Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Career Builder > Career Questions
Race and gender in hiring practices. >

Race and gender in hiring practices.

Search
Notices
Career Questions Career advice, interview prep and gouges, job fairs, etc.

Race and gender in hiring practices.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-12-2019, 12:35 PM
  #31  
Disinterested Third Party
 
Joined APC: Jun 2012
Posts: 6,026
Default

Originally Posted by 2StgTurbine View Post
And when I interviewed there were 4 women. 3 were check airmen at their regional too. At the end of the day, only 1 was hired.

If there really was a conspiracy to put women above men, then someone forgot to tell the interviewers because they sent 2 women home that had higher qualifications than me.
It goes both ways. There are well qualified women who will always get discounted when people assume they got the job because they were female.

Originally Posted by OOfff View Post
Exactly the point. Nothing exists to support claims of discrimination against white males in pilot hiring.

So let’s put the issue to bed and stop complaining about how hard it is for a white dude in aviation.
Au contraire.

I can take the rest of your day and all of tomorrow accounting in great detail personal experiences of women (and minorities) hired because they were women and minorities, when they were not the best candidate by any metric, when those hirings displaced others who were more qualified.
JohnBurke is offline  
Old 05-12-2019, 12:49 PM
  #32  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2016
Posts: 6,716
Default

Originally Posted by JohnBurke View Post
It goes both ways. There are well qualified women who will always get discounted when people assume they got the job because they were female.



Au contraire.

I can take the rest of your day and all of tomorrow accounting in great detail personal experiences of women (and minorities) hired because they were women and minorities, when they were not the best candidate by any metric, when those hirings displaced others who were more qualified.
I wonder if any man was ever hired when he wasn’t the “most qualified.” I was hired with almost zero TPIC and way before longtime LCAs, reps, special projects people, MBAs, veterans, and compelling personalities that I worked with while building time. Was it my gender that got me the job? Or do you just not take offense to that because I lack anything that identifies me physically as having “displaced” my betters?
OOfff is offline  
Old 05-12-2019, 01:21 PM
  #33  
Gets Weekends Off
 
ItnStln's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2016
Posts: 1,584
Default

Originally Posted by 2StgTurbine View Post
Everyone knows why United has a higher percentage. But American and Delta are literally within a fraction of a percent. That means Delta and American have about 6 more women than you would statistically expect. Is that really worth the butthurt?
Why does United have a higher percentage?
ItnStln is offline  
Old 05-12-2019, 01:33 PM
  #34  
Gets Weekends Off
 
GogglesPisano's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2013
Position: On the hotel shuttle
Posts: 5,815
Default

Originally Posted by OOfff View Post
You’re right, I can’t provide statistics about sexual harassment, discouragement, assumptions of incompetence, social isolation, etc.

I’m not even sure how you’d ask me to quantify that.
Because you’ve been complaining about guys relying on anecdote rather than statistics when it came to preferential hiring.

So you decided to reply to my request for facts with ... anecdotes.
GogglesPisano is online now  
Old 05-12-2019, 03:04 PM
  #35  
Disinterested Third Party
 
Joined APC: Jun 2012
Posts: 6,026
Default

Originally Posted by OOfff View Post
I wonder if any man was ever hired when he wasn’t the “most qualified.” I was hired with almost zero TPIC and way before longtime LCAs, reps, special projects people, MBAs, veterans, and compelling personalities that I worked with while building time. Was it my gender that got me the job? Or do you just not take offense to that because I lack anything that identifies me physically as having “displaced” my betters?
I said nothing of taking offense.

I can tell you that when applying for a particular government assignment, I didn't ask for preferential points under any category. When I followed up on the application, I was asked if I wanted to update my application to show anything that qualified with "preference points." No, I didn't. Was I gay? Female? Ethnic? Veteran? Handicapped? I said I declined to cite for preference points. Thanks for applying, but without those points, not a chance. I was by far the most qualified applicant they had, far and away. I was told "If you were a handicapped lesbian veteran, we'd have a look."

Like I said, we can go on all day long with personal experience upon personal experience and observation, over many, many years.
JohnBurke is offline  
Old 05-12-2019, 03:32 PM
  #36  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2016
Posts: 6,716
Default

Originally Posted by JohnBurke View Post
I said nothing of taking offense.

I can tell you that when applying for a particular government assignment, I didn't ask for preferential points under any category. When I followed up on the application, I was asked if I wanted to update my application to show anything that qualified with "preference points." No, I didn't. Was I gay? Female? Ethnic? Veteran? Handicapped? I said I declined to cite for preference points. Thanks for applying, but without those points, not a chance. I was by far the most qualified applicant they had, far and away. I was told "If you were a handicapped lesbian veteran, we'd have a look."

Like I said, we can go on all day long with personal experience upon personal experience and observation, over many, many years.
We are talking about pilot hiring, not government service.
OOfff is offline  
Old 05-12-2019, 03:34 PM
  #37  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2016
Posts: 6,716
Default

Originally Posted by GogglesPisano View Post
Because you’ve been complaining about guys relying on anecdote rather than statistics when it came to preferential hiring.

So you decided to reply to my request for facts with ... anecdotes.
In the interest of not having the banal discussion of whether sexual harassment is real or not, I will retract everything I said about the bull**** women endure in aviation. They don’t by any available statistics. They also get no notable advantage that isn’t extremely confined to within the data noise.
OOfff is offline  
Old 05-12-2019, 04:38 PM
  #38  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Dec 2018
Posts: 648
Default

Originally Posted by JohnBurke View Post
I said nothing of taking offense.

I can tell you that when applying for a particular government assignment, I didn't ask for preferential points under any category. When I followed up on the application, I was asked if I wanted to update my application to show anything that qualified with "preference points." No, I didn't. Was I gay? Female? Ethnic? Veteran? Handicapped? I said I declined to cite for preference points. Thanks for applying, but without those points, not a chance. I was by far the most qualified applicant they had, far and away. I was told "If you were a handicapped lesbian veteran, we'd have a look."

Like I said, we can go on all day long with personal experience upon personal experience and observation, over many, many years.
I feel like if the HR manager told you that regarding being a "handicapped lesbian veteran" (something I highly doubt anyone would ever tell you), then maybe you weren't as qualified as you thought you were.
ChecklistMonkey is offline  
Old 05-12-2019, 10:42 PM
  #39  
Disinterested Third Party
 
Joined APC: Jun 2012
Posts: 6,026
Default

Originally Posted by OOfff View Post
We are talking about pilot hiring, not government service.
It was a pilot position, and it applies throughout the industry; airline, cargo, charter, government, utility, whatever. Done them all, ad infinitum, interviewed in them all, and I've seen prejudicial hiring in favor of minorities and women in all...for decades. How about you?

Originally Posted by ChecklistMonkey View Post
I feel like if the HR manager told you that regarding being a "handicapped lesbian veteran" (something I highly doubt anyone would ever tell you), then maybe you weren't as qualified as you thought you were.
What you believe or doubt is irrelevant. It was a firefighting position. In that case, I can absolutely guarantee I was the only applicant in the country with heavy tanker, single engine tanker, air attack, fire patrol, and ground fire experience with current time in the aircraft and recent FSI and Simuflite experience and pro card. Far and away more experienced than the woman they ended up hiring, who had a couple of seasons as a tanker copilot under her belt. Why did she get hired? Thanks to a recent sexual harassment suit based on another woman who felt she was passed over, that particular location had a strong motive to put a woman in the position. As it turned out, she didn't stay in the position for very long. While I was happy for her and hoped she did well, it was significant for me at the time because I'd hit the age limit and it was my last chance, which is why I remember the particulars.

And absolutely yes, I was told that while I'd have been a shoe-in as a handicapped lesbian veteran with ethnic preference, I was told that they appreciated the application as it made their pick look better, and I was told that without the preference points, zero chance. It wasn't my first time around the block; I spent a big chunk of my life in that line of work. Accordingly, I don't really care what you feel like. You weren't there.
JohnBurke is offline  
Old 05-13-2019, 02:16 AM
  #40  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jan 2015
Posts: 516
Default

There's always been discrimination, Ive noticed people respond to it with a conventional wisdom. It feels perfectly right, when a mil guy or the chief pilots son slides into a legacy with relatively low time. A no name minority getting the same treatment makes peoples blood boil. Lots of big egos in this biz.
kevbo is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
robthree
Hiring News
103
08-26-2012 10:14 PM
CE750
Major
97
11-28-2006 03:50 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices