Search

Notices

AOL update

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-29-2014 | 06:30 PM
  #3031  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 5,299
Likes: 0
From: A320 Capt
Default

Originally Posted by cactiboss
you are welcome junior.

Nobody can steal your dreams AH.
Reply
Old 04-29-2014 | 07:29 PM
  #3032  
Banned
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by PurpleTurtle
Lot's of things could be viewed as myopic, but in the context of a seniority dispute all things (action or inaction, by all parties) must be viewed as a negotiating strategy or a legal strategy (which itself affects the negotiations strategy).

Grab your popcorn and a beverage and enjoy the show, or beech about what cannot be controlled from a message board of entertainment.
Been enjoying it from the beginning. AFAIC, until Parker and APA make statements confirming anything, USAPA is just whacking off again.
Reply
Old 04-29-2014 | 07:38 PM
  #3033  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,967
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by eaglefly
Been enjoying it from the beginning. AFAIC, until Parker and APA make statements confirming anything, USAPA is just whacking off again.
That's what I like about you eagle fly. You never let your emotions prevent you from being transparent.
Reply
Old 04-30-2014 | 02:06 AM
  #3034  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 355
Likes: 0
From: AB 320 Captain
Default

Originally Posted by R57 relay
Thank you sane 767 captain.
Cacti, when did you last fly a leg in the 767?
Rest easy knowing that the most junior APA 757 pilot has eight years more LOS.
West pilots could have held 330 Captain on the last bid with DOH, it went to April 1984 DOH.
USAPA has only done one thing right. Delay, Delay, Delay

Last edited by CaptainBigWood; 04-30-2014 at 02:18 AM.
Reply
Old 04-30-2014 | 03:28 AM
  #3035  
Banned
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,043
Likes: 0
From: A330
Default

Originally Posted by CaptainBigWood
West pilots could have held 330 Captain on the last bid with DOH, it went to April 1984 DOH.
Are you trying to say it's the west guys losing money now? HHMMM
Reply
Old 04-30-2014 | 04:27 AM
  #3036  
Flies With The Hat On
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,339
Likes: 0
From: Right of the Left Seat
Default

Originally Posted by PurpleTurtle
Quote:





Originally Posted by cactiboss


These are usapas own "proposals" to the APA that were voted on by the bpr, not an "agreement" with APA, you get that right?





I never said the APA announced any agreement, but none the less you
you didn't answer my question, right?

Here's another question for you, where is Whiskey Delta? We miss him.
Before the timeline was ever extended the USAPA and APA merger committees agreed to a Merger Protocol Agreement. There was actually a cooling off period after this agreement as discussions had concluded. At the 11th of the Merger Protocol Agreement timeline APA came back to the table with a new agreement that called for USAPA to release language that guaranteed control of it's merger committee.

USAPA's resolution is a legal maneuver, USAPA's BPR just voted in the original merger protocol agreement that APA's merger committee originally agreed to before reneging.
Reply
Old 04-30-2014 | 04:49 AM
  #3037  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 203
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by flybywire44
USAPA's resolution is a legal maneuver, USAPA's BPR just voted in the original merger protocol agreement that APA's merger committee originally agreed to before reneging.
Is there any indication that the APA has agreed to any of these documents?
Reply
Old 04-30-2014 | 04:58 AM
  #3038  
Flies With The Hat On
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,339
Likes: 0
From: Right of the Left Seat
Default

Originally Posted by algflyr
Is there any indication that the APA has agreed to any of these documents?
Negotiating notes substantiate that months ago the APA merger committee agreed to the Merger Protocol Agreement that USAPA's BPR committee approved yesterday.

However, the APA merger committee is not the signing agent for APA.

USAPA's is just posturing for the pending lawsuit, and arbitration.

This is what happens when both APA and USAPA lack integrity—things get dirty.
Reply
Old 04-30-2014 | 06:15 AM
  #3039  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,967
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by flybywire44
Negotiating notes substantiate that months ago the APA merger committee agreed to the Merger Protocol Agreement that USAPA's BPR committee approved yesterday.

However, the APA merger committee is not the signing agent for APA.

USAPA's is just posturing for the pending lawsuit, and arbitration.

This is what happens when both APA and USAPA lack integrity—things get dirty.
It's nothing to do with integrity. It just negotiating tactics. Accusations about integrity are just one more tactic among many. All is fair in love and war. There is no war in labor greater than when unions collide over SLI.
Reply
Old 04-30-2014 | 07:06 AM
  #3040  
Banned
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by algflyr
Is there any indication that the APA has agreed to any of these documents?
Hummel will sign for the APA and then hold up the agreement amid cheers in Charlotte.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
gettinbumped
United
0
12-11-2012 11:29 AM
cactiboss
American
29
05-16-2012 06:24 PM
LifeNtheFstLne
United
51
11-16-2010 11:47 AM
HSLD
Hiring News
2
11-14-2006 04:32 PM
HSLD
Hiring News
1
02-08-2006 10:37 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices