating certificate.
JimmyJim is offline  
Old 08-28-2012, 05:14 PM
  #24  
SDQ Base Chief
 
Flyby1206's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: 320 CA
Posts: 5,588
Default

Originally Posted by JimmyJim View Post
That is an incorrect statement.
The pilot groups have separate CBA's, that's the only separation.
Single operating certificate.
Ahh, my bad I was unaware. Thanks for the clarification.
Flyby1206 is offline  
Old 08-28-2012, 05:47 PM
  #25  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Pineapple Guy's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,462
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun View Post
I have a lot of friends at USAIR. The question of if you negotiate a 3 way new list or a 2 way list using Nic for both E and W USAIR pilots is near and dear to every USAIR pilot and which choice you would like to see depends on if your east or west.
One fact however is that it may be likely for USAIR that regardless of which method ends up being used it may not functionally change the makeup of the final SLI if the merger happens. This is because the arbitration community is a very close knit small group. Whoever is assigned the AA SLI will be very aware of the NIC ruling and is not likely to step on the prior ruling. This is one reason why any union should be very careful on what they bring to arbitration and how they conduct themselves with the NMB and in arbitration. When you spit in the arbitration communities face and call them incompetent it does not bode well for you the next time you have to use their services. Every union should keep that in mind. Solid leadership is often required to maintain the type of relationship you need with the NMB even though it may go against the wishes of many in a specific union group.
Excellent point, sailing.
Pineapple Guy is offline  
Old 08-28-2012, 07:14 PM
  #26  
Da Hudge
 
80ktsClamp's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: Poodle Whisperer
Posts: 17,473
Default

Originally Posted by Pineapple Guy View Post
Excellent point, sailing.
It's rare that I say this...so I thought I'd make sure I post it: spot on sailing and PG.
80ktsClamp is offline  
Old 08-29-2012, 01:56 AM
  #27  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2012
Position: AB 320 Captain
Posts: 355
Default

As always, who ever has the best lawyers and has the most cash will prevail.
CaptainBigWood is offline  
Old 08-29-2012, 04:04 AM
  #28  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 19,273
Default

Originally Posted by CaptainBigWood View Post
As always, who ever has the best lawyers and has the most cash will prevail.
That has not proved correct in SLI arbitrations.
sailingfun is offline  
Old 08-29-2012, 07:18 AM
  #29  
Gets Weekends Off
 
LittleBoyBlew's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Position: Bigg Bird!!
Posts: 599
Default

The "Nic" can only be implemented IF a joint E/W cba is ratified. As we all know THAT has not happened. Kirby, among others, has mentioned that in case of a AA/US merger, a 3 party process would be pursued.
LittleBoyBlew is offline  
Old 08-29-2012, 10:25 AM
  #30  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,240
Default

Originally Posted by LittleBoyBlew View Post
The "Nic" can only be implemented IF a joint E/W cba is ratified. As we all know THAT has not happened. Kirby, among others, has mentioned that in case of a AA/US merger, a 3 party process would be pursued.
Yup that's the ticket. Because it is Awa,Aa and usair merging. Btw what is the only combined list at usairways? I'll give you a clue, it is the list usapa is trying to change.
cactiboss is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
heading180
Regional
6098
08-18-2014 01:11 PM
misterwl
American
1
07-31-2012 10:54 AM
oncea57cap
United
96
09-27-2010 05:59 AM
FlightPhoenix
Cargo
42
12-15-2008 09:45 PM
carl p
Mergers and Acquisitions
39
04-28-2008 05:34 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices