JCBA
07-27-2014 | 04:57 AM
#1
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 421
Likes: 0
From: A terminal bum
JCBA
Starting a master thread on thoughts for the JCBA. SLI aside what improvements do we need to focus on for the group? Delta's contract is a good starting point but can be improved on. So far what we have seen from limited communication is cost neutral changes proposed.
07-27-2014 | 05:06 AM
#2
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 20,868
Likes: 187
Starting a master thread on thoughts for the JCBA. SLI aside what improvements do we need to focus on for the group? Delta's contract is a good starting point but can be improved on. So far what we have seen from limited communication is cost neutral changes proposed.
07-27-2014 | 06:07 AM
#4
Line Holder
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
From: E190 FO
100% line guarantee. Whatever you are scheduled to do, you are paid for. The only unpaid time would be if you didn't have sick time to cover an absence or you missed a part of your trip due to commuting, or you dropped a trip. If a trip cancels all or part before or after sign in, you get paid. Any reassignments would pay better of original trip or the new flying. Any extension into a day off pays 150% or a return day at straight pay, your choice, no arguments. Simplify the ability to trip trade. Make it automated and instantaneous with a 24hr window before secondary lines are created. No green or red light restrictions during this period. Then open automated trip trading again for the entire month with red and green lights.
07-27-2014 | 07:27 AM
#5
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,967
Likes: 0
We agreed to a mere $6k signing bonus to allow them to complete a merger that they TOLD US WOULD BE $1B IN ADDITIONAL YEARLY PROFITS.
Now that they made $1.5B in a single quarter, they are laughing their A$$e$ off.
Negotiations are over. We own the new car. We are off the lot.
07-27-2014 | 07:54 AM
#6
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 20,868
Likes: 187
We agreed to a mere $6k signing bonus to allow them to complete a merger that they TOLD US WOULD BE $1B IN ADDITIONAL YEARLY PROFITS.
Now that they made $1.5B in a single quarter, they are laughing their A$$e$ off.
Negotiations are over. We own the new car. We are off the lot.
Now that they made $1.5B in a single quarter, they are laughing their A$$e$ off.
Negotiations are over. We own the new car. We are off the lot.
07-27-2014 | 09:24 AM
#8
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 201
Likes: 0
07-27-2014 | 01:39 PM
#10
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 184
Likes: 0
From: B-757/767 FO
No... There is no limit to the value of changes that the company and union agree to, but there is a vague limit on the value of changes that arbitrators can impose if any items go to arbitration.
"The arbitrator’s award specifically shall adhere to the economic terms of the MTA . . ."
That's the actual language in the MOU; it doesn't set a specific value, so it's up to the arbitrators, I suppose, to decide how much change would be allowed to still remain within the economic terms of the MTA.
"The arbitrator’s award specifically shall adhere to the economic terms of the MTA . . ."
That's the actual language in the MOU; it doesn't set a specific value, so it's up to the arbitrators, I suppose, to decide how much change would be allowed to still remain within the economic terms of the MTA.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
