Search
Notices

Hiring announced

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-07-2013, 04:59 PM
  #161  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: Window seat
Posts: 5,245
Default

TQ - bingo!
Sliceback is offline  
Old 10-07-2013, 05:15 PM
  #162  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Oct 2005
Posts: 55
Default

Good luck! It'll be an interesting next couple years.

Last edited by pilotlbs; 10-07-2013 at 05:36 PM.
pilotlbs is offline  
Old 10-08-2013, 12:30 AM
  #163  
On Reserve
 
Joined APC: Dec 2011
Position: Airbus
Posts: 11
Default

Originally Posted by TQ Nola View Post
Although I can't be 100% positive since nobody's asked me to sit in on any of the interviewing, this has the aroma of wild-*ss (incorrect) rumor to it.

Having previous Airbus (or Boeing time, for that matter) doesn't make any of the courses shorter and doesn't save the company any money.

In so far as having flown an Airbus/Boeing shows that you are able to fly a big airplane, the company will like that. But there are other big airplanes out there (eg Mickey D's or military transports) that show the same thing, and the company will like that also.

Thinking you've got a leg up because you know your way around a 319's cockpit is, I believe, a colossal misunderstanding of the process.

What they're really looking for is somebody who can show he or she is smart, experienced, safety-conscious, conscientious, has common sense, and wouldn't be a giant downer on layovers. Not necessarily in that order.
Not here to disagree..
BUT..
After all the things you listed which definitely come first before anything else, having that Airbus/Boeing time will help in my opinion. Especially the Airbus time. Why you ask? Well, when you have a pilot group with ZERO experience flying the A320 series, somewhere/somehow the thought of getting some guys on property with experience has to come up in the mind of everyone that is working this hiring process.
Again this is my logic , so I could be totally wrong, but hey it's a forum.
Good luck to everyone!
Bad Brains is offline  
Old 10-08-2013, 05:39 AM
  #164  
Derp...
 
Joined APC: Mar 2011
Posts: 386
Default

Boeing or Airbus time won't mean squat.

The training department will need to go to training on the Airbus, and develop a syllabus that the FAA approves. Once this is accomplished all pilots that bid and are awarded the Airbus will have to go through the entire training syllabus. Having (or not having) airbus time will make no difference.

I can't understand why any of you would think that it makes a difference in the seniority based 121 world. I understand startups like VA that operate only one type weighing more heavily on Airbus typed individuals, but a global airline like AA, with multiple types of aircraft, could care less.
BYOB is offline  
Old 10-08-2013, 06:14 AM
  #165  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: Window seat
Posts: 5,245
Default

We've got guys with Airbus time. Having time in a specific type doesn't matter but it is part of the bigger picture of an individuals qualifications(TQ's point).
Sliceback is offline  
Old 10-08-2013, 08:29 AM
  #166  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2013
Posts: 468
Default

On another note, how much help does an internal recommendation really help? Does it automatically get you looked at or is it just another item within your application and resume?
SkylineAviation is offline  
Old 10-08-2013, 10:59 AM
  #167  
Recycling dinosaurs
 
Joined APC: Nov 2010
Position: Part time
Posts: 11
Default

Anybody having issues with the aa.pilotcredentials website not saving their completed Organizational Fit Assessment?
ccb2000 is offline  
Old 10-08-2013, 12:10 PM
  #168  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Maddog FO
Posts: 651
Default

Originally Posted by ccb2000 View Post
Anybody having issues with the aa.pilotcredentials website not saving their completed Organizational Fit Assessment?
I was booted out as soon as I finished, but it showed complete when I logged back on. Is that the issue or is it showing incomplete?
Roper92 is offline  
Old 10-08-2013, 12:44 PM
  #169  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Posts: 8,902
Default

American didn't just order 460 F16s or F18s to fly JFK-LAX. They ordered A320 and B737 family aircraft. It would only make sense that the most qualified pilots would be the ones already flying A320s or 737s. The whole application is based on a point system that will score the application and narrow a pool for the first round of interviews. The AA pilotcredential website is notorious for barely having any information. How do you expect them to score the application? The fact they didn't put down any minimums means that even brand new regional airline pilots can apply. When they have 10,000+ applications, they need to narrow it down to a couple hundred for interviews.

How do you do that? Total time? TPIC time? IMO, the first round they will run is a system cutoff for Boeing/Airbus time pilots and see how many there are throughout the system.
ShyGuy is offline  
Old 10-08-2013, 01:36 PM
  #170  
Recycling dinosaurs
 
Joined APC: Nov 2010
Position: Part time
Posts: 11
Default

Originally Posted by Roper92 View Post
I was booted out as soon as I finished, but it showed complete when I logged back on. Is that the issue or is it showing incomplete?
Shows incomplete after logging back in.
ccb2000 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
AeroCrewSolut
Hiring News
2
01-26-2012 09:49 PM
edavis
Hiring News
22
06-29-2011 04:38 PM
stbloc
Hiring News
13
03-09-2011 03:56 PM
HumptyDumpty
Cargo
43
02-04-2011 03:58 PM
fjetter
Career Questions
20
01-10-2011 02:26 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices