Logbook Questions
#12
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 897
Likes: 0
From: RC-3 Seabee. Skipper of the A21 cutter.
#14
Prime Minister/Moderator

Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 44,930
Likes: 699
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
#15
Prime Minister/Moderator

Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 44,930
Likes: 699
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Logging landings is just to keep track of currency requirements. Log the landings as a CFI if you want! It's not against FARs.
For my own benefit, why aren't you logging the IFR training as dual given? You're a II aren't you? Why not log it as dual given if you're giving instruction? I would!!
edit: I checked out part 61.51 and there is nothing there that says anything about logging landings. It seems to be more of an individual preference because it's not against FARs to log landings as an instructor from what I see. When you are giving instruction, you are PIC and I would think you can and should log those landings. The FAA isn't 100% clear on what you CAN'T log. If you're A$$ is in a flying aparatus (PIC or dual rec), log that time!! In regards to FTD and Sim counting towards total time, I asked the captain about this and he said United never sepatated the Sim time from his TT. Wasn't even an issue. My full motion sim time is signed off and I include that in my TT. I haven't done that on my apps but I should and I will when I apply again next year. I know plenty of people that did that and they still got the job. The airlines are not going to turn their backs on you if you counted your sim time in your TT, they'll just tell you they don't except that, subract it and move on with the rest of the interview.
For my own benefit, why aren't you logging the IFR training as dual given? You're a II aren't you? Why not log it as dual given if you're giving instruction? I would!!
edit: I checked out part 61.51 and there is nothing there that says anything about logging landings. It seems to be more of an individual preference because it's not against FARs to log landings as an instructor from what I see. When you are giving instruction, you are PIC and I would think you can and should log those landings. The FAA isn't 100% clear on what you CAN'T log. If you're A$$ is in a flying aparatus (PIC or dual rec), log that time!! In regards to FTD and Sim counting towards total time, I asked the captain about this and he said United never sepatated the Sim time from his TT. Wasn't even an issue. My full motion sim time is signed off and I include that in my TT. I haven't done that on my apps but I should and I will when I apply again next year. I know plenty of people that did that and they still got the job. The airlines are not going to turn their backs on you if you counted your sim time in your TT, they'll just tell you they don't except that, subract it and move on with the rest of the interview.
For currency purposes, you must be the sole manipulator. Since currency is the primary reason for logging landings, the industry standard is that all logged landings will qualify for legal currency purposes.
If a CFI logs all landings that his students do, then a potential empoyer would have great difficulty verifying that you had maintained LDG currecncy while employed as a CFI, since only sole manipulator LDG's count. Note: If you DEMONSTRATE a LDG to student, that counts since you were the manipulator (that's how I stayed LDG current). But LDG demonstrations aren't needed very often, and everybody knows it. I would get 1-2 LDG's each month, hopefully at night.
I'll caution new pilots against taking FAR paragraphs verbatim...there are often OTHER paragraphs elsewhere in the FAR's which apply, as well as FAA Legal Opinions, Advisory Circulars, and NTSB determinations to take into account. You really just need some experience in the business to have a good feel for it...the landing issue is just one of those things that you would know after doing it for a few years.
Also an airline might very well terminate an interview if you showed up and a significant amount of your "total time" actually turned out to be sim time...your REAL total time might be less than mins, or what was competetive for them at the time. Also they will be annoyed that you misrepresented yourself. We are in the business of flying airplanes, and flight experience is the key marker for career progression. Simulators are used for training, and real pilots don't count that as flying. If you think you're going to change the industry standard by quoting an out-of-context FAR at an interview, you're in for a surprise.
Remember, I'm here to help you, not argue about things with which I have years of experience.
Last edited by rickair7777; 08-01-2007 at 10:13 AM.
#16
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 897
Likes: 0
From: RC-3 Seabee. Skipper of the A21 cutter.
Wrong. Try FAR 61.57 (a)(1)(i)
For currency purposes, you must be the sole manipulator. Since currency is the primary reason for logging landings, the industry standard is that all logged landings will qualify for legal currency purposes.
If a CFI logs all landings that his students do, then a potential empoyer would have great difficulty verifying that you had maintained LDG currecncy while employed as a CFI, since only sole manipulator LDG's count. Note: If you DEMONSTRATE a LDG to student, that counts since you were the manipulator (that's how I stayed LDG current). But LDG demonstrations aren't needed very often, and everybody knows it. I would get 1-2 LDG's each month, hopefully at night.
I'll caution new pilots against taking FAR paragraphs verbatim...there are often OTHER paragraphs elsewhere in the FAR's which apply, as well as FAA Legal Opinions, Advisory Circulars, and NTSB determinations to take into account. You really just need some experience in the business to have a good feel for it...the landing issue is just one of those things that you would know after doing it for a few years.
For currency purposes, you must be the sole manipulator. Since currency is the primary reason for logging landings, the industry standard is that all logged landings will qualify for legal currency purposes.
If a CFI logs all landings that his students do, then a potential empoyer would have great difficulty verifying that you had maintained LDG currecncy while employed as a CFI, since only sole manipulator LDG's count. Note: If you DEMONSTRATE a LDG to student, that counts since you were the manipulator (that's how I stayed LDG current). But LDG demonstrations aren't needed very often, and everybody knows it. I would get 1-2 LDG's each month, hopefully at night.
I'll caution new pilots against taking FAR paragraphs verbatim...there are often OTHER paragraphs elsewhere in the FAR's which apply, as well as FAA Legal Opinions, Advisory Circulars, and NTSB determinations to take into account. You really just need some experience in the business to have a good feel for it...the landing issue is just one of those things that you would know after doing it for a few years.
I've discussed this issue with some folks at the club, some of them current RJ pilots, and not a one was even asked about landings in the interview. They just looked at times. I wouldn't bluntly say "WRONG" when there's nothing in the FARs that says "Flight instructors cannot log landings while giving flight instruction". If you find otherwise, I'll admit I'm wrong and move on. I don't think the FAA is going to go out of their way to burn an instructor who is logging all landings. That's just silly. Maintaining currency shouldn't be an issue for most pilots flying consistently. But I get your point.
#17
Prime Minister/Moderator

Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 44,930
Likes: 699
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
To simplify, here is a summary of what a CFI/CFII/MEI can log while giving dual. This is based mostly on the FAR's, as well as "industry accepted practice". Following these guidelines will simply your future job-hunting experiences.
CFII giving Sim Instruction: This CANNOT be logged in ANY airplane related column. Not even maybe. However it is a good idea to log sim dual given in a SEPERATE column that you create...sim dual given time might help you get a job as a sim instructor either at your airline, or after you get furloughed.
Dual Given in airplanes:
- Total Time: Yes
- Dual Given: Yes
- PIC: Yes (there are a very few exceptions, such as if the CFI has no medical).
- ASEL or AMEL: Yes, whichever is applicable
- Night: Yes
- XC: Yes
- Instrument: Log only actual IMC (any IMC counts, regardles of who is manipulating).
- Simulated Instrument: No (VFR practice, or IFR-in-VMC doesn't count unless YOU are under the hood).
- Approaches and Holds: No (you must be sole manipulator, so a demonstration could count if YOU flew it)
- Landings: No (you must be sole manipulator, so a demonstration could count if YOU flew it)
- High Performace: Yes
- Complex: Yes
You should also log (in a seperate column) dual given as a CFII...this time can count for certain part 141 jobs, if you ever need a job. This can be in any airplane, as long as it was towards an instrument rating or the instrument requirements of another rating.
Did I forget anything?
CFII giving Sim Instruction: This CANNOT be logged in ANY airplane related column. Not even maybe. However it is a good idea to log sim dual given in a SEPERATE column that you create...sim dual given time might help you get a job as a sim instructor either at your airline, or after you get furloughed.
Dual Given in airplanes:
- Total Time: Yes
- Dual Given: Yes
- PIC: Yes (there are a very few exceptions, such as if the CFI has no medical).
- ASEL or AMEL: Yes, whichever is applicable
- Night: Yes
- XC: Yes
- Instrument: Log only actual IMC (any IMC counts, regardles of who is manipulating).
- Simulated Instrument: No (VFR practice, or IFR-in-VMC doesn't count unless YOU are under the hood).
- Approaches and Holds: No (you must be sole manipulator, so a demonstration could count if YOU flew it)
- Landings: No (you must be sole manipulator, so a demonstration could count if YOU flew it)
- High Performace: Yes
- Complex: Yes
You should also log (in a seperate column) dual given as a CFII...this time can count for certain part 141 jobs, if you ever need a job. This can be in any airplane, as long as it was towards an instrument rating or the instrument requirements of another rating.
Did I forget anything?
Last edited by rickair7777; 08-01-2007 at 10:35 AM.
#18
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 897
Likes: 0
From: RC-3 Seabee. Skipper of the A21 cutter.
To simplify, here is a summary of what a CFI/CFII/MEI can log while giving dual. This is based mostly on the FAR's, as well as "industry accepted practice". Following these guidelines will simply your future job-hunting experiences.
CFII giving Sim Instruction: This CANNOT be logged in ANY airplane related column. Not eve maybe. However it is a good idea to log sim dual given in a SEPERATE column that you create...sim dual given time might help you get a job as a sim instructor either at your airline, or after you get furloughed.
Dual Given in airplanes:
- Total Time: Yes
- Dual Given: Yes
- PIC: Yes (there are a very few exceptions, such as if the CFI has no medical).
- ASEL or AMEL: Yes, whichever is applicable
- Night: Yes
- XC: Yes
- Instrument: Log only actual IMC
- Simulated Instrument: No (VFR practice, or IFR-in-VMC doesn't count unless YOU are under the hood).
- Approaches and Holds: No (you must be sole manipulator, so a demonstration could count if YOU flew it)
- Landings: No (you must be sole manipulator, so a demonstration could count if YOU flew it)
- High Performace: Yes
- Complex: Yes
Did I forget anything?
CFII giving Sim Instruction: This CANNOT be logged in ANY airplane related column. Not eve maybe. However it is a good idea to log sim dual given in a SEPERATE column that you create...sim dual given time might help you get a job as a sim instructor either at your airline, or after you get furloughed.
Dual Given in airplanes:
- Total Time: Yes
- Dual Given: Yes
- PIC: Yes (there are a very few exceptions, such as if the CFI has no medical).
- ASEL or AMEL: Yes, whichever is applicable
- Night: Yes
- XC: Yes
- Instrument: Log only actual IMC
- Simulated Instrument: No (VFR practice, or IFR-in-VMC doesn't count unless YOU are under the hood).
- Approaches and Holds: No (you must be sole manipulator, so a demonstration could count if YOU flew it)
- Landings: No (you must be sole manipulator, so a demonstration could count if YOU flew it)
- High Performace: Yes
- Complex: Yes
Did I forget anything?
I looked at the FAR you referred to and it is simply for currency but still doesn't specify exactly what landings can't be logged as a CFI. That's a gray area and I'm not too worried about it anyway as I will be doing plenty of landings on my own time.
#19
Prime Minister/Moderator

Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 44,930
Likes: 699
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
They also look at instrument, night, and BFR currency. They have specially trained auditors (or interview captains) review your logbook...you want it as clean and black-and-white as possible.
#20
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 897
Likes: 0
From: RC-3 Seabee. Skipper of the A21 cutter.
Nobody cares about how many LDG's you have. Airlines only look at them for one purpose: To ensure that you NEVER flew while out of currency...even a brief gap in the distant past will disqualify you. Logging your student's LDG's would create confusion and doubt, which will not help you get the job.
They also look at instrument, night, and BFR currency. They have specially trained auditors (or interview captains) review your logbook...you want it as clean and black-and-white as possible.
They also look at instrument, night, and BFR currency. They have specially trained auditors (or interview captains) review your logbook...you want it as clean and black-and-white as possible.
A gap in the distant past will not disqualify you from getting a job. Who told you that?!? I have met many captains and other pilots who have had years between flying and are now working at UAL, AAL, etc. I have a pretty big gap of "occasional" flying after 911 but that's not going to doom my career. That's absurd. As far as landings, the RJs just want to see that you are current, they're not going to go through your landings with a fine tooth comb. Logging student landings is not going to keep you from getting a job. They would lose a lot of applicants if they went through the trouble to make sure that you didn't log landings during instruction given. With all honesty, I could care less about logging my landings as long as I do enough to keep myself current while instructing.
I will say this. A gap between "employment" isn't in the pilots' favor but it still doesn't wreck his career or disqualify him/her. That's a very subjective thing as they could have taken sick leave, had a death in the family....Who knows.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
JetJock16
Regional
2
06-28-2007 12:46 PM



