Search
Notices

NDA is signed?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-30-2012, 07:54 PM
  #41  
Gets Weekends Off
 
MayDaze's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2011
Posts: 139
Default

Originally Posted by CaptainBigWood View Post
APA is not sympathetic to NIC. My bet is the arbitrator will want to keep peace with a much much larger APA. DP and ToHo will want the majority to be less P Off. The question is will the list to the arbitrator be the NIC or DOH. That is where the best lawyers prevail.


I have no dog in the fight but I do have... common sense. There is no way APA wants to hand over their widebodies.

I fully understand why you want DOH and I am sympathetic, but it's a new era. It's not fair to take another's pilot's job.
MayDaze is offline  
Old 08-30-2012, 09:21 PM
  #42  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2012
Position: AB 320 Captain
Posts: 355
Default

I do not expect an arbitration that would greatly upset APA since they have the greater numbers. The way the arbitrator selects a USAirways list is anyone's guess. I expect USAirway pilots to be fenced off AA original equipment for many years. There will be no windfall for USAirways pilots even if it was DOH because most of the East will be gone prior to a fence expiration. Arbitration is anyone's guess, a MOU must first pass then a CBA.
CaptainBigWood is offline  
Old 08-30-2012, 10:45 PM
  #43  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,240
Default

Originally Posted by CaptainBigWood View Post
I do not expect an arbitration that would greatly upset APA since they have the greater numbers. The way the arbitrator selects a USAirways list is anyone's guess. I expect USAirway pilots to be fenced off AA original equipment for many years. There will be no windfall for USAirways pilots even if it was DOH because most of the East will be gone prior to a fence expiration. Arbitration is anyone's guess, a MOU must first pass then a CBA.
So an arbitration must please the American pilots, otherwise they will do what the east pilots did and impose whatever list they want. So glad to see nothing has changed on the east.
cactiboss is offline  
Old 08-30-2012, 11:07 PM
  #44  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: Window seat
Posts: 5,229
Default

Originally Posted by CaptainBigWood View Post
APA is not sympathetic to NIC.
Where'd you get that from?
Sliceback is offline  
Old 08-31-2012, 04:59 AM
  #45  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,539
Default

Originally Posted by CaptainBigWood View Post
The MOU implies a single combined SL must be completed within 18 months of a joint CBA. Arbitrators typically bill by hour or day for services rendered. They get paid more to delay delay delay. Summer 2014 is the earliest, with likely fences. There may be a CBA, this year. Combined ops may be delayed for years.
You're living in a USAPA fantasy world.

The courts have already ruled that "but for" ripeness, USAPA has violated DFR by not implementing the NIC. USAirways management is seeking declaratory judgement on which list they must use to protect themselves during negotiations with USAPA.

If APA is to be the surviving union, do you think for a minute they'd agree to a list that could be undone by court order/judgement?

USAPA is out of ideas, airspeed and money. Your $85/hr 25 year f/o's will be far better off under the CLA if your group can get there.
slowplay is offline  
Old 08-31-2012, 05:45 AM
  #46  
On Reserve
 
buckeye88's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2011
Position: CRJ 200/700
Posts: 34
Default

Saw this when checking flights this morning on wings.

Non-Disclosure Agreement (NDA) Signed: An Important Message from CEO Doug Parker



August 31, 2012



Dear Fellow Employees:



Today we announced that US Airways has entered into a Non-Disclosure Agreement (NDA) with American Airlines’ parent company, under which both companies have agreed to exchange certain confidential information and to work in good faith to evaluate a potential combination. We are pleased to be working directly with American to study a potential merger and we consider this very good news. It does not mean we are merging – it simply means we have agreed to work together to discuss and analyze a potential merger.



A Non-Disclosure Agreement is pretty much what it sounds like. We, along with American, have agreed to not publicly disclose anything about the discussions or analysis as we move forward because we don’t believe that would be productive. We have also agreed not to discuss the work that is being done to analyze a potential combination with anyone not covered by the NDA. This agreement will likely remain in place until either a deal has been signed or we have determined this process will not result in a transaction.



As a result, we will not be able to be as open and candid about the discussions with American as we usually are about issues that are important to all of us. We will still be very communicative, of course, about all other aspects of our airline, and our Communications Team will continue their great work through About US, US Daily, Wings, State of the Airline webcasts, Crew News webcasts, etc.



I trust you recognize the importance of signing this NDA and we appreciate your understanding. While we may not be providing regular updates on this process, rest assured your management team is working diligently and aggressively to do what is best for US Airways and our hard-working team members. I will let you know more as soon we are able.



In the meantime, please keep up the great work. You all are doing a wonderful job of taking care of our customers and running a great airline. The results are remarkable. Thank you so much for all you do.



Sincerely,

Doug
buckeye88 is offline  
Old 08-31-2012, 07:00 AM
  #47  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2008
Posts: 439
Default

Originally Posted by CaptainBigWood View Post
APA is not sympathetic to NIC. ..............
Judging from what I am hearing from jumpseaters (admittedly an unscientific poll), that is not an accurate statement.
Seaslap8 is offline  
Old 08-31-2012, 07:47 AM
  #48  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Gomerglideslope's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2009
Posts: 335
Default

Originally Posted by CaptainBigWood View Post
I do not expect an arbitration that would greatly upset APA since they have the greater numbers. The way the arbitrator selects a USAirways list is anyone's guess. I expect USAirway pilots to be fenced off AA original equipment for many years. There will be no windfall for USAirways pilots even if it was DOH because most of the East will be gone prior to a fence expiration. Arbitration is anyone's guess, a MOU must first pass then a CBA.
Keeping the biggest dog at the table (APA) happy will not be one of the guiding principles followed by an arbitrator...if this deal is ever done, the SLI will undoubtedly go to arbitration. If you think the starting point will be anything other than the APA list and the NIC list, you are mistaken.
Gomerglideslope is offline  
Old 08-31-2012, 08:42 AM
  #49  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2012
Position: AB 320 Captain
Posts: 355
Default

USAPA has to present a list. Which one do you think they will submit? It will take a legal action to force a presentation of the NIC. That could very well happen. Arbitration is two years away the way I read it.
CaptainBigWood is offline  
Old 08-31-2012, 08:48 AM
  #50  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2010
Position: Doing what you do, for less.
Posts: 1,792
Default

Why can't USAPA just present multiple lists? The Nic, their DOH version, and the east/west lists separate? Then let the arbitrator decide?
lolwut is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
heading180
Regional
6098
08-18-2014 01:11 PM
misterwl
American
1
07-31-2012 10:54 AM
oncea57cap
United
96
09-27-2010 05:59 AM
FlightPhoenix
Cargo
42
12-15-2008 09:45 PM
carl p
Mergers and Acquisitions
39
04-28-2008 05:34 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices