Search
Notices

Atlas Air Hiring

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-25-2014, 05:32 PM
  #7961  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Snickers's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2013
Position: Satisfied
Posts: 379
Default

Originally Posted by John Carr View Post
It's all a mystery, with only a few people that know all.

But the word is that EVERYTHING from resume/PAQ submittal all the way to walking out the door of the building after interview is scored.

And on first the bold part, are you referencing the PAQ form, or something else? I was able to fit 4-5 names/titles in there.

Second bold part, they've hired regional/corp/135 pilots over those with heavy/mil time. Maybe the former scored higher points via rec and how the interview went whereas the heavy time may have scored higher on the front end, etc.
hmmm that's interesting. I know they hire from all walks of life but I was thinking if there is a point system then there should (in theory) be a way to make your application more attractive if you could get the things that would give you enough points, right? Obviously, you can't just go to Walmart and pick up some heavy time but if you know what they want then it's easy to differentiate yourself. For example, a friend of mine who recently got on at another carrier said the computer that receives the resumes and applications is looking for keywords like "FMS experience", "Glass Cockpit" or other words that are synonymous to the company's values. It's not really what you've done, it's how you worded it and how the computer interprets it.

And yes, I was referring to the box in the PAQ. I just looked at mine and if I add three people's names and job titles the font gets so small that there is no way anyone would be able to read it. I only have the person I am closest to listed. Is that hurting me, or am I getting the same points as someone who has say three?
Snickers is offline  
Old 02-25-2014, 05:38 PM
  #7962  
Tuk er jerbs!
 
NightIP's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2007
Position: B747 Left
Posts: 1,342
Default

Originally Posted by captainv View Post
Just to be clear - you want us new guys to provide the solidarity that you old guys seem to lack?

From what I've seen so far, not a problem. We're fired up. How come you didn't say "if WE want change and improvement"?
+1...

All of us newer pilots are ready to swing for the fences. I've had a couple 15+ year guys tell me that we'll hurt the company's competitiveness by shooting for better in 2016, though. True story.
NightIP is offline  
Old 02-25-2014, 06:15 PM
  #7963  
Gets Weekends Off
 
DC8DRIVER's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Position: 747
Posts: 1,290
Default

Originally Posted by ATCsaidDoWhat View Post
Not sure what pay rates you're looking at, but you can have American's. And don't be surprised when you see the others ratchet down in the next couple of years.
While we should shoot for the moon, I'll settle for AA pay scales. 12 year 747 Capt. at $241/hr. 12 year 747 FO at 164/hr. 16% 401K DC Contribution starting 1/2014. Future contractual pay raises: Variable percentage every year through 2018. Pay parity review with UA and DL in 2016. And I wouldn't expect to "see the others ratchet down in the next couple of years" with DAL net profit in 2013 at 10.54 Billion dollars and UAL at 571 Million.

While it sounds like you have all the answers that nobody else ever could about the next contract perhaps we should listen to alternative ideas until the union opens contract talks, sort of like CRM. However, this particular thread is probably not the best place to air out explicit "discussions" about ideas for the next contract. What readers of a hiring thread about Atlas should probably see are the basic plusses and minuses of our current contract, and the fact that we are working hard to make significant improvements in the next one. Anything else could veer a discussion about Atlas hiring waaaay off course.

8
DC8DRIVER is offline  
Old 02-25-2014, 06:20 PM
  #7964  
Gets Weekends Off
 
744driver's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2010
Position: B767 CA
Posts: 1,100
Default

I'm one of those guys that's been here a long time...and guess what?...I'm not one bit interested in leaving money on the table. In fact, my style of negotiations will likely involve reaching across the table and grabbing money out of their pockets.

Let us not worry about guys that are only a couple of years away from retirement, but seem to be convincing us that it is okay to sit back, and negotiate by saying, "please, Mr Atlas, can we have a few dollars more?".

Disclaimer...ATCsaidDoWhat is on our side, trust me...I know him and his credentials are enviable. The ones I'm referring to are the ones on our private forum elsewhere that beat that drum about accepting only a little bit more each time we sit down with the company...you know the ones.

Sorry, it is way time for you, me, and all those hired in the last 5 years to take a stand and say, enough...and let us bring those naysayers to our side.

Thoughts?...!!

Rant over, now back to the hiring discussion (after I toss a grenade, right?!!)

Last edited by 744driver; 02-25-2014 at 06:39 PM.
744driver is offline  
Old 02-25-2014, 06:52 PM
  #7965  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2009
Posts: 611
Default

Originally Posted by ATCsaidDoWhat View Post
Not sure what pay rates you're looking at, but you can have American's. And don't be surprised when you see the others ratchet down in the next couple of years.

As to valid excuses...not sure how long you've been around, but I suspect not long enough to know the history. Or the fact that in terms of contracts, as was said above, this is a second contract as opposed to the ones you reference that have been in place and modified many times over decades.

If you want change and improvement, start by unifying the pilot group around a single goal...instead of everyone having their own ideas on how to do things. Management loves that.

As to the complaint in another post about retirement? 401k will always be a risk. Again, IF the group could get behind a single concept, the way to go would be to join one of the well funded and very secure IBT pension plans that has a very solid track record. But that will never happen when everyone has their own solution and it's the only correct one.

Been there, seen that and have all the t-shirts in the closet.
Wow...where do I begin?

You may have been around a lot longer than I have but you certainly have not been paying attention.

Others ratchet down...

Pattern bargaining is happening as it always has. The concession stand is closed. Major CBA gains have taken place at multiple airlines and they will each trump one another as these airlines are all turning record profits.

Other carriers merged (United and Continental, Delta and Northwest, American and US Airways) and all used their leverage from each merger to make major contractual gains. We threw that leverage away.

This next January:

Atlas Captain $209.14

American $238.71 (American snaps to the average of Delta and United in January 2016. I would take that $30 an hour pay raise now and the almost $65 pay raise for 2016, you wouldn't?)
Delta $276.75
FedEx $269.61
United $268.88
UPS $268.17

Saying that hourly pay is the tip of the iceberg would be an understatement.

Our monthly guarantee is one of the lowest in the industry, even the regionals are in the mid 70s.
Deadhead Pay: the airlines with bad contracts get 50% pay, most get 100% pay, we get 35% pay.
We lack the most basic day or duty rigs.
Trip rig at 4.85 hours paid in a 24 hour period of a trip while everyone else is paid over 6 hours in a 24 hour period of a trip.

I love how you scold me for coming up with my own ideas right before you introduce your own ideas about retirement.

By the way, I would not take a pension plan even if the company was giving it away for free...are you nuts?

Other than FedEx pilots (who would lose their pension if the company ever declares bankruptcy), who still has a pension? Bankruptcy took them all away and it would only be a matter of time before they did that to us. (I guess you do not have this t-shirt, but I do)

Fact: 401k plans can not be taken away by the company, they are the way of the present and the way of the future.

This transition from pension plans to 401ks has only been happening across the country since the mid 1980's.

All of the other top tier airlines now have 16% contribution of a pilot's W2 pay deposited into their 401k account. Pilot participation is not required for this benefit. We get a 5% match if we contribute...pathetic

Why do I feel like I am wasting my time even explaining all of this to you?

Don't get me wrong, I like working at Atlas. However, the financial difference in compensation over a pilot's career would number in the millions.

Last edited by JonnyKnoxville; 02-25-2014 at 07:27 PM.
JonnyKnoxville is offline  
Old 02-25-2014, 07:07 PM
  #7966  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2011
Posts: 249
Default

You are wasting your breath. The senior guys have ZERO clue about the rest of the industry. The FO's and ex-Polar crews have the majority for the next contract vote, so don't let them get to you. Sadly they don't care if the bottom half of the list were to leave either. They don't think it will affect them. Good luck getting contracts to fly with no pilots to staff the planes.
CandlerKid is offline  
Old 02-25-2014, 07:15 PM
  #7967  
Gets Weekends Off
 
DC8DRIVER's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Position: 747
Posts: 1,290
Default

Originally Posted by Snickers View Post
hmmm that's interesting. I know they hire from all walks of life but I was thinking if there is a point system then there should (in theory) be a way to make your application more attractive if you could get the things that would give you enough points, right? Obviously, you can't just go to Walmart and pick up some heavy time but if you know what they want then it's easy to differentiate yourself. For example, a friend of mine who recently got on at another carrier said the computer that receives the resumes and applications is looking for keywords like "FMS experience", "Glass Cockpit" or other words that are synonymous to the company's values. It's not really what you've done, it's how you worded it and how the computer interprets it.

And yes, I was referring to the box in the PAQ. I just looked at mine and if I add three people's names and job titles the font gets so small that there is no way anyone would be able to read it. I only have the person I am closest to listed. Is that hurting me, or am I getting the same points as someone who has say three?
I have never heard of a computer scanning system used here for resumes and there is no way to know how the point system (if, indeed, there is one?) works. I think there is a way to get additional names on the PAQ if you have the most up to date Adobe software.

From the many recently hired pilots I have come across in the past 2.5 years, my impression is that there is little emphasis placed on any one particular column of experience/background (with the exception of some current '76 pilots that were fast-tracked when we started that program). There are heavy pilots who are weak in glass/FMS systems. There are regional guys who thrive on 17 day trips and multiple schedule changes. There seems to be no one industry segment that is highly preferred.

Atlas seems to place the most weight on the individual who will thrive under the peculiar conditions we have at Atlas. They want pilots who have done their homework and know a lot about the working conditions here and still really want the job. They also seem to hire a lot of guys who will be easy to get along with in the cockpit during a 16 hour flight.

Sorry to be so vague, but that is the way it appears to me. Of course you should emphasize your strengths whether it be C-5 or RJ time, glass cockpit, ocean crossings, IP, Check Airman, whatever. Just be sure that you have done your homework because the people I know who were not chosen after an interview didn't know the company or didn't know how they would fit in.

8

Last edited by DC8DRIVER; 02-25-2014 at 07:34 PM.
DC8DRIVER is offline  
Old 02-25-2014, 07:25 PM
  #7968  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2013
Posts: 4,672
Default

Agree with all your points, and it can get a little complicated;

Originally Posted by JonnyKnoxville View Post
Trip rig at 4.85 hours paid in a 24 hour period of a trip while everyone else is paid over 6 hours in a 24 hour period of a trip.
This is from the UAL CBA;

5-G-2 Schedules shall contain a minimum of five (5) hours pay value, averaged, for each day in a Trip.
John Carr is offline  
Old 02-25-2014, 07:45 PM
  #7969  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2009
Posts: 611
Default

Originally Posted by John Carr View Post
Agree with all your points, and it can get a little complicated;



This is from the UAL CBA;
No worries:

5-G-3 Schedules shall contain a minimum of one (1) hour pay value for each three and one-half (3.5) hours elapsed time away from Base, prorated, on a schedule or actual basis, whichever is greater.

24 hours divided by 3.5 hours = 6.857 hours paid in a 24 hour period.

Although 5-G-2 includes the word trip, it is really their day rig. 5-G-3 is the trip rig.
JonnyKnoxville is offline  
Old 02-25-2014, 07:49 PM
  #7970  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2013
Posts: 4,672
Default

Originally Posted by JonnyKnoxville View Post
No worries:

5-G-3 Schedules shall contain a minimum of one (1) hour pay value for each three and one-half (3.5) hours elapsed time away from Base, prorated, on a schedule or actual basis, whichever is greater.

24 hours divided by 3.5 hours = 6.857 hours paid in a 24 hour period.
Touche *****cat.

Skipped that as the guys I know (on reserve) seem to usually have the former section usually apply.
John Carr is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
AAL763
Atlas/Polar
112
12-10-2016 04:13 PM
ProceedOnCourse
Hiring News
23
08-16-2009 06:40 PM
cencal83406
Regional
17
02-03-2009 07:19 PM
astropilot92571
Hiring News
4
04-26-2005 08:58 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices